Poll: Most want limits on campaign spending
CBS
A majority of Americans favor limits on both how much money individuals can contribute to political campaigns and on how much outside groups can spend on advertisements designed to influence an election, according to a new CBS News/New York Times survey.
Sixty-four percent said the government should limit individual contributions to campaigns, while 31 percent favored allowing individuals to make unlimited campaign contributions. Majorities of Republicans, Democrats and indipendents all favored limiting contributions.
Individuals are currently allowed to give $2,500 to each candidate or candidate committee during an election cycle, and $30,800 to a national party committee each election year.
In this election cycle, super PACs backing various presidential candidates - though not officially affiliated with them - have already spent millions on ads to prop up or tear down a candidate. In the CBS News/New York Times survey, Americans were told that groups that are technically unaffiliated with candidates can spend unlimited money on advertisements during a presidential campaign, and asked if such spending should be limited by law.
Sixty-seven percent of respondents - including clear majorities of Republicans, Democrats and independents - said yes. Only 29 percent favored the unlimited spending on advertising from outside groups now permitted by law.
MORE FROM THE POLL:Poll: Obama ties Romney in head-to-head match up
Poll: 4 in 10 say gov't should pay more attention to minority issues
Poll: More see signs of life in economy
Poll: Obama's approval rating stable; Americans want compromise
Poll: Mitt Romney atop fluid GOP race with 28%
Read the full poll (PDF):
Race relations and the role of the federal government
The economy, the president and the general election
The Republican race for the nomination
This poll was conducted by telephone from January 12-17, 2012 among 1,154 adults nationwide.
1,021 interviews were conducted with registered voters and 340 with voters who said they plan to vote in a Republican primary. Phone numbers were dialed from samples of both standard land-line and cell phones. The error due to sampling for results based on the entire sample could be plus or minus three percentage points. The margin of error for the sample of registered voters could be plus or minus three points and five points for the sample of Republican primary voters. The error for subgroups may be higher. This poll release conforms to the Standards of Disclosure of the National Council on Public Polls.
Popular in Politics
- FBI: Surveillance info helped reveal subway, stock exchange bombings 169 Comments
- Jesse Jackson Jr. asks to serve jail sentence before wife
- Obama: "Very easy to slip-slide" into deeper Syrian involvement
- Obama on NSA programs: Americans "not getting the complete story" 246 Comments
- IRS scandal: Is partisanship overshadowing facts? 164 Comments
- Snowden: U.S. gov't destroyed my chance for fair trial 299 Comments
- Supreme Court strikes down Arizona voting law 914 Comments
- Former critic McCaskill pushes for Hillary Clinton 2016 bid














That way, there will be no major surprises when corporate taxes are done away with completely and citizens are taxed at 72% (subject to change as government liabilities rise)
These people couldn't be controlled before, and now they are spending untold millions...perhaps billions, and we don't even know who they are or who they represent.
One thing is sure...
They don't represent the American people!
Come again?
Could you provide a few facts to support your claim? If you can't don't accuse.
eliminated completely.
This is the only way we are going to get even a somewhat honest Congressmen or Senator pn office.
Put an end to bought and paid for what are SUPPOSED to be representatives of the American people.
Make every candidate you support from now on, sign a pledge to vote "YES" for term limits their first year in office.
While their at it make it illegal for any Representative or Senator to accept any money or gift for themselves or their families while in office or for a period of 4 years after they get out. They get a paycheck don't they? That's what they get to live on. No freebies. No stock options. No golf course memberships or rides on someones Lear Jet. If these guys spent their time working rather than jet setting we might get something done. Let them punch a clock and justify the hours they work.
Give each candidate with the appropriate amount of signatures to prove their a viable candidate the same amount of funds.
Put words to paper and prove you can run a budget. Gives us an idea how they will do in the position their running for in an election.