House bans welfare recipients' money from strip clubs, liquor stores
AHMAD AL-RUBAYE/AFP/Getty Images
The House of Representatives overwhelmingly passed a bill that prohibits welfare recipients from using their government subsidy in strip clubs, liquor stores and casinos.
The measure easily received the necessary support of two-thirds of House members, with 395 voting in favor and only 27 opposing.
House Republicans introduced and promoted the proposal as a way to eliminate government wasteful spending. It has passed the House before, and they re-introduced it again hoping it will become part of a bill to extend the payroll tax credit, which both the House and Senate is expected to debate this month.
The Senate has not agreed to take up the measure.
Popular in Politics
- Officials on Benghazi: "We made mistakes, but without malice" 436 Comments
- Major immigration overhaul passes first big test
- Top IRS official to invoke 5th Amendment at congressional testimony 131 Comments
- Anthony Weiner comeback try begins: Running for NYC mayor
- U.S. IDs several men possibly responsible for Benghazi attack
- Va. GOP candidate: Planned Parenthood "more lethal" for blacks than KKK 1209 Comments
- Obama: "Full focus" is on recovery from Oklahoma tornado 91 Comments
- Poll: Most think IRS targeting was deliberate 178 Comments














Um, yeah jackass, it IS a negative. This anti-republican feels the house could be concentrating on, oh, maybe something to help the economy or jobs situation. Not wasting the taxpayers money trying to legislate some very low-rate, low-incident problem. I'm willing to bet they wasted more money trying to legislate this than the actual problem costs. Grow up.
OK moron - in 2010, $1.8 BILLION was withdrawn from welfare cards at casino ATM in California alone. Your president's Healthcare bill did more to negatively impact jobs then any time they could have wasted on this bill. Do the math idiot
Remeber Terry Shivo? Should government get involved with end of life decisions?
Seems to me, GOP talks limited government except when they don't want it limited. Am I wrong about that?