Occupy Iowa: We aren't trying to disrupt caucuses
The scene inside the Occupy Iowa Caucuses headquarters.
/ CBS/Brian MontopoliOn Thursday night - after protesters lined up for free food provided with donations to the movement - occupiers gathered for a performance and civil rights panel that attracted perhaps 70 occupiers. (A small occupy tent city has been set up a few blocks away, though protesters spent $1,000 to rent the indoor space for the week.) About five hours earlier, 12 occupiers had been arrested at the Iowa Democratic Party headquarters after they refused to move out from in front of the front door of the building, including a 14-year-old who was released into the custody of her father.
The occupiers don't see much distinction between the Democratic and Republican parties, though the fact that President Obama is effectively unopposed for reelection gives them little in the way of targets on the Democratic side. Emily Allison of Des Moines, who was among those arrested Thursday, said she felt "betrayed" by Mr. Obama for his unwillingness to veto the National Defense Authorization Act and for not closing the Guantanamo Bay prison facility.
"I thought he would stand up for the people," she said. Allison, who was charged with criminal trespassing. She described Democrats as the "lesser of two evils" - but added that "after seeing all the money that Obama has accepted from the corporations and the bankers it's difficult to distinguish the parties as two different things."
Another view inside the headquarters for the Occupy Iowa Caucuses movement.
/ CBS/Brian Montopoli"The main goal is to draw that connection between the corrupt culture on Wall Street and the corrupt political culture in Washington DC," says Ed Fallon, a radio host and former Iowa Assemblyman who has emerged as one of the leaders of the movement in Iowa.
Fallon says Iowa Republicans have falsely cast the occupiers as agitators who plan to disrupt the protests in an effort to "mislead the country."
Iowa Republican Chairman Matt Strawn criticized the movement in an interview with CBS News earlier this week.
"There's really no more grassroots process in American politics than the Iowa caucuses," he said. "So it's a little puzzling why they'd choose to disrupt that process." The Iowa GOP said this week it was moving the caucus vote counting process to an "undisclosed location" due to expected occupy disruptions, and is coordinating with local law enforcement to ensure the integrity of the caucuses.
What happens if Ron Paul wins Iowa?
In Iowa, Romney peaking at just the right time
Fallon dismissed Strawn's concerns, saying, "We have made it emphatically clear over and over again that we have no plans to disrupt the process on January 3." Indeed, many occupiers say they plan to participate in the caucuses - but vote "uncommitted" as a protest against what they see as a corrupt political system.
That isn't to say they aren't trying to disrupt the candidate events going on around the state this week. On Wednesday, five aggressively interrupted a Ron Paul appearance, including a 16-year-old girl who forcefully ripped down the Paul signs that the Texas congressman's supporters put up to block her. (In response, Paul, who has offered qualified support to the occupy movement, commented on how "wonderful" he finds freedom of speech.) Seven occupy protesters were arrested at Mitt Romney's Des Moines headquarters the same day, where they were protesting the candidate's ties to nearby Wells Fargo bank, and five were arrested Thursday at Paul's campaign headquarters, where they were protesting Paul's proposal to eliminate the Environmental Protection Agency.
Right up until the Jan. 3 caucuses, the occupiers are vowing to "chase the candidates and their Wall Street cronies around the state of Iowa, dogging their heels at all their black-tie dinners and staged media events, drowning out their empty rhetoric with the strong, clear message of the 99%," according to the Occupy Iowa Caucuses website.
Fallon said the movement simply wants to "call them out" - both Republicans and Democrats - for ignoring the needs of the many to favor the wealthy few.
"The opposition is trying to characterize the movement as a bunch of disgruntled renegades who are unwashed and uninformed," he said. "It's a game they're playing to hype up opposition to what the movement is all about."
Occupy protests: Month 3
Popular in Politics
- Michelle Obama decries "slander" that educated blacks are "trying to act white" Play Video
- Immigration bill would require fingerprinting at 30 airports
- Top Obama officials knew about IRS probe, says WH
- Va. GOP candidate: Planned Parenthood "more lethal" for blacks than KKK 681 Comments
- Both parties vow to "get to the bottom" of IRS scandal 277 Comments
- Republicans continue beating Benghazi drum 470 Comments
- Adviser on White House scandals: "Partisan fishing expeditions" won't distract Obama 211 Comments
- Romney condemns "breach of trust" in Washington 251 Comments













Perhaps to an uneducated OWS'er, it might seem like Corporations act with greed but really, the primary job of the corporation is to increase shareholder wealth. Therefore, corporations act accordingly and pursue whatever opportunity will accomplish that goal. To do otherwise would result in an executive or board member looking for a job because they would be replaced by someone who would accomplish the goal. And they would be replace by who? The Shareholders. So to demonize corporations doesn't really make sense. I don't really understand what OWS is doing. I don't think what they want exists in this reality. Maybe they can create a new type of company that does not have to compete in a marketplace and does not need to be profitable but will provide tons and tons of jobs. That would be real helpful.
This President got me into my first home. Qualify him as worst President in Modern history. I bought and live in my first home and it feels pretty good to me. What did he do to you that justifies you saying he's the worst? Don't forget the Vietnam war and Iran Hostage crisis are in the modern history and oh yes Watergate.
===================================================================
How did this pesident get you in a house??? He co-sign for you?
Vietnam war?? Democrat - Kennedy
Hostage crisis? Democrat - Carter
As far as Watergate, it pales next to "Fast & Furious" (nobody died in Watergate). Democrat - Obama
When will people learn this is what causes the problems in government.
How can any sensible person, support that?