5 things to watch in tonight's N.H. debate
Campaign signs for Republican presidential candidates line a road January 6, 2012 in Bedford, New Hampshire.
/ Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images1. Will Romney lose an eye? Not to go all Biblical here, but Newt Gingrich has signaled all week that he's out for revenge and plans to exact it from Mitt Romney. Gingrich blames Romney for his precipitous decline in the polls, saying a slew of negative ads brought him down only weeks after he was confidently predicting he would be the Republican nominee.
There are a few problems with Gingrich's narrative: He's ignoring the fact that Ron Paul's attack ads against him were in many ways more effective than Romney's. Moreover, Romney and Paul weren't blanketing the airwaves in New Hampshire and South Carolina - the ads ran in Iowa - and yet Gingrich plummeted in the polls in those states, too. That suggests it was Gingrich who hurt himself in the rest of the country. He repeatedly whined about the ads in countless interviews and speeches, and he came across as an angry Washington politician. But why let the facts get in his way? Gingrich appears to be a man on a mission - or, as Chris Wallace told Sean Hannity, he's going to strap on the hockey mask and fire up the chain saw.
2. If Gingrich goes all "Friday the 13th," will it backfire? If he's going eye-for-eye with Romney, he shouldn't forget the old saying: Before you embark on a journey of revenge, dig two graves. Gingrich shot up in the polls after impressive debate performances. His best applause lines came when he chastised debate moderators and the liberal media for trying to encourage the Republicans to fight. He defended his competitors, saying they all would be better than Barack Obama. He espoused big ideas and sounded smart, and Republican voters responded. They want bold ideas, they want positive messages, and above all, they don't want to see Republicans attacking Republicans. The main goal of the Republican primary voter is to beat President Obama. That's the one thing that unites every Republican, and the candidate who delivers the best attack on President Obama and on Washington wins.
Somewhere along the way, Gingrich forgot that. His performances this week suggest he won't remember it by tonight, either -- and that could hurt him as much (or more) than it hurts Romney, especially if Romney stays positive and deflects the blows by focusing on his ideas and on hammering President Obama.
3. How will Rick Santorum attack Romney? Coming off his big win in Iowa (and it was a win even if he did lose by eight votes), Santorum will be standing center stage next to the frontrunner. No longer is he stuck on the end, trying to elbow his way into the conversation. He has an opportunity to solidify his new status as the anti-Romney candidate and build momentum for South Carolina and beyond.
In many ways, this debate is more about South Carolina than New Hampshire, and Santorum has an opportunity to contrast himself with Romney and make the case to voters that he is the best candidate to beat Obama. In previous debates, Santorum has shown he can effectively throw a punch on a wide range of issues, from Iran to immigration. When Tim Pawlenty pulled his punches with Romney on "Obamneycare" (which led to the implosion of his campaign), Santorum jumped in and started pounding. The challenge for Santorum is how he throws the punch.
As we said, Gingrich's downfall came after he was seen as an angry politician. Santorum has to give a more hopeful message, as he did in his victory speech in Iowa. Will he come across as negative, or will he make it a contrast between Romney's views and record and his own, more solidly conservative ideas? That's a subtle, but critical, distinction.
4. How will Romney respond? So far, Romney has weathered the attacks by staying positive and keeping his focus on President Obama. In speeches and rallies, he doesn't mention his opponents by name, and instead delivers an anti-Obama message more focused on the general election. That's worked well for him, and he's likely to continue to deflect the attacks by stressing what he sees as his strengths: Creating jobs and rebuilding the economy.
He may throw a few counterpunches at "career politicians," but will he hit harder? I doubt it. His best strategy is to rise above it, be the referee who protects the other candidates from the media elite that Republican voters instinctively distrust and dislike. It was Gingrich's old role, and it could get Romney a lot of support (as it did for Gingrich).
5. Will the anti-Romneys attack Santorum? The fight now is for second place, to be the alternative to Romney. Rick Perry and Newt Gingrich have to slow Santorum's momentum and raise questions with voters over his qualifications and electability. Gingrich already has been dismissive, calling him a "junior partner." It's trickier for Perry. He's the kind of candidate who should do well in South Carolina, and he's lined up some impressive endorsements there. But he's stumbled in debates, and he has to do something in this one to show he belongs in the top tier. He can't do that with attacks, because people won't listen.
Perry has to first reestablish his credibility on the issues. But Santorum may try to head that effort off. If he can knock Perry out, he will pick up Perry's voters and continue building a conservative coalition to challenge Romney in South Carolina and beyond.
Popular in Politics
- Michelle Obama decries "slander" that educated blacks are "trying to act white" Play Video
- Benghazi-disciplined diplomat a prolific poet
- Adviser on White House scandals: "Partisan fishing expeditions" won't distract Obama 175 Comments
- Romney condemns "breach of trust" in Washington
- Obama: Racism is no excuse for not excelling Play Video
- Republicans continue beating Benghazi drum 111 Comments
- Officials on Benghazi: "We made mistakes, but without malice"
- Obama to discuss legality of drone program
Hey Tired--that's like saying, "What Al Capone did in Chicago (on the city level), he wouldn't do on the Federal level."--ABSURD. Romney loves the Obamacare model and it is hard from him to run away from it....
--
He IS running away from it obviously. The State/Federal difference is valid and huge. The majority of Mass wanted to try it and more power to them. The majority of the US DOESN"T want anything to do with it and Mr Romney has acknowledged that over and over.
On the other hand I agree with many posting here, Ron Paul is our best bet.
And PS Bringing up Chicago criminality is probably not the best way to support President Obama.
Hey Tired--that's like saying, "What Al Capone did in Chicago (on the city level), he wouldn't do on the Federal level."--ABSURD. Romney loves the Obamacare model and it is hard from him to run away from it....
----------------------------------------
have you listened to Romney? NO, you are to busy spewing the same BS day in day out. What is ABSURD is the idea that you can't see the difference
Sorry bubba, but the reality of the situation doesn't agree with your incessant political rhetoric!
2010 -- 943,000 private-sector jobs created
2011 -- 1.9 million private-sector jobs created -- 280,000 government jobs lost
2012 -- economists predict 2.1 million private-sector jobs created
It certainly appears that President Obama has presided over almost 3 million private-sector jobs created in just the past 2 years, while shrinking government with over 280,000 government jobs lost!
Looks like the GOP is the jobs killing party!
Wrong Jan, just two things to look for:
1) Whose nose grows the longest.
2) Who is able to talk out of both sides of their face convincingly
Read more: http://www.cbsnews.com/8601-503544_162-57354425-1.html?assetTypeId=41&blogId=503544&tag=accordionB;commentWrapper#ixzz1iofSWIYX
That would mean Obama would have to be there as well. Because EVERY POLITICIAN Does that. Why are you a fool? Obama has lied, so what is your point
Don't watch it at all.!!
As long as big business, lobbyists, drug companies and groups like PAC are allowed to make huge campaign contributions to get these people elected, we are never going to have a President, Congressman or Senator who truly has the best interests of the US and the American people at heart.