Mitt Romney: Gingrich a "very wealthy" man
Updated 5:38 p.m. Eastern Time
Republican presidential contender Mitt Romney doesn't want to be cast as the only rich person in the race for the Republican presidential nomination.
In the wake of his attempt to make a $10,000 bet with Rick Perry during Saturday's Republican presidential debate - a move that put a spotlight on Romney's $190 million-plus net worth and prompted critics to cast him as out of touch - the former Massachusetts governor told CBS News on Wednesday that his chief rival for the nomination is a "very wealthy man."
"Newt Gingrich has wealth from having worked in government," Romney told CBS News political correspondent Jan Crawford in an interview in New York. "He's a wealthy man, a very wealthy man. If you have a half a million dollar purchase from Tiffany's, you're not a middle class American."
Romney's comment both spotlighted Gingrich's wealth - his campaign earlier this year estimated his net worth at at least $6.7 million - and drew attention to how Gingrich earned the money. The former House speaker made millions as an adviser and influence broker in Washington after leaving Congress, including at least $1.6 million from government-backed mortgage giant Freddie Mac. (Romney has called on Gingrich to return that money.) The former Massachusetts governor also made reference to Gingrich and his wife's onetime $250,000-plus line of credit at Tiffany & Co.
Romney was in New York for fundraisers Wednesday, prompting the Democratic National Committee to hire an airplane to fly over the Hudson river with a banner reading, "Bet you 10k Romney's Out of Touch."
More from the interview will be released on the "CBS Evening News" and CBSNews.com later today.
In a seperate interview with the New York Times Wednesday, Romney took a different shot at Gingrich, saying "Zany is not what we need in a president."
"Zany is great in a campaign. It's great on talk radio. It's great in print, it makes for fun reading," he said. "But in terms of a president, we need a leader, and a leader needs to be someone who can bring Americans together."
Gingrich responded by sticking to his (questionable) claim that he is running a positive campaign and telling reporters, "I'll let him decide what zany is."
"They should run their campaign the way they want to; I'm going to run my campaign the way I want to," he said.
Romney, Gingrich battle could drag for months
Paul on Gingrich ads: "Pointing out people's positions is not negative"
Obama's re-election campaign won't be pretty
Full CBS News coverage: Mitt RomneyMitt Romney on the trail
Popular in Politics
- Michelle Obama decries "slander" that educated blacks are "trying to act white" Play Video
- Adviser on White House scandals: "Partisan fishing expeditions" won't distract Obama 170 Comments
- Romney condemns "breach of trust" in Washington
- Benghazi-disciplined diplomat a prolific poet
- Obama: Racism is no excuse for not excelling Play Video
- Republicans continue beating Benghazi drum 108 Comments
- Officials on Benghazi: "We made mistakes, but without malice" 363 Comments
- Obama to discuss legality of drone program














Really
Wealth does buy the option . "Are you ready for it".?
To not give a ................................s...........hhhhh..................t
You do realize that Fox showed everyone how hyper-partisan can make you money and now everyone does it, don't you? If you hate CBS and the liberal media you really have FoxNews to blame. We used to have REAL news before they came along. At least some of the time.
Every story has to be about a bad Democrat or you are not happy?
In this case I think he is right to point out that Newt is a wealthy person AND that he 'earned' all of that money at the direct expense of taxpayers. It is one thing to be wealthy because you are corporate raider sleazebag and a different thing to be a life-long politician who can afford to blow $500,000 on jewelry. Most Americans will never be able to afford to blow that kind of money on anything - most of us have to work crappy jobs for 20 or 30 years to pay off a house 'worth' that much.
Romney is saying - 'we are both of the 1%', but he is implying that he earned his (much greater) wealth honestly.
Really he is just trying to deflect some of the anger about his idiot 'I'll bet you $10,000' moment - which sounded like something that you say on the playground when you are 6 years old.
How much of a tool is Romney? A gigantic one, based on that statement.
Seriously, the whole pack of Republicans are a showcase - or sideshow - of what's wrong with the right-wing politicians today. A bunch of elitist, privileged, rich and amazingly STUPID people each a kettle calling the other kettles black.
Are their supporters really so abysmally incapable of any inkling of reason that they see a distinction between any of them? Or are their brains so decayed by feeding at the teat of ignorance called Fox News that they can't figure out they're being lied to so blatantly?
It's amazing that the right-wing is even the threat to the future of the human species that it is. The Bible says the meek shall inherit the earth. But it seems the retarded will destroy it first.