Oops: Did Texas Ban Marriage?

(AP / CBS)
The Fort Worth Star-Telegram has the story. Here's what happened: In 2005, Texas voters and the state Legislature approved a Constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage.
But the amendment included the following clause, which was reportedly designed to ban civil unions and domestic partnerships: "This state or a political subdivision of this state may not create or recognize any legal status identical or similar to marriage."
One thing that is "identical…to marriage," of course, is marriage. And Texas Attorney General candidate Barbara Ann Radnofsky, a Democrat, is arguing that the current Attorney General, Republican Greg Abbott, made a "massive mistake" in allowing the language.
"You do not have to have a fancy law degree to read this and understand what it plainly says," she said, according to the Star-Telegram. She called on Abbott to acknowledge the error and consider apologizing.
Abbott says the clause isn't a problem. His spokesman declined to directly address Radnofsky's charges but said the statute is Constitutional. A representative of the group that helped draft the amendment, meanwhile, said a lawsuit based on the wording had little chance of being successful.
But Radnofsky suggested the language clearly bans all marriage.
"Whoever vetted the language in [the clause] must have been asleep at the wheel," she said.
Popular in Politics
- FBI director acknowledges domestic drone use 152 Comments
- Obama and Berlin: Faded echoes meet new realities 77 Comments
- Next up for Obama: Major effort on climate change
- Obama on NSA programs: Americans "not getting the complete story" 259 Comments
- Immigration reform would cut deficit, analysis shows 82 Comments
- House Republicans pass 20-week limit on abortions 598 Comments
- Michelle Obama and daughters tour Berlin Play Video
- IRS readying to pay $70M in employee bonuses, senator says













Apparently ALL of our politician's are on drugs. ;O
Don't sweat the small stuff, like the law. Hate is the thing.
"This state or a political subdivision of this state may not create or recognize any legal status identical or similar to marriage."
becomes
"This state ... may not ... recognize any legal status identical ... to marriage."
Not fair at all, though, to illegitimatize all native-born Texans with one stroke of the pen.
It is only Texas' prominent Republicans who strive to convey the impression that they are b@st@rds.
Republicans are the new Liberals - they want to liberally change the laws and the US Constitution in order to make their religious beliefs and practices made into law. There is NO SUCH A THING AS A CONSERVATIVE REPUBLICAN!