Political Hotsheet
By

Stephanie Condon /

CBS News/ November 22, 2011, 8:56 PM

Rick Santorum endorses Muslim profiling

Updated at 9 p.m. ET

In a discussion over balancing national security and privacy, Republican presidential candidate Rick Santorum said Tuesday he would endorse profiling, specifically of Muslims and young men, in order to enhance security at airports.

"We should be trying to find the bomber, not the bomb," the former Pennsylvania senator said at the CNN debate, explaining his support for profiling. He cited the use of profiling in Israel as an example of how it would work.

Asked to explain by debate moderator CNN's Wolf Blitzer who would be profiled, Santorum said, "The folks who are most likely to be committing these crimes."

"Obviously, Muslims would be someone you'd look at," he said, adding that "the radical Muslims are the people that are committing these crimes, by and large, as well as younger males.

Businessman Herman Cain added that he also thinks the Transportation Security Administration would benefit from what he called "targeted identification."

Cain said endorsing ethnic profiling would be "over-simplifying it." He said the government should "ask the professionals," referring to intelligence agencies, who should be profiled.

Republican Rep. Ron Paul, known for his libertarian views, gave a pained look during Santorum's response.

"I have a personal belief that you never have to give up liberty for security," Paul said earlier in the debate.

The discussion over privacy versus national security largely focused on the Patriot Act. Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich said he would strengthen the Patriot Act because the president must have the tools at his disposal to stop a nuclear attack within U.S. borders.

"The key distinction for the American people to recognize is the difference between national security requirements and criminal law requirements," he said. "I think it's desperately important that we preserve your right to be innocent until proven guilty, if it's a matter of criminal law. But if you're trying to find somebody who may have a nuclear weapon that they are trying to bring into an American city, I think you want to use every tool that you can possibly use to gather the intelligence."

Paul said that the Patriot Act "undermines our liberty and that terrorism should be treated as a crime. Using all resources in order to prevent such crimes "is like saying that we need a policeman in every house, a camera in every house because we want to prevent child- beating and wife-beating," he said.

"You can prevent crimes by becoming a police state," Paul continued. "So if you advocate the police state, yes, you can have safety and security and you might prevent a crime, but the crime then will be against the American people and against our freedoms."

More from the debate:

Rick Perry: Panetta should resign in protest over supercommittee cuts
Gingrich willing to "take heat" for immigration stance
Bachmann: Perry "naive" on Pakistan policy
Huntsman calls for Afghan troop withdrawal
Ron Paul: Israel can take care of itself
Republicans call for extension of Patriot Act at debate
Fact checking the GOP national security debate
Republican debate: Winners and Losers

© 2011 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
32 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
TruthAboutTheTEAParty says:
How many terrorists have hit us who have not been young, male and muslim?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
PDX97204 says:
During the debates, Santorum referred to Africa as a country; that's right, a COUNTRY. Why is the media silent on this?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
dantom39 says:
Me too I agree Rick.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
stn_sage says:
Well, this may come as a surprise to him, but,
I bet government agents are ALREADY profiling Muslims
and have been for a long time, official policy or not!
His comments show both how unaware he is of what is going on,
and how he would make America into a Germany of 1937-1945!
That's NOT what we NEED, or what needs to be done!
Bye, Rick!
reply
bilrobi1 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
I'm guessing it's not just Muslims.I'm guessing they're keeping their eye on everyone and likely have since the 1960's or earlier.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Fatesrider says:
It's constitutionally wrong, so of course a candidate slumping in the polls suggests doing it to get support from folks who don't know any better in getting his butt elected while simultaneously not having to actually DO anything about it.

I agree that we should be profiling. But that doesn't mean I'd vote for this moron just because he thinks it's a good idea.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
realtimecoffee says:
by flyswatting November 22, 2011 11:54 PM EST
Hi there, RTC! Personally, I wouldn't want to be profiled...
-
I think it's unavoidable Slappy. And it probably won't be government. Hell I can see the paperboy's bag having an agression detecter and a 911 auto dial. Not that there will be any paperboys, so mute point.Hope your having a good one. Umm, unsure if you would consider it and insult, but Happy Thanksgiving my friend.
reply
realtimecoffee replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Ah the grey areas! Where we find out if the Nazis are back.
Excellant news about the holidays btw. If there is a big upside to Religion, it's the parties they throw.
realtimecoffee replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Also, my advice to everyone is just think of the world as that gossipy neighbor and forget about it. If they ever want to profile me for instance they are going to have a fun read!
linkicon reporticon emailicon
nearl451 says:
Sure. On the other hand, I endorse neocon profiling....of course. Cavity search them all.
reply
realtimecoffee replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
It's going to happen to everyone anyway, if not cops then the bakery or the post office. Or some kid with a cool new ap. Might as well get used to it. Our past is no longer private, it's on files scattered here and there, The good news is no one has the time to go through it all. But if you are ever flagged, some clever person can reconstuct your life. Hate it, but don't see a way to put that baby back in the box.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
bajajohn1 says:
We must profile Republican candidates who want to profile. Look at them closely...they are not too tightly wound.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
bajajohn1 says:
We must profile all white people who look like rednecks. Rednecks pose an immediate threat to peace and harmony in the neighborhood, the city, state and nation.
reply
realtimecoffee replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Love the way we have to find enemies, when most of us will be killed by someone we trust.
DTConcorde
realtimecoffee replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
The trouble with nature is, we don't get to take credit for it. One of the unfortunate truths is, people need to copyright. Which when I think if it, agrees with you.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
jfkrepublican says:
good for you rick..people in hollywood must agree ..isn't there a show named the profiler..?? if it works don't fix it.. go rick ,call it like it is..don't be politically correct..be correct.!
reply
See all 32 Comments
Scroll Left Scroll Right