Political Hotsheet
By

Samuel J. Best /

CBS News/ January 4, 2012, 1:54 AM

Iowa caucus results: Why the race was so close

Fullwidth - 2012 - lowa Elections Mitt Romney Ron Paul Rick Santorum CBS
In the past six months, Iowa Republicans wavered repeatedly in their presidential preferences, sending six different candidates to the top of the pre-election polls in the Hawkeye state. Tuesday night seemingly failed to bring any greater clarity to their preferences as three different candidates -Mitt Romney, Rick Santorum and Ron Paul - finished neck and neck in the Iowa Republican presidential caucuses.

According to a CBS News poll of voters entering the caucuses, however, each of these candidates forged a markedly distinct constituency. If these bases hold up moving forward, it could be quite a competitive race for the Republican nomination.

Full Iowa results
Full Iowa entrance poll results

Mainstream Republicans

Mitt Romney assembled a coalition of older, wealthier, more temperate Republicans who cared much more about winning the general election than his conservative credentials or religious background.

Romney was the preferred choice among mainstream Republicans. A third of Iowa caucus goers were self-identified Republicans who considered themselves somewhat conservative or moderate on political matters. Romney won a sizable plurality of these groups, receiving support from 37 percent of somewhat conservative Republican voters and 48 percent from moderate Republican voters. This bodes well for Romney in upcoming contests with less conservative Republican electorates than Iowa, such as Florida and Nevada.

Romney received strong support from wealthy voters. Among those 27 percent of caucus goers with family incomes of $100,000 or more, Romney won 36 percent support. This far surpassed the support of Santorum his closest competitor who received only 23 percent of their vote.

Romney also received solid backing from senior caucus goers. Of the quarter of attendees who were 65 years of age and older, Romney garnered 32 percent of their votes. This easily outpaced Rick Santorum and New Gingrich who secured respectively 19 and 17 percent of their vote.

Romney's appeal was clearly driven by perceptions that he can win the general election. Of all the candidates on the ballot, a greater proportion of Romney's supporters - 63 percent - indicated that his ability to defeat Barack Obama was his most important candidate quality. Twenty-two percent cited his experience as the candidate quality that mattered most in their vote for him, 11 percent cited his moral character, and only 1 percent cited his conservatism.

Romney remains unloved -- but it's his race to lose
Full CBS News coverage: Mitt Romney

Evangelicals and Tea Partiers

Rick Santorum drew his support primarily from evangelicals and Tea Partiers, the two most hotly contested groups during the campaign. More than half of Iowa caucus-goers - 58 percent - described themselves as born-again or evangelical Christian. Of these Santorum secured 32 percent of their support, the only candidate to top 20 percent. Although nowhere near the 46 percent received by Mike Huckabee, it still proved enough to push him to the forefront Tuesday night. If Santorum can unite the support of evangelicals in upcoming states, such as South Carolina and Missouri, he will continue to be a formidable opponent.

Santorum also did quite well with voters identifying with the Tea Party. Among Iowa caucus goers, 34 percent strongly supported the Tea Party movement. Santorum secured 30 percent of their votes, easily outpacing Newt Gingrich who received 17 percent of their support.

Santorum's supporters were clearly attracted by his religious character. Roughly a third (32 percent) of his supporters reported his position on abortion mattered more than any other issue in their vote. Moreover, 40 percent of his supporters identified his strong moral character as the candidate quality that mattered most to them. No other candidate topped these numbers on either measure.

Full CBS News coverage: Rick Santorum

The Young and the Restless

Ron Paul's libertarian, isolationist message appealed to young and independent voters on Tuesday night. Paul was the preferred choice of young people, who comprised 31 percent of caucus goers. He was backed by 48 percent of those under 30 years of age. Among Gen X-ers - those caucus goers between 30 and 44 years of age - Paul won a plurality, receiving 28 percent of the vote.

Similarly, Paul won the support of the 38 percent of voters attending their first Iowa Republican presidential caucus. He received 34 percent support from first time caucus-goers, easily outpacing Santorum and Romney who received respectively 22 percent and 17 percent support.

Paul also attracted considerable backing from self-identified independents. Independents comprised nearly a quarter - 23 percent - of caucus-goers. Paul won a whopping 44 percent support from them, compared to only 18 percent for Romney and 13 percent for Santorum.

Although few political observers give Paul much of a chance to be the Republican nominee, it was this combination of young and independent voters that propelled Barack Obama to victory in Iowa and eventually the Democratic Party nomination in 2008. It is worth noting that Ron Paul had the most passionate support of any of the candidates Tuesday night. Nearly three quarters (73 percent) of his voters strongly favored him, compared to 63 percent for Santorum, 62 percent for Perry, 58 percent for Gingrich and only 56 percent for Romney.

Full CBS News coverage: Ron Paul


Iowa's bad track record for picking GOP winners
Full GOP Primary Results

Poll results discussed in this article are based on a National Election Pool entrance poll conducted by Edison Media Research. Interviews were conducted with 1737 caucus attendees as they entered caucus sites around the state. The margin of error for the poll is +/-2 percentage points.

25 Photos

Inside the Iowa caucuses

© 2012 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
  • Samuel J. Best

    Samuel J. Best is an Associate Professor of Political Science and the former director of the Center for Survey Research and Analysis at the University of Connecticut. He has written numerous books and articles about public opinion and electoral behavior, including Exit Polls: Surveying the American Electorate, 1972-2008, scheduled to be published by CQ Press in 2012. He holds a Ph.D. in political science from the State University New York at Stony Brook.

36 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
mr1ncredible says:
That's "non-interventionist" foreign policy, not "isolationist". An isolationist nation is best represented by North Korea. A non-interventionist nation could be best represented by the Swiss... who doesn't like the swiss? Why are we building up other nations while letting ours fall apart, i.e. U.S. infrastructure?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Dialogos says:
Iowa was rigged by the state GOP. The Iowa GOP did every thing it could to derail the possibility of Ron Paul winning in Iowa. The GOP even counted the results in a secret location and brokered last minute deals with local religious leaders to push the vote for Santorum. One MAJOR issue here. Our freedoms and the economy are doomed with more Neo-Con leaders like Romney, Santorum and Obama.

One question folks. Which candidate sponsored audit legislation (HR 1207) that lead to the exposing the 16 TRILLION dollars in secret Federal Reserve bailouts to banks and foreign corporations in 2010? His name is Dr. Ron Paul!!!!! $16 Trillion is more than our entire $15 trillion national debt. This is why the Wall Street establishment wants you to vote for someone else. Wake Up!!!!

Ron Paul has warned his supporters for three decades and more about the dangers of a fraudulent fractional reserve banking system in the hands of private central bankers, and no one can legitimately argue any longer that those concerns have not been justified.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
mrgnomeblog says:
Samuel, I would not regard Ron Paul an "isolationist," rather he's a non-interventionist. Wouldn't you agree?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
14FREEK says:
there isn't enough support for any of them to beat the others outright. which means none of them can beat obama. I have said it before since McCain beat out Romney last election and obama beat McCain Obama is giong to beat Rmeny. It is siple logical deduction. And this time the democrats know more about obama-osamma bin laden, just keep up with osama bin laden for the next 10 months and NO republican is going to displace bama much less any of these one-third almost likes them candidates. I know it is late but you republians need to find a GOOD candidate SOON.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
oldman67 says:
watch youtube: Fall of The Republic-The Presidency of Barac. Count the number of campaign promise he has kept. youtube: Core of Corruption: In the Shadows Full Length 2:27:46
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
scott5044 says:
i think the bigger story is,,there are 2 million of voting age
in iowa,,,the weather was perfect,,,,so what is all the hype
of only 110,000 voters showing up to vote,,,,republican ought to
be ashamed for drawing less than 5 % of the voters,,,maybe there is a different problem for candidates other than what news is broadcasting
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
CAJustin says:
If you add up all the votes for all the candidates, including undecided voters, you will come up with such a small number of Iowans taking part in the process. In a state of around 3 million only about 120 odd thousand votes. In other words, no wonder the caucuses have such a bad track record of picking the next candidate. It is such a tiny fraction of the voting public. Iowans don't seem to care, so why should we? We need to end this silliness, and stop reporting so much on these caucuses. Do we really need to watch or read about the Iowa caucuses for weeks upon weeks? Winning the Iowa Caucuses is like winning the "Most Popular Vote" in your high school yearbook.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
bluesky71 says:
"Romney received strong support from wealthy voters. Among those 27 percent of caucus goers with family incomes of $100,000 or more, Romney won 36 percent support. This far surpassed the support of Santorum his closest competitor who received only 23 percent of their vote."

Comment #1: Having an annual income of $100M does not make an individual wealthy.
Comment #2: I'd like to know the source of this information, and how it was obtained. I'm skeptical about its accuracy.
Comment #3: Reporters don't seem to make this type of observation after Democrat causes / primaries, even though there are lots of Democrat voters with incomes over $100M.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
GetAGrip007 says:
Apparently pig farmers are suffering a huge case of homophobia. Santorum knows exactly what he's doing!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Jaylah54 says:
Why so close? Because the Republican Party is still fatally fractured.

They'd do far better to throw the red-headed stepchild (the TeaBaggers) out on their ears, and make them stand alone. The TeaBaggers politics are, in the most part, directly opposed to those of the Republican Party. However, they also know that, if they did that, they wouldn't even come close to being able to collect enough votes to win a general election.

So the "true" Republican candidates have to at least pretend to pander to the TeaBagger interests. But you can't really support two diametrically opposed positions. A truly moderate Republican candidate might stand a fairly good chance of beating President Obama in November, 2012. But no Republican candidate can actually hold a truly moderate stance, because they have to pander to the TeaBaggers if they hope to win enough votes.
reply
See all 36 Comments
Scroll Left Scroll Right