Political Hotsheet
By

Brian Montopoli /

CBS News/ December 5, 2011, 2:53 PM

Obama pushes GOP on payroll tax hike

President Obama took to White House briefing room Monday to press Republicans to agree to extend the Social Security payroll tax cut holiday, which is set to expire at the end of the year if no action is taken.

"It would spur spending, it would spur hiring, and it's the right things to do," he said.

Many congressional Republicans have signaled they are open to extending the tax cut - though they have balked at Democratic proposals to pay for it. Last week, Senate Democrats failed to get the 60 votes necessary to pass a bill that would have extended and expanded the cut and paid for it with a 3.25 percent tax on income in excess of $1 million.

Democrats see the payroll tax fight as a prime opportunity to cast themselves as fighting for the middle class while casting Republicans as doing the bidding of the wealthiest Americans. The Obama reelection team emailed supporters last week to argue the fight shows that "when [Republicans] say no tax hikes, they really mean millionaires and billionaires shouldn't pay more, ever -- even if that means your taxes go up."

Mr. Obama picked up that line of argument Monday.

"I know many Republicans have sworn an oath never to raise taxes as long as they live," he said. "How could it be the only time there's a catch is when it comes to raising taxes for middle class families?"

Immediately after the speech, White House spokesman Jay Carney revealed a new countdown clock just behind the White House podium.

"If Congress doesn't act, middle class taxes increase in: 26 days, 09 hours, 35 minutes," it said.

Democrats warn that if the payroll tax is not extended, a family making $50,000 per year would see a tax hike of $1,000. They say extending and expanding the cut would put an average of $1,500 into the pockets of 160 million Americans.

"There aren't many folks either in the middle class or those trying to get in the middle class who can afford to give up $1,000 - not right now," Mr. Obama said Monday. "That's why Congress must act."

Republicans have accused Democrats of playing politics with the issue and of pushing a bill that would pay for the tax cut in a way that would have a negative impact on job creation.

"In all likelihood, we will agree to continue the current payroll tax relief for another year, but we believe that it should be paid for," Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell said last week.

Mr. Obama said Monday he was willing to work with Republicans to pay for an extension of the payroll tax holiday, though he also noted that Republicans have previously not worried about paying for tax cuts, including in the case of the Bush tax cuts for high earners. He said the extension could not be paid for through cuts in areas like education and innovation, saying he is not willing to "pay for the extension in a way that actually hurts the economy."

The bill put forth by Democrats last week would have cut the Social Security portion of the payroll tax for employees from 4.2 to 3.1 percent and cut employer payroll taxes from 6.2 percent to 3.1 percent. (The current payroll tax holiday lowered the employee payroll tax cut from 6.2 percent to 4.2 percent.) A separate bill from Senate Republicans would have extended the current 4.2 percent payroll tax level, paying for it mostly through cuts to the federal workforce and an extended pay freeze for federal workers. Neither bill included the portion of the payroll tax that goes to Medicare, which stands at 1.45 percent from both the employee and employer.

Both bills failed, with the failure of the GOP version of the bill showing that Republicans are not unified on the issue of whether to extend the tax cut.

Senate Democrats plan to push a new bill this week that would drop the employer expansion of the tax cut but keep the expanded employee-side tax cut at 3.1 percent, a Democratic aide tells CBS News. The proposal reduces the cost of the bill from $265 billion to about $180 billion. House Republicans are expected to release a proposal this week as well.

Mr. Obama also pressed lawmakers to extend unemployment insurance before going home for the holidays, calling it the "last line of defense between hardship and catastrophe."

"We are going through what is still an extraordinary time in this country and this economy," said Mr. Obama, who went on to say that the money unemployed Americans get from such insurance allows them to put gas in the tank so they can get their children to school. "We cannot play games with unemployment insurance when we still have an unemployment rate that is far too high."

He said that independent economists believe that both extending the payroll tax holiday and extending unemployment insurance would help the economy, and warned they would lower their growth forecast for the nation if Congress does not act.

"Keep your word to the American people, and don't raise taxes on them right now," Mr. Obama said. "Now's not the time to slam on the brakes, now's the time to step on the gas."

© 2011 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
37 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Zann-Zel says:
LOL! Poor Ranger! On the Internet you can't see anyone - I guess your personality just happens to be attracted to to male personalities! Except for me of course! : ) Don't feel bad I seem to spend more time talking to Republicans, REPUBLICANS!? : ( I wouldn't touch them with a ten foot pole in real life!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Progress4USA says:
by levelheadedtoo December 5, 2011 7:33 PM EST
Hey Ranger

What park did you work in? I like Yellowstone. Nice landscapeing. For someone that worked with the public, you would know first hand about protecting the rights of the poor. How many rich people came to your park to see their tax dollars at work? Sometimes we forget to take time to salute our park rangers.
----

See Ranger...I'm not the only one who thinks you work for the National Park system.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
levelheadedtoo says:
In a few weeks the GOP lead congress will allow the following tax incentives expire.
1. Energy Effecient home upgrades. You will no longer get to deduct a portion of upgrades to cut energy cost.
2. College expenses. If you have kids in college you can no longer take a portion of the cost off you taxes
3. Adoption Help. On Jan 1 people can no longer claim assistance to addopt an unwanted child.
4. sales tax. You can no longer deduct state sales taxes
5. mortgage Insurance premimums. No matter how bad the market is now it just got worse for some people
6. Teacher Classroom materials. Your kids teacher could deduct the out of pocket cost of materials she spent on her class. Not any more. Jonny will no longer get those cut outs of Ron Reagen for the fridge. That should shut those liberal teachers up. The government should save a few thousand here.

Your local GOP office will explain if you call.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
RobAla says:
I thought Democrats were about funding Social Security. Why is taking payments to Social Security out of paychecks a good thing? Social Security is in danger of going bankrupt, as it is.

So, President Obama's plan to create jobs is to cripple the Social Security system even more for those who will need most to depend on it? He thinks this will help put money into the economy, while he wants to tax businesses and higher income brackets more which will take more money out of the economy??????

This makes absolutely no sense. He has the weirdest economic ideas I have ever heard off. Still, he acts like he is a genius in economics and tries to lecture everyone else on the subject. Wow!
reply
Progress4USA replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
SS is solvent to 2035. The middle class is on the ropes NOW...do the math sport!
linkicon reporticon emailicon
noloyalisti says:
I really would have to agree with YourRearViewMirror. I mean the actions speak for themselves. Here you have a bunch of evil rich Republicons who don't give a rat's butt about America or its workers and another bunch of spineless Top 1% Democrats deciding how to best split up the wealth created by us.
reply
Progress4USA replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Why does the GOP hate 99% of American people?????
Zann-Zel replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
LOL! Poor Ranger! On the Internet you can't see anyone - I guess your personality just happens to be attracted to to male personalities! Except for me of course! : ) Don't feel bad I seem to spend more time talking to Republicans, REPUBLICANS!? : ( I wouldn't touch them with a ten foot pole in real life!
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Progress4USA says:
How's the new dog doing Ranger?
reply
Progress4USA replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Lord, I've got one overly affectionate kitten on my hands. Pearl (her name) likes to get under my neck and have at it.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Progress4USA says:
by RetRangerCSM December 5, 2011 5:45 PM EST
"Meboard" I thought you were riding "Toys for Tots" with me Sunday?

You missed a Good one -- Best Yet!
----

Nope Ranger...after that Penn State locker room thing, I'm staying clear of anyone under 18. (Actually, that's not hard for me since I can't relate to kids these days...) And where the hell is my free roof!!!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Progress4USA says:
Why does the GOP want to increase taxes on 99% of America during a recovery!?!!?!?!?!?! Seems to violate everything they stand for...hmmmm? How hypocritical can they get??? (Answer: A LOT MORE!!!!!)
reply
Progress4USA replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Ron Paul who?????
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Progress4USA says:
by miamivic2 December 5, 2011 4:59 PM EST
He waited too late to do it.

Carefully crafted timing & all for it to fail.
-----

He's working as fast as he can, but there's STILL a hell of a mess to clean up from 8 long years of repub blundering.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
luadda22 says:
by GOPeconomicterror December 5, 2011 4:27 PM EST
Yep, the nations largest employer, Wal-Mart, has the highest percentage of the working poor

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Lets see, a pharmacist at Wal-Mart makes around $116,000 a year, requires about 7 years of education.

A full-time sales associate at Wal-Mart starts around $8.80 per hour, required to be breathing, does not even has to have a GED.

Do you think that maybe it's an education problem rather than a labor problem?

Maybe if they had kept their knees together and finished school they wouldn't be having a problem feeding their rug-rats?
reply
democracy8 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
"does not even HAS to have a GED."--Gee, luadda, where'd you get YOURS? There are a lot of educated people (business retirees, etc.) who work as sales associates at WalMart. Just because the job doesn't require much doesn't mean that people in those positions aren't necessarily overqualified. As to those who can't their knees together and finish school, look around your own trailer park.
See all 37 Comments