Political Hotsheet
By

Rebecca Kaplan /

CBS News/ November 17, 2011, 7:13 PM

Perry: I wouldn't honor "trigger" spending cuts

AP
JACKSON, MISS. - As president, Rick Perry would not uphold spending cuts required if the congressional supercommittee fails to meet next week's deadline for a plan to reduce federal spending by $1.2 trillion, the Republican presidential candidate said Thursday.

"Not at all," Perry told reporters here when asked whether he would allow the draconian cuts - including $600 billion from the Pentagon -- to take place if he is in the White House in January, 2013. The Texas governor insists that his plan to lower taxes and reduce regulations will make the cuts unnecessary by stimulating the economy.

Perry decried the supercommittee process as an example of the "lack of leadership in Washington" and faulted President Obama for being "AWOL" on a foreign trip instead of working on the budget cuts.

"Instead of being in Hawaii, or Asia, or whether he thinks he is on this particular trip, he ought to be here, working on this budget issue," Perry said of Mr. Obama, who is on a nine-day trip to Asia. "I think abrogating the responsibility of the presidency to a super committee of Congress was bad leadership to begin with."

Perry's other target of the day was House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi. The Texas governor's formal challenge to the California Democrat to debate him Monday over his proposal to transform Congress into a part-time body, with pay and office budgets halved, inspired Pelosi to make a pointed joke at his expense.

"Monday I'm going to be in Portland in the morning, I'm going to be visiting some of our labs in California in the afternoon, that's two.... I can't remember what the third thing is," Pelosi said, in a reference to Perry's nationally televised brain freeze at a debate earlier this month.

Perry responded by doubling down on his attacks on Pelosi. He called on the House Democratic leader to release details of her stock market profits after a "60 Minutes" report suggested Pelosi and her husband may have profited from stock transactions that were affected by her work as a legislator.

"I get it about why Nancy Pelosi doesn't want to debate me in public, because then she's going to have to explain why she profited from this insider trading information in the stock market," Perry said at the media availability in Jackson. "But if she won't explain her activities in a public setting, such as a debate, then I challenge her to turn over all that information to the Securities Exchange Commission or an independent prosecutor to determine whether she used insider information through her position in congress to make money off of her investments."

The Texas governor has sought to capitalize on anti-Washington fervor in recent days. His campaign produced an ad after the "60 Minutes" report saying that members of Congress who engaged in insider trading should be imprisoned, and has made outlawing the practice a key point in his government reform plan.

Perry himself was accused of insider trading in the late 1990s after he made nearly $40,000 on the purchase and subsequent sale of stock in Kinetic Concepts, Inc., a health technology company owned by top Perry donor James Leninger.

Asked about the event at the press conference, Perry said the SEC had investigated the stock sale and found no wrongdoing. His campaign then furnished a letter proving that the investigation was terminated in 1998 and no enforcement action recommended.

The rest of Perry's day in Mississippi was spent in private fundraisers. Henry Barbour, nephew to the state's powerful governor, accompanied Perry at his press conference and disputed reports that Perry's fundraising has slowed dramatically since he raked in $17 million during his first quarter fundraising. Barbour dismissed talk of poor fundraising as "based on rumors."

Barbour said his uncle, Gov. Haley Barbour, is unlikely to make an endorsement in the race for the GOP presidential nomination, and will focus instead on raising money for the eventual nominee.

© 2011 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
9 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
windrider160 says:
The more he opens his mouth, the more Perry proves that he knows absolutely nothing about how the federal government operates under the Constitution. He's constantly claiming he will do things that he has no Constitutional authority to do. What a jerk.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
johndevinejr says:
Perry is so stupid, the longer he stays in the race the better. Unfortunately he is too stupid even for republicans to vote for.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
bashaperl says:
Oh come on now Slick Rick we now know that you memorize answers that someone else has given you. How else can we explain the fact that you used a multi syllabic word like abrogating?

Guess when you become Pres you will finally do what you have accomplished in Texas creating your own personal fiefdom run by cronies, donors, and corporations while the rest of us serfs slave away to pay the taxes so you and Anita can continue living off the government dole like you have done your entire adult life.

VOTE America, cowboy boots in the WH.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
payasyougo says:
"Perry: I wouldn't honor "trigger" spending cuts"

Now that I believe. Perry would definitely promise future spending cuts to get a current spending increase passed and then re-neg on the promise after he got what he wanted. Definitely fits Perry.
reply
saboori replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Perry's Uproot Washington Program....HEY...IS IT ABOUT TIME. No more insider trading for the Pols. Terms limits...I love it.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
ludvig1-2009 says:
What an idiot. The same Laffer curve philosphy that Raygun used that got us in this mess.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
tom_gwynn says:
Dear Mr Perry,

Please read the Constitution; you know, that document you will be sworn to uphold in the unlikely event you ever become President. In it you will find the words "All bills for raising Revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives." Under House precedent, this includes bills "raising revenue and appropriating the same." Yes, the President proposes a budget... but only the House of Representatives turn it into a bill to made into law. This is called "the power of the purse". The President can't spend one dime without the consent and approval of Congress; in saying you wouldn't honor those cuts you are saying that you would deliberately ignore the law of our country, a criminal and impeachable offense.

Now, you say that Obama "ought to be here, working on this budget issue", but actually that's not his job. That's the job of Congress. In particular it is the job of the majority party of the House of Representatives... which just happens to be *your* party. If you want to know why this budget's in a mess, you need to look in a mirror. Strangely enough, Foreign Policy *is* the President's job, and (oh, look!) that's what he's doing over in Asia right now. So stop carping about Obama not doing his job and start canvassing your fellow Republicans to start doing theirs!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
jimbom121 says:
Perhaps Perry should learn the role of the president vs congress.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Progress4USA says:
"I think abrogating the responsibility of the presidency to a super committee of Congress was bad leadership to begin with."
------------
This idiot has no concept of the role of Congress in budget development or the approval process.

Keep talk'n Rick...just keep on talk'n. Let the folks get to know the REAL Rick Perry!!!!
reply