Political Hotsheet
By

Tucker Reals /

CBS News/ January 9, 2012, 7:00 AM

Poll: Romney leads, Santorum surges into top 3

Updated 10:50 a.m. ET

CBS News Poll analysis by the CBS News Polling Unit: Sarah Dutton, Jennifer De Pinto, Fred Backus and Anthony Salvanto.

On the heels of the Iowa caucuses last week, Mitt Romney now leads the field of Republican presidential candidates. Newt Gingrich is in second place, and Rick Santorum has leapt into the top tier and is now right behind Gingrich in the latest CBS News national poll.

In the race for the nomination, 19 percent of Republican primary voters support Romney, followed by Gingrich with 15 percent, and Santorum right behind him with 14 percent. This is an increase of 11 points for Santorum since last month, but a five point decline for Gingrich.

When voters who chose someone else are asked to choose a candidate from the current field, the race remains similar: Romney leads with 24 percent, followed by Santorum and Gingrich, each with 18 percent.

Each of the candidates receives their support from different factions of the Republican Party. Romney's core backing comes primarily from moderates, women and non-Tea Party supporters, while Santorum's support comes from evangelicals and voters who are very conservative, the poll shows.

Poll shows GOP voters still looking for answers

Gingrich seems to be losing some of his traction with Tea Party-supporters to Santorum - a social-values conservative from Pennsylvania.

While Santorum and Gingrich are now tied among Republican primary voters who support the Tea Party movement, Gingrich led this group by 16 points as recently as December. White evangelicals now seem to firmly back Santorum in this race.

However, while Santorum leads among Republican voters who identify themselves as very conservative, Gingrich is ahead among those who say they are only somewhat conservative.

Romney and Santorum bring different perceived strengths to the race as well. Romney is viewed as most electable (and most likely to be the eventual nominee), while Santorum is seen as the candidate who best represents these voters' values - up 17 points since November. Romney is right behind him on this measure.

After his narrow victory in Iowa, 55 percent of Republican primary voters now expect Romney to eventually become the Republican nominee for president - far ahead of any other candidate. Registered voters nationwide agree.

When asked directly which candidate has the best chance of beating President Obama in the national elections this November, Romney remains at the top of the list - and has gained on the other candidates in the last month.

Now, 49 percent say Romney has the best chance of winning over the incumbent Democrat, up from 37 percent in December.

Gingrich has dropped sharply on this measure, from 31 percent last month to just 13 percent now.

Meanwhile, Santorum has resonated with voters when it comes to his values. Santorum is now at the top of the list of candidates who best represents Republican primary voters' values with 22 percent, rising 17 points on this measure since November. Santorum is closely followed by Mitt Romney at 21 percent, and then Gingrich 14 percent, Paul at 13 percent, Perry at 6 percent and Huntsman at 3 percent.

It is important to note, however, that nationally, the race for the Republican nomination remains extremely fluid. Most voters have not completely settled on their candidate.

Even among Republican voters who do pick a candidate, seven in 10 say it's still too early to say whether their mind is really made up.

Read the complete poll (PDF)


This poll was conducted by telephone from January 4-8, 2012 among 1,413 adults nationwide.

1,247 interviews were conducted with registered voters and 440 with voters who said they plan to vote in a Republican primary. Phone numbers were dialed from samples of both standard land-line and cell phones. The error due to sampling for results based on the entire sample could be plus or minus three percentage points. The margin of error for the sample of registered voters could be plus or minus three points and five points for the sample of Republican primary voters. The error for subgroups may be higher. This poll release conforms to the Standards of Disclosure of the National Council on Public Polls.

© 2012 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
  • Tucker Reals

    Tucker Reals is the CBSNews.com foreign editor, based at the CBS News London bureau.

74 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
bluetruckinla says:
You got to be kidding ! I heard it before in the Kennedy - Nixon race but I am still shocked to hear " I am voting for him because he is handsome" . Wake up lady ! If Mitt Romney looks like Barbie's Ken that does NOT qualify Mitt Romney to be President of The United States.

Additionally pollster Towery said Gingrich is doing "substantially better" with men than Romney, 38 to 28, but the former House Speaker still faces a "gender gap," as women are still favoring Romney.

Please Ladies think about this. Ken Oups ! I mean Mitt Romney was empty whole companies into his pockets putting working women and men into the streets. Then sent their jobs to China and Mexico. Mitt Romney was also raided retirement funds and put the money in his pockets also robbing women and men of security in their Golden Years. Mitt Romeny is receiving the working women and men sweat and blood at a rate of over $51,000 DOLLARS a DAY as income !!!!! Anything goes to make a dollar is NOT Capitalism. The drug dealer or corporate raider are both wrong. The business venture was three separate parameters is it moral, ethical, or legal. The drug dealer is immoral and illegal. Mitt Romney is immoral and unethical. Mitt Romney is not and NEVER was in business to create jobs. Mitt Romney wants to make money and any human cost incurred is inconsequential. That includes human cost to women who think Mitt Romney should be President because he is handsome or looks like Ken.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
MrCoatsLibertyNow says:
Any potential Romney supporters out there need to watch this before voting for him:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E2h8ujX6T0A

GO DR. RON PAUL 2012!!!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
GeorgeHew says:
When you ask someone who do you think has the best chance of beating Obama, that is a ridiculous question. We are fed information that Paul, for instance, doesn't stand a chance, and so the number from this question show Paul in nearly last place. However, when you poll people asking individually which one they would support, Paul comes in a very close second to Romney only by about 1 point - and that is with most of the media pushing against Paul. In the end, Paul has proven he actually has the best shot against Obama, he can pull in independents like NO OTHER REPUBLICAN, and candidates like Romney who are seen as very similar to the incumbent lose about 95% of the time. Basically, if Paul is not the nominee, it is very unlikely that Obama will be out of the White House until after his next 4 years. There is no chance that Santorum, Gingrich, or these other guys can beat Obama.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
noloyalisti says:
The reason Obama won the Nobel Peace Prize is that after the 8 year Reign of Terror of the Bush Crime Family, he looked like such a wise, reasonable and smart man.

And since then he has done nothing except prove that he deserved it.
reply
JV1970 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
The Nobel Peace Prize isn't supposed to be given to people who look wise, reasonable and smart. It's supposed to be given to people who actually do something to earn it. When Obama was given the prize he had made a lot of promises but he had actually done nothing to earn it. He hadn't been in office long enough to do anything to earn it.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
erasmus111 says:
by JV1970 January 10, 2012 2:17 PM EST
Obama was in office less than two months when he "won" the Nobel Peace Prize. Exactly how much "hard" work could he have done on foreign policy in less than two months?


What is REALLY pathetic is the fact that Obama hadn't even sat his ass down in the Presidents chair yet, when all you haters started spewing your hatred for him. Asking why he hadn't done this, or hadn't done that. And chanting "ASSASSINATE OBAMA".

How do you condemn someone for something they haven't done when they haven't even taken the position yet?!!
reply
JV1970 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
You didn't answer my question! Exactly how did Obama earn a Nobel Peace Prize when he hadn't even been in office two months? Answer me, if you can!
HorusNoon replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
You clearly are losing grasp of the situation at hand. Obama's social corporate state has failed the people, but has worked like a charm for the international banking cartel. So, yes he is successful in that regard, but unsuccessful in regard to the US populace.

These polls are also heavily rigged and erroneous. Every independent internet poll I participate in shows Ron Paul in the lead, well ahead of Romney. Hence, these mainstream media polls are lacking in something called... objectivity.

Lastly, the reason Ron Paul is in the lead (objectively chosen by the people thus far) is because he is the only candidate who has thorough knowledge to help ease the reversal of Obama's mistakes, while also stabilizing the economy 'for the people' and corralling the Federal Reserve's cronies.

Obama means well, but his system is flawed. He is a great and stand-up guy, but philosophically his direction is flawed.

I say, Ron Paul for President 2012!

[Note: I am a democrat, but will switch to vote for Ron Paul]
linkicon reporticon emailicon
nearl451 says:
Q: What to Romney, Ken Lay, and Jeff Skilling all have in common?

A: The exhibit(exhibited in Lay's case) Corporate Psychopathy.
reply
nearl451 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Go ahead and Google it...recognize Romney's MO; then look up the history on Bain.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
noloyalisti says:
I really have no clue as to why anyone would vote for these Republicon vermin for anything. Unless you are very rich and just as greedy as they are or are completely mixed up and willing to vote to be robbed of your wealth by the Top 1%, I don't know.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
noloyalisti says:
Remember that Obama won a Nobel Peace Prize because of his hard work on foreign policy. And he has quite a task after the 8-year Reign of Terror of the Bush Crime Family.

Although Obama wants us to remain in the un-winnable quagmire of Afghanistan, he has been working to revise the unsustainable and ridiculous military budget.
reply
joyfuljoyfu1 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
You are a ball face liar.
noloyalisti replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
It's bald faced liar!
See all 6 Replies
linkicon reporticon emailicon
noloyalisti says:
The beauty of Obama governing to the right of center (although it makes progressives so angry) is that it forces these three wackos to go so far to the right they seem to be radical extremists on every issue.

It's actually brilliant strategy by Obama.
reply
JV1970 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
economicterror At least vsmit acts like an adult! His judgment is better than a nasty little pimple faced kid's anytime!
linkicon reporticon emailicon
roblearns says:
I expected Romney to get about 16% support and "lead" the pack.

At 19% he is over performing versus my expectations.

This is the front runner - we'll I guess he is. It's hard to make the argument someone else is, I guess.
reply
noloyalisti replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
DO you think these are inbreds with aliens? How else would you explain how blatantly corrupt and arrogant they are. They are still extolling all the completely failed policies of the Republicons since Reagan.
See all 74 Comments