Karen Kraushaar rethinking joint press conference
Left to right: Karen Kraushaar, Republican presidential candidate Herman Cain, and Sharon Bialek
/ Getty ImagesAttorney Joel Bennett tells CBS News Karen Kraushaar, one of the women who accused Republican presidential contender Herman Cain of sexual harassment in the 1990's, has now decided she will NOT appear publicly unless Cain's two unnamed accusers also agree to come forward with her.
Yesterday, Bennett said Kraushaar decided to have the press conference with Sharon Bialek, and was also hoping to have any other woman there. Bialek came forward on Monday to accuse Cain of "sexually inappropriate" behavior in the 1990s.
But Bennett says Kraushaar has now concluded she would be the focus of all the attention with only Bialek at her side, so she has de
cided to wait and see if the two other women who have alleged harassment will agree to join her.
She has thus far been unable to speak with them, he said.
Here's a written statement:
PRESS RELEASE
For several days, my client, Karen Kraushaar, has been trying to contact the other two women who were subjected to sexual harassment by Herman Cain while he was the CEO of the National Restaurant Association. Despite diligent efforts, she has not heard from these two women.
Ms. Kraushaar has decided not to hold a press conference unless and until the other women come forward and wish to participate. She will have no further comment until that time and she and I will not be granting any interviews to the media before any such press conference. Ms. Kraushaar thanks Gloria Allred and Sharon Bialek for their willingness to appear with her but believes it would be more meaningful to have all four women present and participating.
Cain blasts "character assassination" against him
Cain camp admits false claim about reporter
Gloria Allred: Herman Cain trying to "crush women" who come forward
Karen Kraushaar called Cain a "monster," her former supervisor says
Popular in Politics
- Obama to view Oklahoma tornado damage Sunday
- IRS' Lerner: "I have not done anything wrong" 669 Comments
- Christie: Keep politics out of Oklahoma disaster relief
- Former Miss America might challenge McConnell
- WH says criticism of its handling of IRS story is "legitimate"
- Anthony Weiner comeback try begins: Running for NYC mayor 121 Comments
- Officials on Benghazi: "We made mistakes, but without malice"
- House passes GOP bill to speed Keystone XL pipeline approval















1)She claims that she could not file a complaint against Cain because she no longer worked for the NRA. The allegation she is making is of an ATTACK, and that is a matter for the POLICE, not an employer. Isn't is funny that neither she nor her Doctor boyfriend had enough common sense to realize this and did not bother to file a legal complaint against Cain and have him tried 14 yrs. ago?
2) She went back to the palatial suite which Cain had upgraded for her, after allegedly been attacked by him, and stayed in it, proving that she was neither upset nor afraid, otherwise, she would have asked to be moved to another room or moved to another hotel. Any woman with an ounce of common sense would have done so out of fear that he might come to the hotel to finish what he allegedly started in the car.
3) No woman with an ounce of decency would stay in a room paid for by a man who just attacked her, no ifs or buts about it, as a matter of dignity, in addition to fear for her safety.
4) She did not call anyone for moral support, not even her boyfriend. Now he claims that she told him after she got back from Washington, DC, and that she was still very upset'. Huh? (refer back to hole #2)
5) She attended a Tea Party rally in Chicago in which Cain was a guest speaker over a month ago, for the purpose of confronting him. Witnesses described it as a 'flirtatious conversation' not a confrontation, with Bialek even giving Cain a hug at the start of the conversation.
6) Bialek claims to be a Republican, yet the Chicago Tea Party officials who witnessed the meeting between her & Cain stated that they do not recognize her as a member of their group.
7) She looks as if she is enjoying herself too muuuuch with the attention she is getting. Does not look like a traumatized,suffering victim by any stretch of the imagination
I don't know about the rest of you out there, but to me, these are just too many curiosities and coincidences which the media intentionally ignores and expects us to believe that these are 'long suffering' victims. Nothing that these women have said so far amounts to a hill of beans. Kraushaar was told by the NRA that they are willing to release her from her confidentiality agreement,but she prefers to continue with her smears without giving any details, leading me to believe that she is doing it for a large payoff from an 'unknown' source, and Bialek's story has more holes in it than a slice of Swiss cheese.
What a pity that the minds of the people of a country like the U.S.A. are under the control of YELLOW JOURNALISM with a biased, radical left agenda and whose vocabulary no longer includes words like ETHICS and TRUTH.
All most of us want is to be able to make a determination on the FACTS. Thus far, all we have is he said/she said. This leads people to make their own conclusions. But to characterize the backlash as vicious (and not to recognize the anonymous, vague allegations as a red flag) says alot about where you are coming from.
Proven more effective than polygraphs. The military uses this, also law enforcement and insurance industry to fight fraud
Story came out yesterday and the women suddenly decide they don't want to go on T.V......you find that funny?
http://www.breitbart.tv/investigator-uses-lie-detector-technology-to-proclaim-herman-cain-innocent/
Layered Voice analysis has been studied on know criminals and has been found to be more reliable than polygraphs...a 95% rate and polygraphs 50% rate.
Cains statement about Bielek that he did not assault her in the news conference was tested on this software and says that he is absolutely telling the truth....no doubt
Bieleks statement in her news conference was put on the software and it was conclusive that whe is in fact LYING.
This is again more reliable than polygraphs.
CBS Atlanta broke the story
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZNpvu9hjrJo