Political Hotsheet
By

Brian Montopoli /

CBS News/ November 10, 2009, 2:48 PM

Liberal Base "Worried" About Obama Agenda

(AP Photo/Damian Dovarganes)
Jane Hamsher, the founder of liberal blog FireDogLake.com, said in an interview Tuesday that the liberal base is "worried" about the Obama administration and may "stay home" in the 2010 midterm elections.

Hamsher compared the current situation to the 1994 elections, when, she said, the Democratic base (including union members) was demoralized and disengaged following the passage of The North American Free Trade Agreement. Republicans took control of both the House and Senate in that contest.

She argued that the Obama administration is paying little attention to its base even as the opposition gins up support among the Republican base with events like the Tea Party protests.

"If you're suppressing your base, and the other side is revving up theirs, and midterm elections are all about turning out the base, I sort of question what their strategy is here," she said.

Hamsher has signed on to a financial boycott of the Democratic National Committee, Organizing for America (the DNC-run operation to mobilize Obama supporters) and the Obama campaign. The boycott was organized by Americablog's John Aravosis and Joe Sudbay over what they see as President Obama and his party's failure to keep its commitments to the gay and lesbian community.

"LGBT Americans, our families, and our friends kept our promise at the ballot box, we now expect President Obama to keep his in the White House," they wrote. In addition to Hamsher, cosponsors include the liberal blog Daily Kos, writer and editor Dan Savage and radio host Michelangelo Signorile.

The boycott will be lifted, Aravosis and Sudbay write, when legislation is signed enacting the Employment Non-Discrimination Act, repealing Don't Ask, Don't Tell and repealing the Defense of Marriage Act. During the presidential campaign, Mr. Obama pledged action on all these issues but has not pressed them since entering office.

"We respect the right of anyone to express their views and always are willing to listen," a DNC official told Hotsheet in response to the boycott. "And, we recognize that there is much more to do. We do, however, take pride in the historic accomplishments which we have been able to achieve with the help of the community just nine months into the president's term and are we going to continue to work for greater equality and justice for all Americans."

Accomplishments cited by the official included signing into law an extension of hate crimes protections for LGBT citizens, extending benefits for same-sex partners of federal employees, hiring record numbers of LGBT Americans, and extending the Ryan White HIV/AIDS Treatment Extension Act.

That's not enough for some on the left, however – and LGBT issues are not the only ones generating anger. Separate from the Americablog effort, another boycott is being organized by Markos Moulitsas of Daily Kos. He is calling on his readers not to donate to the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee because it is supporting candidates who voted against the health care reform bill. "Instead, give to those elected officials who best reflect your values," he writes.

In addition to signing onto the Americablog boycott, Hamsher pushed her readers to unsubscribe to the Organizing for America mailing list, which is believed to include 12 - 13 million names. Liberals have been unhappy with OFA for not doing more on progressive causes like the gay marriage referendum in Maine.

"They don't want to go out on issues that would make supporters of that list happy," said Hamsher. "They're triangulating against that list."

The DNC official counters that the president remains popular with liberals (and "across the political spectrum") and notes that Democrats have won all five special elections this year – evidence, the official suggested, that the base is not demoralized.
© 2009 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
46 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Ronbo1960 says:
So being anti-war is "far left"? I am ashaimed of the Americans (?) on this comment strip. Do you think equality is also "far left"? I bet half these people making comments are religious bigots who would bash LGBT Americans, if given the chance.

If you don't like American-style Freedoms, move. We don't need more Palin fascists.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
wheresclair says:
People need to understand that when they elect a candidate, it is a long term investment. The newly elected official has to work within the framework of what he or she can legally do unilaterally or in concert with peers and the order and timing of what they try to accomplish depends hugely on those peers, the current national climate, and the vocal support of their base. When the base gets impatient and questions their candidate's commitment to their cause, the opposition jumps in and becomes empowered. For example, in the case of Barack Obama and the issue of "Gay Rights," there is no question that he is committed to equal rights for Gays and Lesbians. The question is HOW to make it happen. Obama is very intelligent and understands politics and timing very well. He knows he has to have several strong and widely popular political successes before he can insert something like Gay Rights on to the public stage. Give him the time and the support to get into that position of advantage. Quit nit-picking and whining. You voted for him, trust him. If you splinter the party now, the opposition WILL make large gains in 2010 and then your cause will be lost ? possibly for decades. You CAN oppose Obama like a 12 year old not getting their way, or you can see the big picture that you are falling right into the hands of the opposition that's just waiting for opportunities to split the party. If the party splits, they win every time! If they win, it will be the fault of those too immature to give him some time. Another example is this abortion issue. If liberals bail or threaten to bail on the health bill, it's gone...possibly forever. Instead, they need to get in there and just make sure the language stays the same so neither side gains the advantage. Grow up people; don't throw it all away on ?principle,? because the alternative is soooo much worse. If you fail to support the Democratic Party or fail to vote ?on principle? you?ll see what it?ll get you?it will get you the opposite of what you want! Don't fall into the opposition's hands! Yeah, you?ll be sending the world a message all right?you?ll be looking pretty dumb to have defeated yourselves!
reply
jdblue82 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Clair our cause is just as lost if Obama fails to act. He's demonstrated via inaction on several issues that LGBT equality is not on the top of his list. My civil rights, while they might not be a priority to him, are a priority to me.

Yet this President, nine months into his term, has failed to push for the repeal of DADT, the passage of employment and housing non-discrimination law, and has missed yet another opportunity (Maine) to speak out against discriminatory ballot propositions.

Other than hate crimes legislation, which has taken the Democrats over a decade to pass, there has been no significant support of LGBT Americans by the political party that claims to best represent them. Well, we've given and given, and gotten nothing in return. Why on Earth should we funnel money into the DNC or a pathetic excuse for "fierce" advocacy from the White House, President Obama's OFA? It's not like the Republicans did any worse for us over the last decade. Maybe another few years of them in Congress and the DNC will start keeping its promises.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
bacaangel says:
That is what the GOP want -- a divided base! Democrats must not be "hoodwinked and fooled" into an abortion fight that does not really exist! We should be smarter than that... We must keep our "eye" on the Prize -- Goal of healthcare for all Americans and lower premiums for those who are already insured. Democrats have a chance to lead by actually doing something good for Americans -- like health care, which is tied to the deficit and the bankrupting of businesses and families. We must keep our "eye" on the Prize and not be labeled with the title of another "do nothing Congress"!

GOP politicians and operatives continue to dishonestly and deceptively say that they cannot support a public option, they claim that they want to keep costs down for the American people! Really? This they claim all the while knowing that a public option/competition is the only way to really control cost and to bring about true reform thereby putting a definite Halt to the ?out of control? medical costs and premiums crippling people and businesses today, making it harder and harder for average Americans and young people to realize and take advantage of the slowly, slipping away American Dream. One could ask themselves, If you happen to lose your job today or tomorrow in these unstable economic times and at a time when we currently do not have healthcare reform for all, who would pay you or your familiy's health care costs, that is, if you are lucky enough to be able to see a doctor without insurance? This American Dream, now being called Socialism by the GOP has slowly been slipping away, and is in the last throes of dying, if we do not forge a new path onwards toward inclusion and cooperation for all. This dream of America will die to be replaced with just another third world country -- only to go by the wayside and into the history books as another failed experiment.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
wdh3007 says:
Now even the liberals and democratic voters who once suppported the change are just now starting to see how poorly organized, misrepresented, unqualified and out of touch this administration really is. I hope every single millitary person and civilian votes in 2010 because today if an election was held even old man Mcain would win!
reply
tonyatq replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Get real McCain will never will even today.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
askagain says:
The liberal base needs to understand that President Obama must be president for all Americans. This sometimes means compromising. Otherwise, little or nothing is apt to get accomplished. Further, every President needs the support of independent voters who are results oriented rather than dedicated to a political party. The independent voters swing back and forth depending on what they like or dislike. These are political realities.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
CD_R2 says:
Obama is a fraud and a failure. Lots of people have known this for a while now. Glad to see the Democrats have figured it out too.
reply
environmental_wacko replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
You're projecting.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
bubbadubba says:
Never heard of her or her stupid blog.
Who cares?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
sonofsummarex says:
I hope they continue to be concerned.

By not allowing himself to be dragged into their ultra left wing causes, Obama has been able to stay on the side of the people and govern effectively. I would rather have this, than homosexual marriages, drug legalization, more abortions and a failed president.
reply
jumkey replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
What, the last failed President wasn't enough for you?
tonyatq replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
You are right! The president must be a president for all. I don' t necessary agree with everything he does but I am willing to compromise.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
FauxNews says:
Now that Obama has deployed 40,000 more troops to the Middle East, the liberals will no longer have to "worry" about Obama, they can down right "know" he doesn't represent them.
reply
bluedenmant replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
got your crystal ball out again, I see...
linkicon reporticon emailicon
vpcharan says:
Why should they not be? Instead of staying home, I suggest that the base should organize and field candidates as independents to challenge the democrats who are up for election next year. This includes senator Reid who is nothing but a whimp. Target Lincoln, Bayh, Conrad, Bacus, Nelson of Nebraska and all other BLUE RATS in the democratic caucus. Each of these folks are sold out to Insurance companies and they are unfit to hold public office. Staying home does not help the cause, but only emboldens these corrupt senators.
reply
velma179 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
by vpcharan November 10, 2009 7:42 PM EST

I don't know if your post references mine, but I will reply to yours.

I am not a member of any political party, so of course I have no issue with people switching from one to another...

I do have a HUGE issue with the whole "constant election cycle" thing.

Sure, Lincoln, Bayh, Nelson etc. should be held accountable for being seemingly more (R) than (D) while they retain their seats within the Democrat majority party.

But -- and this is a tough one, they are from districts where primary challenges COULD bring more liberal/left wing Dems on as the candidate ... but would this candidate win? Personally, I don't want to see a Republican majority again for long enough to correct the past mistakes made by that team.

There is value in holding the majority in Congress, even though it is totally frustrating to those of us with expectations that when that majority is called Democrat, we aren't going to have Republican ideology making the laws.

So, I get annoyed at the special interest voters, because it seems those who think like this tend to be the loudest and in that, the driving force towards the "endless election".

We're supposed to be the actual majority (the country is either called center-right or center-left depending on who says it), but it is sometimes very difficult being in the "does anyone hear me" center.

Is it asking too much for those who have been elected -- to take a break from being elected again and ...govern?
See all 46 Comments