Santorum discusses shrinking federal court

Republican presidential candidate former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum walks among empty recliners during a campaign stop at USA Furniture and Bedding, Wednesday, Dec. 28, 2011, in Dubuque, Iowa. / AP Photo/Charlie Neibergall
Republican presidential candidate former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum walks among empty recliners during a campaign stop at USA Furniture and Bedding, Dec. 28, 2011, in Dubuque, Iowa.
/ AP Photo/Charlie NeibergallCEDAR RAPIDS, Iowa - One of Iowa's newest top-tier candidates, Rick Santorum, on Wednesday took on an issue that previous Hawkeye State front-runner Newt Gingrich has often discussed - reining in so-called "activist" federal judges.
Santorum said he has had "a lot of interesting discussions" with friends in the legal world about whether entire courts could be eliminated -- a controversial idea that Gingrich has tossed out in recent speeches. Instead, the former Pennsylvania senator suggested he is more open to considering narrowing the jurisdiction of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.
The Ninth Circuit, based in San Francisco and covering nine Western states, has long been a target for conservatives who accuse it of liberal bias.
"What might be possible to do is to take the Ninth Circuit and shrink it and put all the ninth circuit judges in California and maybe Hawaii for good measure ... I think that could be done and I believe that would send a very strong signal, and that is, follow the Constitution and if you don't follow the Constitution, we're not going to make life easy for you," Santorum said.
Santorum also continued his criticism of Rep. Ron Paul, who along with Mitt Romney is ahead of Santorum in Iowa in a recent CNN poll. He said the Texas Republican "would run to the left of President Obama on national security. He's on the Dennis Kucinich wing" - a reference to the liberal anti-war Ohio Democrat.
Popular in Politics
- Obama forgets to salute while boarding Marine One Play Video
- The Ted Cruz conundrum
- Petraeus biographer regrets affair
- Senators lack votes on immigration despite progress
- Senator: Oklahoma "hit hard, but we're not knocked out"
- IRS' Lerner was asked to resign, refused: GOP Sen. 204 Comments
- As summer approaches, sequestration threatens holiday fun
- GOP Rep.: Obama elected because of Reagan's immigration reforms














Common Law !!
Please read about statutorial encroachment by state and federal governments on ALL of our rights...those powers not herein delegated to the government are reserved to the states or to the people.
Someone left the light on and the S.O.B.s keep writing laws to deprive you of rights you already have.
Were it not for competing interests between federal and state government...the state would basically keep you in bondage to the landed and banking interests; i.e. President Andrew Jackson.
UNFORTUNATELY, there are no new lands to steal from the Indians for the economy to keep running....so we have a war economy that will not stop. Time to heed the Advice of former President Dwight D. Eisenhauer (REPUBLICAN) regarding the Military-Industrial Complex threat to our society and our democracy...the COLD WAR is over, but the spending spree just continues.
Wow, these loons are totally in outer space.......
Laws are not a popularity contest dummy.. they have to pass muster as to legality of the law.
YAAAWN. Santorum, unelectable - again.