December 29, 2011 9:16 AM

Young Ron Paul volunteers descend on Iowa

By
Scott Conroy
Topics
Campaign 2012

Supporters of Republican presidential candidate, Texas Rep. Ron Paul

(Credit: Charles Dharapak)

This article originally appeared on RealClearPolitics.

NEWTON, Iowa -- As they waited for a bus dubbed the "Constitution Coach" to pick them up at the Des Moines airport and bring them to their makeshift lodgings late Tuesday, about two-dozen college-aged Ron Paul volunteers mingled in the cold night air.

The sudden appearance of a reporter's notebook and tape recorder drew comments befitting a group of young people who proudly wear their skepticism on their sleeves.

"What's the article you're going to be writing, man?"

"Yeah, what's the spin, bro?"

Asked where they had flown in from, the answers ranged from California to Virginia -- with one twenty-something purporting to have made the trip from Brazil to help Paul win the Iowa caucuses on Tuesday.

Unsure of what exactly they would be assigned to do, the eager foot soldiers who had signed up online and paid their own way here said they were prepared to phone-bank, knock on doors, speak at caucus precincts, or do basically anything that is asked of them.

When a volunteer noted that he was not authorized to speak to the media, one of his new friends quickly corrected him. "No, you can," he said. "You haven't signed anything yet."

Members of the group confirmed that they were told by the campaign they would have to sign agreements that would bar them from talking to reporters. A spokesperson for the Paul campaign did not respond to an inquiry about the restriction and declined to provide an estimate of how many out-of-state volunteers were expected in Iowa down the homestretch.

Throughout a 20-minute chat about their efforts, the volunteers frequently steered the conversation back to their level of dedication.

"What other candidate has this many people coming in from out of state?" one of them asked, noting that she had raised the money for her plane ticket to Des Moines.

No one could doubt their enthusiasm, but these young supporters nonetheless face a steep challenge in building a winning coalition of rank-and-file Iowa Republicans and nontraditional caucus-goers, while avoiding comments that might turn off either group.

Though several of them were eager to extol Paul's support for drug legalization and opposition to the CIA's targeted drone strikes in Pakistan, none mentioned the candidate's pro-life credentials that have been a focal point of his TV advertising campaign here.

Still, 25-year-old Brennan Westerson of Santa Rosa, Calif., said he was confident he could help persuade traditional Republican voters here -- many of whom are firmly within the senior citizen demographic -- to get behind Paul.

"They were college kids once," he said. "We're idealistic and we have a lot of passion, and maybe since they're older, they're wanting to revisit something like that."

Westerson said that he was first drawn to Paul because "he was a Republican who was talking about the wars, and that was cool to me."

Standing beside him, a young man who first declined to give his name but then identified himself as "James Smith" interjected frequently to opine on Paul's foreign policy views. In the process, he projected unabashed confidence about how he could make the case for the libertarian-leaning Texas congressman.

"We're going to be arguing the case of liberty," he said. "It's pretty easy just to talk about being left alone."

Asked about the controversy over 1990s-era newsletters published in Paul's name that promoted extremist and racially charged views, none of the young volunteers said that the issue made them reconsider their devotion to the candidate.

"His positions are more important," one said.

Another questioned whether there was really anything anti-Semitic in the writings, as has been widely charged, noting that Paul's GOP opponents were "demonizing" the nuclear ambitions of Iran -- a country that he said merely wanted "to take control of their power, or at least not use their dirty oil, which can't be even refined into gasoline."

With less than a week to go till the caucuses, the candidate himself echoed many of his young supporters' talking points during a town-hall meeting Wednesday at the Iowa Speedway, as he was in no mood to downplay his noninterventionist foreign policy positions.

Many Iowa Republicans have warned that the more Paul talks about his beliefs on defense and international affairs, the more difficult his prospects of winning the caucuses become.

But Paul nonetheless spoke eagerly and at length on topics ranging from how the Peace Corps was not authorized by the Constitution to questioning the continued American troop presence in South Korea, despite the potentially perilous leadership transition in North Korea.

"It's time to unwind the wars," Paul said to the packed room, his voice rising with passion. "Stop the wars, stop the spending, bring our troops home."

The line earned applause from his supporters in attendance, both young and old.

But it remains to be seen how Paul's now heavily scrutinized positions on foreign policy and other hot-button issues will resonate with traditional GOP caucus-goers as they make their final decisions in the days ahead.


  • Scott Conroy

    Scott Conroy is a National Political Reporter for RealClearPolitics and a contributor for CBS News.

Add a Comment See all 217 Comments
by frankie1028 January 1, 2012 2:22 PM EST
Ron Paul supporters are Brain Washed puppets..Just like the Jim Jones brain washed puppets of the past.
Reply to this comment
by obwan222 January 1, 2012 12:50 AM EST
obwan222 - "So, let's be clear Ron Paul believes... That every state has the right to regulate the consensual sexual practices of adults in the privacy of their home."

johnsmith9875: "Yes it does..."

No, it doesn't - the Supreme Court has ruled no matter what RP thinks. The debate is over and the people won this one.
Reply to this comment
by obwan222 December 31, 2011 8:26 PM EST
Ron Paul in 2003 on The Supreme Court overturning state laws on private, consensual sexual practices, such as oral sex...

"Ridiculous as sodomy laws may be, there clearly is no right to privacy nor sodomy found anywhere in the Constitution. There are, however, states' rights - rights plainly affirmed in the Ninth and Tenth amendments. Under those amendments, the State of Texas has the right to decide for itself how to regulate social matters like sex..."

So, let's be clear Ron Paul believes...

That every state has the right to regulate the consensual sexual practices of adults in the privacy of their home.
Reply to this comment
by johnsmith9875 December 31, 2011 11:02 PM EST
Yes it does, so if a state wants to bury itself in ignorance and have people fleeing it, destroying its economy, then by all means it can pass stupid laws governing bedroom practices.
by obwan222 January 1, 2012 12:47 AM EST
obwan222 "That every state has the right to regulate the consensual sexual practices of adults in the privacy of their home."

johnsmith9875: "Yes it does..."

No, it doesn't - the Supreme Court has ruled despite what RP thinks.
by obwan222 December 31, 2011 7:23 PM EST
"This is based on the grounds that a state should not interfere in the internal politics of another state, based upon the principles of state sovereignty and self-determination."

Honestly, I don't want diplomacy practiced on the front page. I want diplomacy to be a multi-layered approach using both open statements and hidden forces.

I want a President who plays chess and not one who plays checkers. And preferably one who thinks several moves ahead.

I accept the fact that we have withdrawn our soldiers from Iraq, <wink> except for the special forces hidden in the hills and the natives that are our paid agents and the secret intelligence gatherers among the embassy staff.

I know that is not idealistic, but we don't live in an ideal world and I am willing to accept a little secrecy by my govt. in international affairs in order to promote US interests.
Reply to this comment
by 1Abdulla1 December 31, 2011 4:07 PM EST
Enough lies and deciet. America Wants and Needs Truth Honesty and Loyalty. Do Away with Warmongers. Ron Paul 2012 President. Enough Killing Human Beings around the world
Reply to this comment
by Rocko191 December 31, 2011 5:20 PM EST
Ron Pauls son is a member of the Cult, Scientology.
Ron has thousands of Cult member supporting him.
Ron has made Scientology many promises and in return he has recieved million of dollar from Cult members.
by MwSardonicus December 31, 2011 11:33 AM EST
If Ron Paul supporters have any brains all they have to do is look at the election of Obama. Not much has changed other than Healthcare and the economy in the toilet. For true change we need a president Senate and House that can negotiate, not dictate or become gridlocked. Ron Paul would have the same effect as Obama.
Reply to this comment
by fedup12 December 31, 2011 12:32 PM EST
Dude, if you want to give the Fed. both houses and a presidency then we might as well strangle the mid. class to death.

Remember Bush had both houses and about flushed us. They got everything they wanted and didnt work out too well.

Romney, Newt, Perry etal are fighting for more of what happened in the 00's.

At least if we get Obama out Paul is the only one who would make the 1%ers sacrifice also.
by schnorkies December 31, 2011 1:25 PM EST
Would you please start educating yourself b4 you spout off!
by fedup12 December 31, 2011 11:25 AM EST
HA HA HA... You go Ron Paul. You have the R establishment nervous in Iowa.

If you dont get the Republican nod go Independent!
Reply to this comment
by Sophiah2 December 31, 2011 11:13 AM EST
by CommonsenseTexan December 31, 2011 10:52 AM EST
Isolationism isn't the answer either.


Nonintervention is distinct from isolationism, the latter featuring economic nationalism (protectionism) and restrictive immigration.


Nonintervention or non-interventionism is a foreign policy which holds that political rulers should avoid alliances with other nations, but still retain diplomacy,

and avoid all wars not related to direct self-defense.


This is based on the grounds that a state should not interfere in the internal politics of another state, based upon the principles of state sovereignty and self-determination.

A similar phrase is "strategic independence".[1]

Historical examples of supporters of non-interventionism are US Presidents George Washington and Thomas Jefferson, who both favored nonintervention in European Wars while maintaining free trade.

Other proponents include United States Senator Robert Taft and United States Congressman Ron Paul.[2]





Proponents of non-interventionism distinguish their policies from isolationism through their advocacy of more open national relations, to include diplomacy and free trade.


wikipedia. org/wiki/Non-interventionism
Reply to this comment
by hypnotoad72 December 31, 2011 8:55 AM EST
Ron Paul is as much "free market" as the rest of them.

Don't expect change under his command.

Don't believe me? Spend 10 seconds doing a web search. Or are you lazy?

Let's remember some free market issues:

http://rwer.wordpress.com/2011/07/18/no-obama-we-dont-need-free-trade-agreements-with-panama-colombia-and-korea/
(and that sort of thing stems back to the 1990s and even before that...)

http://itsmyocean.org/?p=561
(if you think he'll make America energy-independent, you couldn't get any farther from the truth. All oil produced here is sold globally, and as such is at total odds with the "free market" approach.)
Reply to this comment
by viedoklis_lv December 31, 2011 9:55 AM EST
I'm talking about TSA grabbing everyone pants just like in prison, I'm talking about NDAA where everyone can be sent to jail without trial just because he is suspect. I'm talking about that US citizens are being treated like they where prisoners by default! Ron Paul would end such nonsense.

Regarding US financial crises. Well, it's much global issue - the thing is that actually there is no global economical crises. There is only economical crises in US & EU and that's because all other wolrd has turned their backs against west. Why? Because there is all necessary resources, technologies, knowledge, markets in Asia to live without US & EU which can't offer to world nothing more than printet money. Rest of the world is sick of it and just has turned away from West.
Before that there was technology and knowledge differences from what west was able to benefit - but there is such no more. So as we have not anything learned to to as printing money and colonizing other countries - we are left alone.

First steps already made - two biggest world economies has agreed not to us USD for their direct trading as it was before.

Google: China, Japan to Back Direct Trade of Currencies

"Japan and China will promote direct trading of the yen and yuan without using dollars and will encourage the development of a market for companies involved in the exchanges, the Japanese government said. "

That is only beginning!
by newsieee December 31, 2011 10:39 AM EST
How is selling oil abroad anti-free market? Don't get me wrong, I think Free Trade should be done away with and raise tariffs.
See all 5 Replies
by netnuts December 31, 2011 8:23 AM EST
GO RON PAUL 2012!

I was a warmonger,voted straight Republican party ticket for 30 yrs! Eyes opened Now!!!!
All the other's want to be KING!!!! Ron wants you to be King of your LIFE!;-))

? Got My Vote!!!
Choose one: Fascism (Republican) or Marxism (Democrat). Liberty (Ron Paul).
Reply to this comment
by CommonsenseTexan December 31, 2011 10:52 AM EST
Isolationism isn't the answer either...remember you all picked Owebama! Don't do it again! Look up Ron Paul...he is no better than Owebama! You gave us Owebama...don't forget to learn from your mistakes!
See all 217 Comments
.

Follow Political Hotsheet

Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook