Political Hotsheet
By

Lucy Madison /

CBS News/ December 12, 2011, 4:39 PM

Sebelius: Decision to keep Plan B age restrictions not political

Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius.

/ AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster
Health and Human Services secretary Kathleen Sebelius on Monday defended her decision not to remove age restrictions on Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. (TEVA)'s Plan B One-Step contraceptive, denying the decision was political.

Sebelius, who last week overruled the Food and Drug Administration's recommendation to make the contraceptive pill available over-the-counter to girls 16 and under, told reporters in Queens Monday that the company could re-apply to remove the age restrictions.

"There are always opportunities for the company to come back with additional data," Sebelius said, according to Bloomberg News.

"Subsequent discussions can take place," she added.

Some are suggesting the move was made for political reasons, and at least one former FDA official is calling on President Obama to reverse the decision.

On Monday, however, Sebelius told reporters her decision was not "about politics."

"It isn't about politics," Sebelius said. "I did not feel that the science supported "I did not feel that the science supported [making the contraceptive readily available to] all ages, because there was a large missing piece of the puzzle," she said, according to the New York Daily News.

"I felt that the data presented, and justification for [making Plan B available to] all ages, did not match," she added.

In explaining her decision to overrule the FDA last week, Sebelius cited "significant cognitive and behavioral differences between older adolescent girls and the youngest girls of reproductive age" that needed to be taken into consideration.

The Obama administration has since taken heat for the decision, both from women's health advocates and some Democrats.

Speaking at the same event earlier, New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg said he disagreed with the Obama administration's call - because while "it would be much better if the young girls didn't get pregnant" in the first place, "once that happens I think that this should be available to anybody."

"The bottom line is, we have many too many out-of-wedlock births in this country," he continued. "And, yes, the people who say young girls shouldn't get pregnant, they're 100 percent right. And we do in this city a lot to try to teach people and inform them of the consequences of being parents and how -- the responsibilities.

Still, Bloomberg said he didn't know if Sebelius's decision was grounded in political interests.

"Why Sebelius decided to overrule her, I don't know," he said.

© 2011 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
2 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
dlaldhkTtmq says:
http://youtu.be/zXKV78VERio
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
ghostsouls says:
This is all about money, make no mistake. Big Pharma wants to usurp the rights of parents over the health of their female children all for a buck, and all the while using women's rights as a disguise. They don't get it, Women's rights are NOT children's rights. There are age restrictions on movies for Gods sake! Every year that passes in this country, more and more things come out that give the green light for children to have sex. What happens if a child takes this and is on medicines for epilepsy? There are warnings abut taking these two drugs together... What if it's a 12 or 13 year old, kinda heavy set, and she doesn't realize she is pregnant and takes it over and over again when she is 3 or more months pregnant, because they don't understand how the medicine works, will there be a deformed baby? What if guys think they can slip this in a girl's drink, to ensure she doesn't get pregnant after he has sex with her, and she ends up getting a reaction and doesn't even know why? CHILDREN are not responsible enough to administer medicine to themselves , why do children get in trouble for having Tylenol or Midol in school? What happens when girls start passing this drug all over their schools? There are too many unknowns, not to mention the rights parents have in the medical decisions of their minor children. How can a parent make an informed decision whether or not to give a child medicine if they are sick, if they don't know they have taken THIS medicine first?
reply
Scroll Left Scroll Right