House passes concealed carry gun bill
CBS/AP
The House of Representatives passed a measure Wednesday that would make a permit to carry a concealed firearm from one state valid in any state that allows citizens to carry concealed weapons. The vote was 272 to 154.
The National Rifle Association-backed measure had the backing of the vast majority of Republicans along with a coalition of pro-gun rights Democrats.
A matching bill has not been brought forward in the Democrat-led Senate. But gun rights advocates have previously nearly-successfully attempted to attach a similar measure to unrelated legislation.
Every state except Illinois and the District of Columbia allow residents to carry concealed weapons, the Associated Press reports, but states have varying standards for issuing permits to do so.
Backers of the measure say concealed carry permits should be treated the same as drivers' licenses, and argue that Second Amendment rights should not be constrained by state boundaries.
The legislation would "make it easier for law-abiding permit holders to know that they are simply in compliance with the law when they carry a firearm as they travel," said Rep. Cliff Stearns, R-Fla, a chief co-sponsor of the bill, according to the AP. The bill would not allow Americans to secure permits in another state for use in their home state.
Opponents complain that it would force states to allow people to carry concealed weapons even if those individuals could not meet that state's standards for securing a permit.
House Democratic Whip Steny H. Hoyer said in a statement before the vote that the bill "would cripple the ability of individual states to legislate on firearm safety and related public safety issues as their unique circumstances dictate." Hoyer also criticized the Republicans who control the House for bringing forth a bill that is not related to jobs, while other Democrats said the legislation flew in the face of Republicans' stated belief in states' rights.
The Obama administration, which has been reticent to weigh in on gun rights issues, declined to take a position on the bill despite calls from gun rights opponents for the president to issue a veto threat.
New York Democrat Sen. Charles Schumer, who is pushing for better Justice Department enforcement of a requirement that states share federal background check information, has vowed to block similar legislation in the Senate.
Dennis Henigan, Acting President of the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, said after the vote that the bill "would make it easier for the Jared Loughners of the world to pack heat on our streets and in our communities."
"It's deplorable that they did this so soon after Gabby Giffords shared her remarkable and moving comeback story," he said. "She and all gun violence victims deserve better from Congress."
Popular in Politics
- Obama to view Oklahoma tornado damage Sunday
- IRS' Lerner: "I have not done anything wrong" 669 Comments
- Christie: Keep politics out of Oklahoma disaster relief
- Former Miss America might challenge McConnell
- WH says criticism of its handling of IRS story is "legitimate"
- Anthony Weiner comeback try begins: Running for NYC mayor 121 Comments
- House passes GOP bill to speed Keystone XL pipeline approval
- Officials on Benghazi: "We made mistakes, but without malice"















Guys, make up your damn minds. If states have the right to deny federal civil rights to married couples, then they damn sure have the right to deny the right to carry a concealed weapon.
There will be no sense of fairness and justice regarding gun rights until we give up the stupidity of liberal/conservative and discuss this issue on urban/rural territory. In the outback, there is no reason whatsoever for people not to be as armed as they wish, but not in an urban setting. Bring a gun into the city, and all it's good for is killing people.
Or protecting one's self. (Ever been to East St. Louis IL?)
If any of those 'citizens' were carryin', we'd ALL BE IN TROUBLE!!
not saying by any means that everybody should have a gun because that certainly isnt true, however if you allow people with a LEGITIMATE background check, **** like this wont happen, same deal with the VT massacre. Taking that right away just gives law breakers the ability to do something without consequence and takes law abiding citezens right to carry a firearm and protect themselves and those around them.
just my .02