November 17, 2009 4:46 PM

George Packer: U.S. "Turned our Backs" on Afghanistan

By
Brian Montopoli
Topics
On this week's edition of CBSNews.com's @katiecouric, journalist George Packer said the United States basically "turned our backs on" Afghanistan following the American-led invasion of the country.

"We never had anywhere close to the number of troops that we needed there," the New Yorker staff writer told Katie Couric. "The money we did spend was largely wasted on big contracts for private contractors who sent 90 percent of the money back to the United States. We took our eye off Afghanistan."

"We forgot that there was a Taliban," Packer added. "Turned out the Taliban had not been defeated. They had really withdrawn across the border to Pakistan and reconstituted themselves and a lot of the old figures are now back in play."

Packer blamed both a corrupt Afghan government and the U.S. for giving the Taliban a "second chance."

Military historian Kimberly Kagan also suggested to Couric that corruption in the government of Afghan leader Hamid Karzai may have helped the Taliban.

"The question is would the Taliban actually be capable of providing a competition within Afghanistan for the support of the people" if the Afghan government was more legitimate, she said, noting that "the Taliban is able to provide more services for some of the population."

She said that one of the lessons of Iraq was that it was beneficial for American officials to directly confront Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki's government for its tolerance of malign action and abuses of power.

American officials "actually confronted a number of players from Maliki down to smaller, lower level general officers, lower level officials, in order to compel them to stop those behaviors that were actually alienating the people from the state," she said.

Added Kagan: "I think that this kind of aggressive interactions, both with Karzai and members of his administration, is part of the key to success in Afghanistan."

Watch part of the conversation above, and click here to see the whole thing.

More from the conversation:

George Packer: Obama Doesn't Want War to Doom Presidency

Kimberly Kagan on How Taliban and Al-Qaeda Differ

Add a Comment
by stn_sage November 17, 2009 7:41 PM EST
Mr. Packer states in his own words, what others before him have said...AND likely what others after him will continue to say, that is...that Afghanistan is a quagmire!

So, WHY are we even considering staying?! THIS is an absolute NO-BRAINER! GET OUT! STOP THE EXPENSIVE MONETARY DRAIN OF THIS USELESS WAR!

We have a multitude of national problems that go UNSOLVED, yet this government WASTES at least $2.5 billion dollars a week in Afghanistan and Iraq?! This is GROSSLY irresponsible!

How many independent views of journalists, investigators, and government officials, saying basically the same thing, will it take, BEFORE the correct action is taken to extricate us from this fiasco?!
Reply to this comment
by Omni-Present101 November 17, 2009 7:06 PM EST
The Truth be Told, we can No Longer Continue to Borrow Money form Communist-Socialist China, to Finance our 10-20 Billion Dollars Per Month with Interest Wars.

Its "Generational Theft and Generational Debt"

Republican Talking Points


No matter what President Obama does, if he Allows these 2 Wars to Continue, These 2 Wars will Bankrupt the Nation...

What am I saying, These 2 Wars have Bankrupted the nation and will Get Worse, if President Obama does not End these 2 Wars
_______________

We Need an Exit Strategy.

We're Not going to Stay there Forever.

You can Enlist and Continue this Farce, I mean War.

Reality: Its Killing the USA Economy.
Reply to this comment
.

Follow Political Hotsheet

Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook