Political Hotsheet
By

Stephanie Condon /

CBS News/ November 11, 2009, 10:36 AM

AMA Calls for Feds to Review Marijuana Restrictions

(CBS)
The American Medical Association on Tuesday adopted a resolution calling for the government to review its classification of marijuana, in order to ease the way for more research into the use of medical marijuana.

While the AMA, the largest physician's organization in the U.S., explicitly states it does not endorse any current state-based medical marijuana programs or the legalization of marijuana, the move is a significant shift that continues a trend toward support for easing restrictions against the drug.

"Our American Medical Association (AMA) urges that marijuana's status as a federal Schedule I controlled substance be reviewed with the goal of facilitating the conduct of clinical research and development of cannabinoid-based medicines," the AMA's statement (PDF) reads. "This should not be viewed as an endorsement of state-based medical cannabis programs, the legalization of marijuana, or that scientific evidence on the therapeutic use of cannabis meets the current standards for a prescription drug product."

Marijuana is currently classified by the federal government as a "Schedule I" controlled substance, the most restrictive of five categories. Schedule I substances are considered to have a high potential for abuse, no accepted medical use and a lack of accepted safety for use of the drug. Other drugs in that category include heroin, LSD and PCP. Less restrictive "Schedule II" substances include cocaine and methamphetamine.

Previously, the AMA recommended marijuana remain a Schedule I controlled substance, but it now believes the substance deserves more clinical research.

CBSNews.com Special Report: Marijuana Nation

"Despite more than 30 years of clinical research, only a small number of randomized, controlled trials have been conducted on smoked cannabis," Dr. Edward Langston, an AMA board member, told the Los Angeles Times. Limited studies, he said, are "insufficient to satisfy the current standards for a prescription drug product."

The White House drug czar's office gave a muted response to the AMA's recommendation, the LA Times reports, saying it would defer to "the FDA's judgment that the raw marijuana plant cannot meet the standards for identity, strength, quality, purity, packaging and labeling required of medicine."

While the Obama administration opposes legalization of marijuana, the Justice Department last month announced it would no longer pursue prosecution for state-sanctioned medical marijuana sales. As many as 13 states now allow the use of medical marijuana.

The debate over whether to legalize marijuana all together seems to be gaining steam. A Gallup poll last month showed a record 44 percent of Americans now support legalizing marijuana. Meanwhile, California residents may get to vote on a 2010 ballot measure to legalize the drug in the state.

A New Era for U.S. Drug Policy?
Point-Counterpoint: Should Pot Be Legal?
Inside Holland's "Half Baked" Pot Policy
America's Love-Hate History with Pot
Pot Not Focus of Anti-Drug Campaigns
Does the Pot Pill Work?
© 2009 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
52 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
malcolm-kyle says:
The following text is taken directly from the US government's National Cancer Institute website: http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/pdq/cam/cannabis/healthprofessional/page4

* ANTI-TUMOR EFFECTS

One study in mice and rats suggested that cannabinoids may have a protective effect against the development of certain types of tumors. During this 2-year study, groups of mice and rats were given various doses of THC by gavage. A dose-related decrease in the incidence of hepatic adenoma tumors and hepatocellular carcinoma was observed in the mice. Decreased incidences of benign tumors (polyps and adenomas) in other organs (mammary gland, uterus, pituitary, testis, and pancreas) were also noted in the rats. In another study, delta-9-THC, delta-8-THC, and cannabinol were found to inhibit the growth of Lewis lung adenocarcinoma cells in vitro and in vivo. In addition, other tumors have been shown to be sensitive to cannabinoid-induced growth inhibition.

Cannabinoids may cause antitumor effects by various mechanisms, including induction of cell death, inhibition of cell growth, and inhibition of tumor angiogenesis and metastasis. Cannabinoids appear to kill tumor cells but do not affect their nontransformed counterparts and may even protect them from cell death. These compounds have been shown to induce apoptosis in glioma cells in culture and induce regression of glioma tumors in mice and rats. Cannabinoids protect normal glial cells of astroglial and oligodendroglial lineages from apoptosis mediated by the CB1 receptor.

In an in vivo model using severe combined immunodeficient mice, subcutaneous tumors were generated by inoculating the animals with cells from human non-small cell lung carcinoma cell lines. Tumor growth was inhibited by 60% in THC-treated mice compared with vehicle-treated control mice. Tumor specimens revealed that THC had antiangiogenic and antiproliferative effects.

.... There is far more than I have space for here.

* ANTI-INFLAMMATORY EFFECTS

In addition, both plant-derived and endogenous cannabinoids have been studied for anti- inflammatory effects. A mouse study demonstrated that endogenous cannabinoid system signaling is likely to provide intrinsic protection against colonic inflammation. As a result, a hypothesis that phytocannabinoids and endocannabinoids may be useful in the prevention and treatment of colorectal cancer has been developed.

* ANTIVIRAL PROPERTIES

Another study has shown delta-9-THC is a potent and selective antiviral agent against Kaposi sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV), also known as human herpesvirus 8. The researchers concluded that additional studies on cannabinoids and herpesviruses are warranted, as they may lead to the development of drugs that inhibit the reactivation of these oncogenic viruses. Subsequently, another group of investigators reported increased efficiency of KSHV infection of human dermal microvascular epithelial cells in the presence of low doses of delta-9-THC.

* APPETITE STIMULATOR

Many animal studies have previously demonstrated that delta-9-THC and other cannabinoids have a stimulatory effect on appetite and increase food intake. It is believed that the endogenous cannabinoid system may serve as a regulator of feeding behavior. The endogenous cannabinoid anandamide potently enhances appetite in mice. Moreover, CB1 receptors in the hypothalamus may be involved in the motivational or reward aspects of eating.

* AS A PAIN KILLER

The understanding of the mechanism of cannabinoid-induced analgesia has been increased through the study of cannabinoid receptors (endocannabinoids), and synthetic agonists and antagonists. The CB1 receptor is found in both the central nervous system (CNS) and in peripheral nerve terminals. Similar to opioid receptors, increased levels of the CB1 receptor are found in sections of the brain that regulate nociceptive processing. CB2 receptors, located predominantly in peripheral tissue, exist at very low levels in the CNS. With the development of receptor-specific antagonists, much additional information about the roles of the receptors and the endogenous cannabinoids in the modulation of pain has also been obtained.

Cannabinoids may also contribute to pain modulation through an anti-inflammatory mechanism; a CB2 effect with cannabinoids acting on mast cell receptors to attenuate the release of inflammatory agents, such as histamine and serotonin, and on keratinocytes to enhance the release of analgesic opioids.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
ace77777 says:
there wanting to make useless pills as you know with multivitamins the herb it's self is more beneficial!!!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
dennbee says:
What really bothers me is that even in light of all the evidence that cannabis is non-toxic, has medicinal properties and is recreationally safer than alcohol, the enforcement cartel still spews out the same old, tired lies and misinformation expecting us to blindly accept their twisted logic. We are the internet generation folks, the truth spreads like a virus and it is this truth that is behind the exceptional increase for the support of legal cannabis. We are witness to bad law being slowly deconstructed by the will of an active and informed people. Those who continue to support cannabis prohibition fit the classic definition of idiots...they use the same old tools, time after time, and expect different result each year. Cannabis use is up year after year. Volumes are up year after year. Arrests are up year after year. Lives and futures are ruined year after year. Show me where we have made good use of the billions we are throwing at cannabis prohibition! There is a better way, read...

?Our nation can acknowledge the dangers of cigarettes, alcohol and marijuana while still permitting their use. The only logically and morally consistent argument for marijuana prohibition necessitates the criminalization of all harmful recreational drugs, including alcohol, nicotine and caffeine. We can agree that such an infringement on personal freedoms is as impractical as it is un-American. The time has come to accept that our nation's attitude toward marijuana has been misguided for generations and that the only rational approach to cannabis is to legalize, regulate and tax it.?
Dr. Nathan, a psychiatrist in Princeton, N.J., is a clinical assistant professor at Robert Wood Johnson Medical School.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
dennbee says:
What really bothers me is that even in light of all the evidence that cannabis is non-toxic, has medicinal properties and is recreationally safer than alcohol, the enforcement cartel still spews out the same old, tired lies and misinformation expecting us to blindly accept their twisted logic. We are the internet generation folks, the truth spreads like a virus and it is this truth that is behind the exceptional increase for the support of legal cannabis. We are witness to bad law being slowly deconstructed by the will of an active and informed people. Those who continue to support cannabis prohibition fit the classic definition of idiots...they use the same old tools, time after time, and expect different result each year. Cannabis use is up year after year. Volumes are up year after year. Arrests are up year after year. Lives and futures are ruined year after year. Show me where we have made good use of the billions we are throwing at cannabis prohibition! There is a better was, read...

?Our nation can acknowledge the dangers of cigarettes, alcohol and marijuana while still permitting their use. The only logically and morally consistent argument for marijuana prohibition necessitates the criminalization of all harmful recreational drugs, including alcohol, nicotine and caffeine. We can agree that such an infringement on personal freedoms is as impractical as it is un-American. The time has come to accept that our nation's attitude toward marijuana has been misguided for generations and that the only rational approach to cannabis is to legalize, regulate and tax it.?
Dr. Nathan, a psychiatrist in Princeton, N.J., is a clinical assistant professor at Robert Wood Johnson Medical School.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
CAMP420 says:
Can anyone explain to me why in the world CBS banned this NORML video ad? It is totally harmless and it is important to get the message that drug reform needs to happen now. So, what's up CBS?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0tqW9Kj8DVU
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
CAMP420 says:
I hope with the AMA's recent declaration that they disagree with having Marijuana side by side with other schedule I drugs like Heroin, Ecstasy, & LSD, that the laws will change soon.

I recently had tears in my eyes talking to a patient of mine with PTSD.
What brought tears to my eyes was the fact that he suffers with PTSD, Post Traumatic Stress Disorder and is unable to sleep most nights.
"The nightmares will never go away", he explained to me. This kind gentleman has tried multiple anti-depressants and multiple sleeping medications, none of which have successfully brought him a good night's rest.

And I am not supposed to even suggest marijuana because it's illegal.

Until the law changes, I guess maybe I'll just keep my mouth shut.
Then again, maybe he will just happen upon an article or two left in plain sight for him to read.

Rain Baker, RN, BSN, MSN
Organizer
Campaign Against Marijuana Prohibition CAMP420
www.meetup.com/camp420


References:
http://medicalmarijuana.procon.org/viewsource.asp?ID=134
http://www.salem-news.com/articles/february132009/mj_vs_drugs_2-13-09.php
http://salem-news.com/articles/june142007/leveque_61407.php
http://blog.marijuanamedicine.com/?p=110


You can also Join CAMP420 on FaceBook, MySpace and/or Twitter
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
yazooclay says:
The criminalization of marijuana was never about how bad it is for you. Proof of this is that alcohol is legal. Alcohol kills and disables thousands of people in this country every year. I am in my mid 50's and have seen at least a dozen of my friends ruined by alcohol and several have died as a result. To be legitimate as far as making marijuana illegal in order to protect us, then alcohol should be made illegal also. Otherwise, the law is very clearly based on a lie and that in itself is a disaster because it leads the public to lose trust in the justice of the system.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Dgunner says:
There should be laws put in place to protect general society from abusers of MJ. You can only get so high and you pass out or get sick. If one or both of these aren't happening to you ? Then you have been ripped from your money.If a roadside test can be introduced that indicates you are high and driving? Then you lose your automobile to the state right then and there. If money is owed on the auto ? Either return it to the lien holder or sell it at auction.The same needs to be enacted for DWI.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
msjb1 says:
who will we sue for all of us getting cancer from the second hand smoke or is that covered by obamas health care package.
reply
MatterofLiberty replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
The second hand smoke argument is not valid. If you are worried about carcinogens being released in our atmosphere or near your kids you'll need to start with cars, fireplaces, charcoal grills, its a long list really. But lets not forget Cannabis gets burned many times regardless if its by a consumer or if its DEA burning a pile of confiscated plants.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Logicmarton says:
Drug fiend, pot head, doper, freak: After 56 years i wear these names as a tribute to my personal freedoms!!
reply
steve8313 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Amen, brother!
See all 52 Comments