Political Hotsheet
By

Corbett B. Daly /

CBS News/ January 9, 2012, 9:37 AM

Romney's role at Bain under fire

Romney leads among GOP voters in N.H.

Mitt Romney points as New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie claps at right during a campaign rally in Exeter, N.H., Jan. 8, 2012.

/ AP Photo/Elise Amendola

UPDATED 1:02 p.m. ET

On the eve of the New Hampshire primary, Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney is getting attacked by opponents looking to be the clear alternative to the former Massachusetts governor.

Romney is widely expected to win New Hampshire Tuesday, but the race for runner-up among former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum, Texas Rep. Ron Paul and even former Utah Gov. Jon Huntsman is heating up.

Romney has been having trouble garnering more than 25 percent of the vote and the other candidates have been splitting support of conservative Republican voters looking for someone else, but he got some welcome news last week in South Carolina, which holds its primary January 21.

Romney took the lead in the Palmetto state with 37 percent support in the latest CNN/Time/ORC poll released last week and many analysts expect that if Romney wins the first three contests -- he won Iowa last week -- it could become almost impossible for one of his rivals to catch up.

A group supporting Gingrich plans a major television advertising blitz in the Palmetto state, hitting Romney for his record as the head of Bain Capital for the investment firm's first 15 years through 1999. More than $3 million of radio and television ads, first reported by the New York Times, could go a long way in South Carolina, which has picked the eventual Republican nominee in every primary since 1980.

The ads claim that Romney destroyed communities when Bain invested in companies that later shed workers and some even went bankrupt, a charge which had been most often heard from Democrats, not fellow Republicans.

Meanwhile, the Wall Street Journal published a story Monday that attempts to provide a more comprehensive assessment of his tenure at the helm of Bain.

The Journal said a key finding of its analysis was that "Bain produced stellar returns for its investors--yet the bulk of these came from just a small number of its investments. Ten deals produced more than 70 percent of the dollar gains." And four of the ten firms that produced the biggest gains for Bain investors ended up in bankruptcy court.

Of the 77 firms the Journal looked at, about 22 percent of them either reorganized under bankruptcy protection or shuttered altogether within eight years of Bain's initial investment.

The newspaper noted that supporters of Bain say it is unfair to look at the record after eight years, because in many cases the company had either gone public or been sold by then.

But politically, it could be a problem for Romney because Gingrich has decided to push the issue hard. On Sunday, the former House speaker said the firm was comprised of "rich people finding clever legal ways to loot a company."

Romney is pushing back, but he may have created a gaffe of his own in doing so.

On Monday, he said he likes being able to "fire people" who are not up to the job.

He was explaining why he thinks it is better for individuals to have their own insurance because the insurance company can be fired if the services provided are not adequate.

"I want individuals to have their own insurance that means the insurance company will have an incentive to keep you healthy it also means if you don't like what they do you can fire them. I like being able to fire people who provide services to me," he said at a breakfast at the Chamber of Commerce in Nashua, New Hampshire.

"You know if someone doesn't give me a good service that I need I want to say I'm going to go get someone else to provide that service to me," he said.

Full CBS News coverage: Mitt Romney

© 2012 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
14 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
luadda22 says:
by economicterror January 9, 2012 1:13 PM EST
Sources, luddite???????????????

We'll wait.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Why don't you spend some time looking it up yourself?? I'll give you a hint, part of it came from University of Chicago. Otherwise. I'm not your research chump.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
sandy 1027 says:
Unlike the president, and even his GOP rivals, there is something inauthentic and unsettling about Mitt Romney.He has changed his position on almost every major issue within the last 7 or 8 years, seemingly for political advantage; and his time at Bain is a mixed bag.He was successful there, but many times, at the expense of mid and lower-level employees' jobs, shipping many abroad ( which is one of the reasons that our country is hurting now, economically.It's good for corporations and investors, but not always for America, as a whole) .It makes one seriously wonder how much trust should be placed in him.
reply
PGG1 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Honestly, Bill Clinton changed his position on plenty of big issues, going from Hillarycare to "the era of big government is over" in the span of, what, two years? Still, I would say he was a far better president than the two that came after him. Maybe it's not such a horrible thing to have a president who can recognize when the country is not with him and adapt accordingly. It seemed to work better than having these "men of convictions" who just plow ahead with bad ideas no matter what, thinking that it shows good character because they're sticking to their guns.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
PGG1 says:
Comments from people trying to latch on to this are bordering on the absurd. I don't think there's a venture capital firm out there that would claim 100% success in rehabbing every failing company it took over, and certainly not without shedding jobs to do so. Didn't Bain invest in Dominos Pizza and Staples while Romney was there? How many thousands and thousands of jobs have those two companies alone created since then?

From what I understand, Bain took on companies on the verge of bankruptcy and attempted to turn them around so they could spin the company off for a profit later. Companies aren't going bankrupt because they are managing their income and expenses well. It is very naive to think no one will lose their job in cases like that.

If anyone's ever worked at a company that was in trouble and re-emerged later in better shape, we all know you have fewer workers at the end of the process than you did at the start. Many times that includes both workers and management, especially if ownership changes in that time, and especially if that ownership change is a venture capital firm looking to spin you off again later. I've been through it. It's not fun. I've seen capable co-workers shown the door because of bad decisions made way over their heads. Is it fair? No, but at the end of the day, the company survived, those of us left kept our jobs, and we began hiring again when our outlook improved. I don't blame the folks that took us over while we were failing for having to cut expenses. I blame the folks who put us in that position in the first place.

When it doesn't work, it's not a surprise that Bain comes out of it without taking a hard hit, or even a profit once they sell off the assets. Their job is to identify low risk, high reward opportunities. If it doesn't work, no harm to them. If it does, they make a lot of money. They're not a charity.

If they were taking healthy companies, raiding them and firing everyone, I'd understand the big story and fake outrage from people who were never going to vote for Romney to begin with. But if the worst people can come with about him after all this time in the spotlight is he did not save every job and every failing company while at Bain Capital, then he'll sail through this election season unscathed. By most measures, his time there was a success and he's made no secret of the fact that sometimes it didn't work out for the acquired companies.
reply
sandy 1027 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
I am an independent, who has , in the past, voted for Republicans and Democrats.I understand that in the business sector there are hard decisions that have to be made for a company's prosperity and even viability.For myself, this is about deeper issues than Mitt Romney's job performance at Bain, however, the media should scrutinize what he actually did( and I don't think that anyone is accusing him of illegalities),his attitudes about outsourcing,etc. because we are not just picking an investment or efficiency expert, but we need a president who will understand the complexities of being in that office, and the balancing act involved.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
luadda22 says:
by newsieee January 9, 2012 10:10 AM EST
ROMNEY'S "Business experience" consisted of buying companies, laying off workers, stripping pension funds, and taking the companies public again - 80% of which shortly went bankrupt.
===================================================================

Your wrong, it was only around 12%. Even taking it out eight years after Bain (Bain had already sold many of the companies) invested in the companies, it's only 22%.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Smail_Buzzby says:
I think we can all agree that Romney sucks. Or at least we can all 75% agree that he sucks. He looks distinguished enough in pictures, but there is something totally sleazy and plastic about him on video that does not work. His record is lousy with greed - he is the product of our 'crank out a mess of lawyers and MBAs and see what happens' business culture. He is an example of what went wrong with America - a clear illustration of how some people get stupid rich doing nothing productive while most of us labor our entire lives and never even know security.
Plenty of people are angry and disappointed with Obama, but what choices do we have?
Romney, yuck! No, thank you. This has been covered. He will be the Republican candidate that no one wanted.
Gingrich? Are you serious? This guy is a walking bomb looking for the place he can do the most damage. He is fat and mean and a hypocrite and a liar. And I think he might be mentally handicapped. Listen to him speak for awhile and judge for yourself. I really do not like the Stay-Puft wife-leaving FannieMaeFreddieMac millionaire.
Santorum? I guess, if we all want to live in some crazy bible-thumping racist hateful and fearful FoxNews version of America Santorum would be great. Good thing for the rest of us that only the Southern states and a few mid-western wasteland states buy this garbage. After the North won the Civil War they should have liberated all the slaves and then cut the South loose. Told them that they could not have slaves and were not part of the US. If only - we could be torturing terrorists from Alabama instead of Afghanistan!
Ron Paul looks like a shriveled up prune. He says some very good things and then immediately after that says some criminally insane things. He is consistent. Consistently annoying and undignified and all over the place. He is right that we should stop giving out foreign aid like it is candy. And we should DEFINITELY CUT OFF ISRAEL. They are a very wealthy country and they are not our ally...why are we giving them billions of dollars in aid and weapons every year? Billions of dollars that we have to borrow from China?
Huntsman? He will probably get some press now that Newt is fading and Santorum is blowing his 15 seconds of fame. Huntsman shares the big Mormon problem with Romney so the Santorum crowd that 'just wants their America bayaaack!' won't care for him.
So down to the wire it looks like a brief surge for Huntsman (we get to know him a little bit and realize that we don't like or trust him either) and then everyone grumbles, grits their teeth and says, 'Romney'?
Ooops, I nearly forgot why I was writing all of this silliness - Sarah Palin and Donald Trump to the rescue...Pal-Rump! Tr-alin?
reply
luadda22 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
We get it!! (You would never vote Republican anyway). So instead of running them down (with simpleton hate), why don't you tell us how great the person is that you are going to vote for? I'll bet that would be a big problem for you also.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
bobcal84 says:
A venture capital company will on average have one "home run" out of 10 investments.

An excellent question was posed by Chris Wallace yesterday on "Fox News Sunday" - (paraphrased) If Gov. Romney is responsible for the performance of all the companies that Bain Capital invested in during his time as CEO, then is Pres. Obama not responsible for his administration's $500 million investment in Solyndra, which went into bancruptcy?
reply
tonyatq replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
It would be different if Romney hadn't given the people pink slip while he made millions. If the company fails than the CEO should not get a dime.
jimbom121 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Did Obama take over management of the firm?
linkicon reporticon emailicon
DF68 says:
After the light shed on Bain Capital, "The Dark Knight Rises" might be more than just a movie this election year.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
moonglowsun says:
Gov Christy ought to focus on NJ and take his "attitude" elsewhere. This is an election and the voters have every right to comment of the voracity of the candidate's statements and ideologies. His arrogance is unnerving and unappreciated. How NJ ever voted this baffoon into office is beyond my comprehension. He'd do better to imitate Jackie Gleason on stage...he seems to be better suited to ressurect the Honeymooner series than to lead a State let alone a Nation.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
JamesChoie says:
Romney went for the kill and made a killing on his investments and couldn't care less what happened to the workers. It just gets highlighted when you run for President.
reply
See all 14 Comments
Scroll Left Scroll Right