Political Hotsheet
By

Lucy Madison /

CBS News/ December 20, 2011, 1:17 PM

House rejects payroll tax cut compromise

Updated: 3:19 p.m. ET

The House on Tuesday voted to disapprove a Senate bill that would have extended the payroll tax cut and unemployment insurance for two months, seeking instead a conference with the Senate to work out differences between the two chambers' bills.

The motion, which dictates that Congress go to conference with the Senate on the payroll tax package and disagrees with the Senate bill, was approved in a 229-193 vote falling largely along party lines: Seven Republicans voted against it, as did all Democrats.

By declining to vote on the actual Senate-passed legislation, House Republicans avoid voting "no" on the popular measure - theoretically making it harder for Democrats to target them for opposing a payroll tax cut bill. Because House Republicans passed their own bill addressing the payroll tax cut, they were then able to vote for a conference on the House bill and the Senate bill while avoiding a vote on the Senate bill altogether.

In a surprise announcement in the White House briefing room following on Tuesday afternoon, President Obama blasted a "faction of Republicans in the House" for "refusing to even vote on the Senate bill."

"Even though Republicans and Democrats in the Senate were willing to compromise for the good of the country, a faction of Republicans in the House are refusing to even vote on the Senate bill -- a bill that cuts taxes for 160 million Americans," he said. "And because of their refusal to cooperate, all those Americans could face a tax hike in just 11 days, and millions of Americans who are out there looking for work could find their unemployment insurance expired."

House Republicans argue that the Senate bill - which was negotiated by leaders Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., and Harry Reid, D-Nev., and which sailed through the chamber with broad bipartisan support - is a short-term fix for a long-term problem.

"As we approach the Christmas holidays and the prospects of a new year, what we're saying is, we want to provide families with some certainty," said Rep. Eric Cantor, R-Va., in an interview with MSNBC shortly following the vote. "I think everybody in the town agrees that 60-day extension on tax policy is not the way to legislate. Everyone from the president to the Democratic leaders in the Senate as well as we in the House believe that's what we ought to be doing, and that's the position that we've taken on behalf of the hard-working taxpayers of this country."

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid has indicated that he will not bring the Senate back to conference on the bill, warning in a statement yesterday that House Republicans would be held responsible -- at least by Democrats -- if Americans saw their taxes go up on January 1st.

In a statement following the vote, Reid said it was "unconscionable" for Republicans to block the legislation.

"It is unconscionable that Speaker Boehner is blocking a bipartisan compromise that would protect middle-class families from the tax hike looming on January 1st -- a compromise that Senator McConnell and I negotiated at Speaker Boehner's own request," Reid said. "I have been trying to negotiate a yearlong extension with Republicans for weeks, and I am happy to continue doing so as soon as the House of Representatives passes the bipartisan compromise to protect middle-class families, but not before then."

A spokesman for Reid suggested that the Democratic leader would stand by his decision not to call back the Senate. And on Monday night, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi said she would not appoint any House Democrats to participate in the conference.

In light of Democrats' apparent adamance against going to conference on the bill, House Speaker John Boehner on Tuesday urged President Obama to "call on Senate Democrats" to return to Congress and "sit down and resolve this bill as quickly as possible" in conference.

"I need the president to help out!" he exclaimed, to Republican applause, in remarks to reporters.

"We have done our job. All we need now is to resolve our differences," Boehner said. "A two-month extension is nothing more than kicking the can down the road. The president has asked us to do this for a full year; we did it for a full year. We offset the costs with reasonable offsets. There's no reason we can't do this."

Boehner also suggested that, contrary to reports, he never indicated to Senate leadership that he would support the bill they came up with. 

"When they were getting ready to pass this [bill]... I made it clear to them at that point that I was uncomfortable with where they were going -- and I expressed my displeasure," he said, referring to negotiations between Reid and McConnell over language for the legislation they thought both parties could support.

Mr. Obama, however, made no indications that he would "help out" the speaker, noting instead that it is not too late for the House to bring the Senate bill up for a vote, and calling on them to do so.

Mr. Obama argued that House Republicans, despite advocating for the passage of a payroll tax cut extension, are attempting to "wring concessions from Democrats on issues that have nothing to do with the payroll tax cuts -- issues where the parties fundamentally disagree."

"We have more important things to worry about than politics right now. We have more important things to worry about than saving face or figuring out internal caucus politics," he continued. "The clock is ticking. Time is running out. If the House Republicans refuse to vote for the Senate bill or even allow it to come up for a vote, taxes will go up in 11 days."

Whether or not any or all House lawmakers will be allowed to leave town for the holidays remains unclear - but Democratic Sen. Chuck Schumer on Tuesday suggested that Democrats will hold their ground on the matter and hope that Republicans cave to increasing pressure.

"Pressure every day is mounting on Republicans," Schumer said in an appearance on MSNBC. "All you have to do is let the pressure mount, day in and day out, and they will come back and support the two month. Not a majority of Republicans, but enough Republicans added to the Democrats to pass the bill by a large majority. In a few days, they will fold."

In the meantime, Democrats continue to lay blame at the feet of House Republicans for blocking legislation they argue has broad bipartisan support, while Republican lawmakers contend Democrats are seeking a band-aid solution that fails to adequately address the problem at hand.

"Don't blame Congress for not working together," said Rep. Jan Schakowsky, D-Ill., in comments on the House floor Tuesday, before blasting Republicans for their "sanctimonious rhetoric." "Blame the House Republicans - who can't even work with each other."

Rep. Steve Scalise, R-La., on the other hand, argued on the floor that voters are "sick and tired of this absurd action from Congress" - and that they want long-term solutions rather than a "two-month patch that doesn't even fix the problem."

"Pelosi said she will not appoint any House Democrats to participate in [conference] negotiations," he continued. "In the spirit of Christmas, you've got the minority leader saying she'll just take her toys and go home."

Cantor's office announced Tuesday that House members will get 24 hours' notice before the next vote. Consequently, most members are expected to go home after subsequent votes this afternoon.

© 2011 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
188 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
cbsandme says:
Is my Republican leaders are so badly out of touch with the American people? You Rep are going to be out of your jobs come 2012, I am Rep but not voting Rep anymore this 2012!!! I am MAD!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
occupy_cbs says:
travisbbrown: "Any guesses as to how many House Bills that are known job creators are Tabled in Senate right now?"




ZERO! Absolutely ZERO!

Just because you fox/rush parrots keep spewing the same political rhetoric about "jobs bills" doesn't make it true or factual, since they are noting but more of the same failed "supply-side" economic lunacy that the republicans have been pushing for 30 years now!

Sorry pal, but there hasn't been one "job's bill" passed by the highly-partisan GOP House at all, and the only one that had a chance of creating jobs -- bipartisan legislation in H.R. 1663, The Small Business Encouragement Act -- was buried in committee to die back in April!

You far-right partisan hacks calling yourselves 'libertarians,' are no different than any other far-right extremist - teabagger or not!
reply
travisbbrown replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Thanks for making my point about liberals being intolerant. Why do you have to resort to name calling? Ill answer it for you. You lack the intellectual ability to argue on the merits. I will also help you with the nomber of jobs bills that are tabled in the Senate. I did some research and I miscounted. It is way more than seven. HR"s 3630, 1633,10, 3010, 527, 3012,3094, 2930, 2940, 1965, 1070, 1904, 2273, 2681, 2250, 2401, 2587, 1938, 1315, 2018, 2021, 1231, 1229, 1230, 34, 910, 37, and 872. Most of these bills have bipartisan support but are tabled in the senate. FOr politicial reasons? You decide. By my math that is alot more than zero. I think the problem is that you will not recongnize a jobs bill unless it actually has the govt creating jobs. What you must understand is the Govt has no money to create a job with therefore it must take it from someone. Even if you avoid the obvious economic growth that has happended as a result of supply side economics, justify this to me. Should the govt take money by force from some in the form of taxes and redistribute it to others for philanthropic or political purposes? Should it give the money to certain businesses to help them compete? Before you answer think about this if you and I were crossing the street and we saw a person in great need of financial help, I know that you carry alot of cash on you so I rob you at gunpoint only to give the money to the man in need. Is that a moral thing to do? I was acting out of compassion. I know that you will get more $$$$ cause you always have. This is obviously theft on my part. Well then why is it any different when our Govt does it? There is no moral difference only we as a society accept it cause that is the way that it has always been.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
occupy_cbs says:
BlameRepublicanz: "HAHAHAHAHA uh ohhhh looks like Republicans took this whole obstruction game they were playing with our legislative process a lil' too far...now Boehner is stuck trying to explain why he would rather have no payroll tax cut for the middle class instead of a two month deal so they can have time to work on a larger proposal...it makes no sense."

"R.I.P. tea party....you were never a movement to begin with...just the same old, fat, white Republican voters of the last 40 years."



Yes, speaker boner has been backed into the corner by his own far-right teabagging extremists -- nothing more than a rebranding of the same, old religious right, pushing more social conservative wedge issues like they have continuously for the past 30 years!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
travisbbrown says:
I used to be a liberal (aka uninformed) then I woke up. I must say that liberals are still the most intolerant and hateful of all political groups. You are not liberal in the original meaning of the word. Most of you are Fascist in one sense or another. True freedom frightens you because true freedom would mean responsibility as well. It looks like alot of my former brethren are on this website and still haven't learned there lessons. Well allow me to enlighten some of you. Some of you say the GOP is playing politics here by not voting on the Senate bill. Might I remind all of you that the Senate has not passed a Budget in 3 years and some change. Any guesses as to how many House Bills that are known job creators are Tabled in Senate right now? By my count it is up to seven. I guess its morale to not vote on the House's bill if the Senate is Democratically ran. My guess is if the situation were reversed so would your comments be. For those of you that say the rich dont pay their fair share please check out the facts at http://ntu.org/tax-basics/who-pays-income-taxes.html. For those of you that say if only we didn't have the wars/bush tax cuts/oil subisidies then all our problems would be solved I would suggest http://schweikert.house.gov/ByTheNumbers/. Many of you are against tax breaks for Oil companies however you are fine with subsidies to Green Companies. Why the contradiction? The answer is because you have no principles. While I agree that we shouldn't have the wars and all companies should compete in the free market(free of subsidies), I am constant on my principles while you are not.
For those of you accusing me of being a GOP hack I will correct you I am a Libertarian. Which means the following. I am for maximum liberty/responsibility, I believe that my rights stop where the next person's begins, I have no right to the property of others and they have no right to mine. You are the enemies of Freedom.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
BlameRepublicanz says:
HAHAHAHAHA uh ohhhh looks like Republicans took this whole obstruction game they were playing with our legislative process a lil' too far...now Boehner is stuck trying to explain why he would rather have no payroll tax cut for the middle class instead of a two month deal so they can have time to work on a larger proposal...it makes no sense...we all know why this happens...and they just handed Obama his re election...thanks guys!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
BlameRepublicanz says:
R.I.P. tea party....you were never a movement to begin with...just the same old, fat, white Republican voters of the last 40 years.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
BlameRepublicanz says:
wait, people actually think DEMOCRATS are the one playing politics with this payroll tax cut? How? Who is right, the tea party congresspeople or the 39 Republican senators who voted for it? Why did Republicans throw in a PIPELINE if they wanted a one year deal???? What does a pipeline have to do with this?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
wizardlady says:
So what is the REAL piece of BS that the Republicans want to put in this payroll tax cut bill by sending it to a committee prior to voting on it? A two month solution....why not just make it for a year without any further negotiations if it is a good bill? No, No, the Republicans want to 'make a political power play' to force the President to "show signs of weak leadership"....all the way down to November.

Frankly, I think a tax hike would definitely benefit the democrats as the FAILURE OF THE REPUBLICANS to vote for the extension will backfire on them at the poles....in January through November. They are showing their true colors more and more.....a party for the ELITE and RICH....bent on destroying American traditions.
reply
packeryman replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
There is only one way to solve this problem, vote out all the tea bagging lunatics in 2012, better yet vote out all self righteous bible thumping religious fanatics, this means there are very few moderates left in the party, this leaves the Dem's and Independents only one choice,vote out all Republicans in 2012. We cannot let happen in 2012 as did in 2010 voters stayed home. Now we see the results in Ohio, Wisconsin, and the House. These guys have a plan to destroy the middle class. All we need to do to defeat them is show up at the polls en mass.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
stupa5 says:
The corporate lap dogs GOP congress & Tea baggers..make "Scrooge" look like Mother Teresa"
That a boy Boehner...what's your next move/ to get the job creators to hire 7 year olds as janitors to work at Walmart greeters or MacDonalds for a Happy meal & toy!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
stupa5 says:
GOP motto: "let the average American sink to the bottom! While keep the rich getting richer"
reply
See all 188 Comments
Scroll Left Scroll Right