Political Hotsheet
By

Samuel J. Best /

CBS News/ January 10, 2012, 10:41 PM

Why Mitt Romney won the New Hampshire primary

Mitt Romney

Mitt Romney surrounded by his family points towards supporters at his primary night victory party in Manchester, N.H., Jan. 10, 2012.

/ AP Photo/Elise Amendola
Mitt Romney won a decisive victory Tuesday night in New Hampshire. The CBS News exit poll showed he expanded his base of support well beyond the groups he won in Iowa. His appeal was grounded in beliefs that he has the best chance of defeating President Obama in November and is the most equipped to handle the struggling economy. The other candidates each found trouble gaining traction against Romney on his home turf.

Full New Hampshire primary results
New Hampshire Exit Poll
Republican Primary Election Center

Favorite Son

The lure of having someone with local roots on the ballot in November was clearly attractive to New Hampshire GOP primary voters. Romney - the former Massachusetts governor who owns a summer home in New Hampshire - was the only candidate that a majority of voters claimed they would be content with as the Republican nominee. Sixty-one percent of New Hampshire primary voters would be satisfied with Romney winning the nomination, compared to only 43 percent who would satisfied if Ron Paul won, 37 percent who would satisfied if Rick Santorum won, and 35 percent who be satisfied if Newt Gingrich won.

Widespread Appeal

Romney defeated his competitors across a wide range of demographic groups in New Hampshire, including many of which he lost in the Iowa caucuses. He won female voters by 20 percentage points and male voters by 12 percentage points. He won among voters from urban areas by 13 percentage points, from suburban areas by 19 percentage points, and from rural areas - a group he lost in Iowa - by 10 percentage points. He won every age group with the exception of those under the age of 30, who again sided again with Paul by a comfortable margin.

Romney also did well among voters across the political spectrum. He easily won the support of self-identified Republicans, crushing Paul by 33 percentage points. And he came close to winning self-identified independent voters - a group he lost by 24 points in Iowa - losing to Paul 32 percent to 29 percent.

Romney won pluralities of support from both economic and social conservatives. Among voters who reported being conservative on fiscal issues such as taxing and spending, Romney bested Paul 37 percent to 21 percent. More impressively, he won a plurality of support among voters who reported being conservative on social issues such as gay marriage and abortion, securing 35 percent of their vote compared to 20 percent for Santorum.

Full CBS News coverage: Mitt Romney

Perceived as the Most Electable

New Hampshire Republican primary voters were primarily concerned about winning the presidential election than the conservative credentials of the candidates. Thirty-five percent of voters reported that the ability to defeat President Obama was the most important candidate quality in their decision. Among these voters, Romney was their overwhelming choice, receiving a whopping 62 percent of their support compared to 12 percent for Gingrich and 11 percent for Paul.

Similarly, when New Hampshire GOP primary voters were asked which candidate had the best chance of beating Mr. Obama this November regardless of who they voted for, they named Romney by an enormous margin. Fifty-six percent of voters indicated that he had the best shot of defeating the president, compared to just 15 percent who named Paul and 11 percent who named Jon Huntsman.

Top Choice among Voters Concerned with the Economy

The economy was the most important issue to New Hampshire GOP primary voters by a wide margin. Sixty-one percent of voters indicated that the economy mattered most in deciding their vote on Tuesday. The federal budget deficit was a distant second, accounting for 24 percent of voters' decisions. Abortion and health care were named respectively by only 6 and 5 percent of voters.

Of those primary voters indicating that the economy was their most important issue, they chose Romney by a wide margin. Nearly half - 45 percent - of voters selecting their candidate based on the economy preferred Romney, compared to 21 percent who preferred Paul and 18 percent who preferred Huntsman.

Similarly, Romney was the choice among primary voters concerned about the future performance of the economy. More than two-thirds - 69 percent - of voters were very worried about the direction of the nation's economy in next few years. Among these voters, Romney topped Paul 40 percent to 24 percent.

Paul Unable to Expand Base

Paul once again attracted widespread support from young people and political independents, but showed no signs of being able to expand on this base. Amongst New Hampshire GOP primary voters 18 to 29 years of age, he defeated Romney 47 percent to 25 percent, but could not secure more than 20 percent of voters over 45 years of age. He won 32 percent of the vote from self-identified independents, but could not top 16 percent support among self-identified Republicans.

Few Evangelical Voters in the Electorate

Santorum, who nearly won the Iowa caucuses last week, finished a distant fourth in the Granite State because the core of his Iowa support - evangelical voters - comprised a much smaller proportion of the New Hampshire electorate and did not support him at nearly the same level. Evangelicals made up only 22 percent of New Hampshire voters compared to 57 percent of Iowa caucus goers. Moreover, Santorum decisively won evangelicals in Iowa 32 percent to 14 percent, while he was soundly defeated among them in New Hampshire, losing the evangelical vote to Romney 30 to 23 percent.

Why evangelicals coalesced around Rick Santorum

Santorum received little bounce from his unexpected performance in Iowa. Nearly half of New Hampshire GOP primary voters - 46 percent - decided who to vote for in the last few days of the campaign. However, only 15 percent of late deciders opted for Santorum placing him fourth behind Romney who received 32 percent, Huntsman who received 22 percent and Paul who received 19 percent.

Even Fewer Crossover Democrats

Huntsman, who bypassed Iowa and headed to New Hampshire, drew most of his support from crossover Democrats and liberals. The New Hampshire GOP primary rules enable anyone to vote regardless of their ideological leaning as long as they are not registered as a Democrat. On Tuesday, a number of left-leaning voters showed up at the polls and threw their support behind Huntsman.

One out of every 25 voters who cast a ballot in the Republican primary identified themselves as a Democrat. Huntsman received a whopping 41 percent of their support, easily defeating Paul and Romney who secured respectively 24 percent and 14 percent of their voters. Similarly, Huntsman received 25 percent support of moderate to liberal primary voters.

Poll results discussed in this article are based on a National Election Pool entrance poll conducted by Edison Media Research. Interviews were conducted with 2760 primary voters as they exited precincts around New Hampshire. The margin of error for the poll is +/-4 percentage points.

Full coverage: Campaign 2012

© 2012 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
  • Samuel J. Best

    Samuel J. Best is an Associate Professor of Political Science and the former director of the Center for Survey Research and Analysis at the University of Connecticut. He has written numerous books and articles about public opinion and electoral behavior, including Exit Polls: Surveying the American Electorate, 1972-2008, scheduled to be published by CQ Press in 2012. He holds a Ph.D. in political science from the State University New York at Stony Brook.

15 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
MrCoatsLibertyNow says:
Any potential Romney supporters out there need to watch this before voting for him:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E2h8ujX6T0A

GO DR. RON PAUL 2012!!!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
ProgressNow says:
He won because he's the least suckiest of the GOP clown show.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
occupy_cbs says:
Way to go republiCONS -- push your ultra-wealthy top 0.00001% as your "conservative" candidate, and watch the middle class completely disappear!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
occupy_cbs says:
BlameRepublicanz: "Mittens Romney plans on takingmore from the middle class to balance his budget...or he's just outright lying which is more likely."



There is no way that the poster boy of the top 1% -- willard romney who is worth close to $300 Million -- will ever help the middle class, and will only make sure that class warfare exists so that income inequality continues to increase along with the top 1% getting an ever-larger piece of the pie!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
BlameRepublicanz says:
Romney said in his speech that he wants to "cut, cap, and balance" the deficit...but he wants more military spending so "no one will test us"....sounds like Willard "Wal mart is a person" Mittens Romney plans on takingmore from the middle class to balance his budget...or he's just outright lying which is more likely.
reply
occupy_cbs replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
"Romney said in his speech that he wants to 'cut, cap, and balance' the deficit...but he wants more military spending"



Sorry willard, but by not addressing our severe revenue problem while at the same time expanding the PNAC NEOCON military-industrial complex mafia, there is NO WAY to balance the budget!
linkicon reporticon emailicon
geoffgriffin says:
Thank God for Sam Best
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
chetthor says:
It is a shame that there really isn't a good Republican candidate... the right wing supports obstructionists... and anyone that will put "hate Obama" over country.

The congress has a 9% approval rating and the people on the ballot support them.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Jhihmoac says:
Still early in the campaign...Probably around Super Tuesday (03-06), the rivals' muck-raking weaponry will be fully functional :P
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
venusvegasvada says:
How can any one of them hope to win the Presidency unless they can get some Democratic voters to come over to their camp? They have to pick up some from the middle to win.

Unfortunately I don't see that happening. On the issues of the tax imbalance of the Rich vs everyone else, doing away with Social Security and Medicare/Medicaid, all of these Republican candidates have the same story- No new taxes for the Rich. If your 54 and under you can kiss SS, Medicare and Medicaid goodbye. These issues cut directly into the heart of the middle class and they are not asleep this election. Don't get me started on off-shoring jobs.

I think the Republicans are underestimating the seriousness of all these issues. Without one of them breaking camp and softening on SS, Medicare/Medicaid and increasing the taxes on the Rich and eliminating Corp tax loopholes, they can forget the middle class supporting them.
reply
ThinkingFromTheGoldenRule replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Only Ron Paul offers solutions to the root problems, and so his message goes beyond the two-party dialogue spoon-fed by the electioneering media. He is not bought and paid for like the corporate candidates we are being sold.

He also appeals to both sides on many issues, and is the most consistent candidate.

Please understand his message.

restore the built-in safeguards of the constitution
individualism instead of collectivism to ensure equal rights
limited, transparent government instead of too-big-to-fail government (which has been turned into a business)
phase out entitlement programs, entitlements are neither rights, nor fair. the government should not steal money from people that could be used to help their neighbor to pay for bloated, ineffectual centralized bureaucracies. if the nationally syndicated corporate media chose to benefit society instead of maximizing stockholder revenue, investigative journalism could call attention to charity cases and stir the national conscience instead of scrambling the issues.

if you live in the US, they will come to your door for money. soon, the whole world
linkicon reporticon emailicon
SpittinBullitz says:
You can't trust Romney because he belongs to a religion that turns a blind-eye on the abuse of innocent women and children. Mormons raise tens of millions of dollars to fight same-sex marriage and ignore tens of thousands of corrupt polygamists in their own backyard. Get a copy of the film Banking On Heaven (many libraries carry it) and you'll see what I'm talking about. There are hundreds of abusive polygamous Mormon sects living off taxpayers and abusing women and children. I would never vote for a Mormon.
reply
spacengin replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
I am a non-Mormon in Mormondom and live near quite a few polygamists. Among the ones I know, they seem like typical Americans. There is no abuse that we have been able to detect. Huntsman did a lot of good things which were contrary to traditional approaches. It was very positive. The Mormon that followed rolled back many of his improvements. I found Romney's victory speech to be hollow in demonstrating understanding of key issues. So how does he expect to accomplish all those goals without busting the budget? I get no sense of balance from him. Its just more Republican BS that will screw the middle class.
See all 15 Comments