Gingrich willing to "take heat" for immigration stance
Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich on Tuesday said the United States should not break up families of immigrants who entered the United States illegally and he was willing to "take the heat" from Republicans for deviating from his party's orthodoxy.
"I don't see how the party that says it's the party of the family is going to adopt an immigration policy which destroys families that have been here a quarter century," Gingrich said at the CNN debate on foreign policy in Washington, near the White House.
"And I'm prepared to take the heat for saying, let's be humane in enforcing the law without giving them citizenship but by finding a way to create legality so that they are not separated from their families," Gingrich said.
The former House speaker said recent immigrants should be sent home if they are found out, but "if you've been here 25 years and you got three kids and two grandkids, you've been paying taxes and obeying the law, you belong to a local church, I don't think we're going to separate you from your family, uproot you forcefully and kick you out."
Gingrich has been rising in the polls in recent weeks and those remarks are likely to draw more attention to his candidacy as he now sits at the front of the field with former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney. And they may not sit well with Republican primary voters who tend to be more conservative than the party as a whole.
Huntsman calls for Afghan troop withdrawal
Gingrich willing to "take heat" for immigration stance
Republican debate: Winners and Losers
Rick Perry: Panetta should resign in protest over supercommittee cuts
Bachmann: Perry "naive" on Pakistan policy
Minnesota Rep. Michele Bachmann was quick to label Gingrich's position an "amnesty" program, though Gingrich himself did not use that word.
"I don't agree that you would make 11 million workers legal, because that, in effect, is amnesty," Bachmann said.
When Gingrich responded to Bachmann by saying he "specifically did not say we'd make the 11 million people legal," she turned it back on him.
"If I understood correctly, I think the speaker just said that that would make 11 people -- 11 million people who are here illegally now legal," she said.
The Gingrich remarks brought to mind comments from Texas Gov. Rick Perry in September, when he said his fellow White House hopefuls are heartless for criticizing his support of providing government funds to help lower tuition rates for university students in his state who did not enter the United States legally.
Perry immediately backpedaled from his comments after facing sharp criticism for being "soft" on immigration. Perry had started to decline from his front-runner status before those comments, but his slide hastened after he made the remarks.
Gingrich has surpassed Romney in a number of national polls in recent days, in large part because of his strong debate performances. A poll released Tuesday from Quinnipiac University put Gingrich at 26 percent, atop the field. And he beat Romney 49 percent to 39 percent in a hypothetical head-to-head contest.
Gingrich is the latest Republican to challenge Romney's frontrunner status, but a CNN poll indicates there is still plenty of room for movement in the race: Only 27 percent of Republicans said they have definitely made up their minds.
Ron Paul: Israel can take care of itself
Rick Santorum endorses Muslim profiling
Popular in Politics
- Obama forgets to salute while boarding Marine One Play Video
- The Ted Cruz conundrum
- Senators lack votes on immigration despite progress
- Petraeus biographer regrets affair
- Senator: Oklahoma "hit hard, but we're not knocked out"
- IRS' Lerner was asked to resign, refused: GOP Sen. 205 Comments
- GOP Rep.: Obama elected because of Reagan's immigration reforms
- As summer approaches, sequestration threatens holiday fun













And almost slid down the campaign hill
But with each debate his words seem to match his white hair
As slowly with thought he expounds the ideas he wants to share
Our borders are not secure, porous as a sieve
People always crossing to find a better place to live
Children born here even if parents illegally crossed
Should not over a fence when parents caught be tossed
We are not ready to rfd the parents who by stealth or on the run
Or hiked the deserts under the broiling sun
Then wait until their American born children turn 18
To deport the partents from the American scene.
We can spend until the cows come home but we will never secure
For ever dollar spent here is maybe a better cure
Two spent to the children assimilate and melt into the pot
To become the Americans we have always, always sought.
to run for POTUS. I am a right leaning independent but I am so sick
of these political dope addicts like Gingrich, Dick Morris, Pelosi and others of both parties. And Barry is doing a bang up job of dividing this country with his class warefare divide and
conquer re-election efforts. If you are not sick of this current
adminstration and the pathetic Republican candidates You are not breathing. Voting for either is like hmmm do I want AIDS or Cancer.
We better come up with some better people to run this show or we are doomed. Gingrich vs Soeterro How bad can it get.
Newt makes sense ...... long-term illegals are relatively few in number. Can't argue with giving a break to those who work to support themselves and shown good citizenship (other than entering the country illegally). However, we've been here before and blew it. We previously granted amnesty but failed to mend the hole in the fence. It's time to fix the problem by making sure we can identify and remove illegal aliens, especially those who are prone to committing crime. Smart immigration policy can do that; a hole in the fence can't.
In Washington State, the Feds coughed up money to help fund our Basic Health program ..... health care assistance for the poor. But the feds demanded the state go through the rolls and throw out anyone who couldn't prove they are legitimately in America. Result #1: thousands were disenrolled. Result #2: thousands re-enrolled after the lawsuit started. We don't have the sense of a Congressman in a house of prostitution.
Newt isn't saying we should give amnesty to illegals - he is saying exactly the opposite. We should recognize that our own economy benefits from the work of illegals, by keeping food prices down, but that it is wrong to pay government benefits to non-citizens. He is suggesting we just have a legal way for the "guest workers" to be here and work, that is specifically NOT a path to citizenship.
Bravo Newt. You're by far the most intelligent and articulate right wing extremist out there.
But neither party is a good answer because they are both majority owned subsidiaries of the lobbyists and corporaitns, and we really need another option - but I don't see one on the horizon.
Obama, at first I really thought he was Jimmy Carter II the worst us president . Obama was able to undo the camp david accords, which was the only thing Carter accomplished. So he's actually worse then Carter.
Unemployment records, Poverty level highest in history, Job creation (how do you count negatives), Inflation highest on record. Foreign policy , he managed to tick off all of our allies . Tough on Crime - Im not sure sending thousands of Guns to drug cartels in Mexico to commit murder counts as being tough on crime.