October 30, 2009 5:59 PM

Lobbyist Appears Before Congress to Explain Fake Letters

By
Brian Montopoli
Topics
Congress
2334368In June, lawmakers received letters ostensibly from the NAACP and local Hispanic, seniors, women and veterans groups stating that those organizations had serious reservations about the then-pending climate change legislation.

Eventually they learned the letters, which were printed on official stationary, weren't real: They had come from a D.C. lobbying group called Bonner and Associates, which is headed by Jack Bonner. (Here's one sample.) Yesterday Bonner was called before House lawmakers to explain the fake letters. He took responsibility, National Public Radio reports, but also claimed he knew nothing about them when they were drafted.

"This improper activity was undertaken without the knowledge of anyone at our firm. It was the actions of one rogue temporary employee, acting on his own, against our company's policies and without the knowledge of anyone else at Bonner and Associates," Bonner said. He said the employee had been fired.

TPM Muckraker, citing internal company documents, reported Thursday that the coal industry paid more than $7 million over the past fiscal year to a company that hired Bonner and Associates.

Falsely offering up evidence of ostensibly grassroots support for a particular position is known as "astroturfing," and it's a common tactic in Washington. NPR reports that to protest the practice, conservation activists showed up at the hearing in suits covered in fake plastic grass.

The climate bill ended up passing the House by a slim margin, 219-212, even though the Democrats have a sizable majority in the chamber.

Add a Comment
by U_S_Drug_Addict October 31, 2009 5:17 PM EDT
Typical Republican...
Reply to this comment
by starleo146 October 31, 2009 6:30 PM EDT
Who was it Gordon Libby? He is a expert at being a fall guy.
by stuart-johns2 October 31, 2009 7:51 AM EDT
So Bonner's company made the employee a scapegoat. I don't believe a word of this story.
Reply to this comment
by chelseacos October 31, 2009 1:43 AM EDT
Isn't the real problem that we have lobbyists in the first place? When did when decide to surrender our representation to lobbyists? A long time ago, but that does not mean we should be okay with it. We haven't been a true republic for a long time. Instead of politicians representing the citizens of this country they represent lobbyists and their own political agenda. Ben Franklin said "When the people find that they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic." Well, it ended a long time ago. People should stop focusing on the small crimes until we have re-established our nation as a republic, run by a government that truly represents it's citizens - not which group paid them the most. It's absurd what people are willing to over-look. There are far bigger crimes to address than this one, not that this is excusable, but should it take precedence over the much larger, more far reaching crimes?
Reply to this comment
by stuart-johns2 October 31, 2009 7:55 AM EDT
Lobbyist from corporate America run the show anymore. Our Constitution is no longer about "We the people", unless of course you're one of the people who owns a too big to fail-corporation.
by bradkt1 October 30, 2009 8:47 PM EDT
These guys are snakes. At a minumum, they have infringed on the trademark of the NAACP. At worst, they have committed fraud.
Reply to this comment
by greco99-2009 October 30, 2009 8:33 PM EDT
Everyone wants to prosecute 'balloon boy' hoaxer Richard Heene.

What about these 'professional hoaxers'?
Reply to this comment
by greco99-2009 October 30, 2009 8:30 PM EDT
NAACP should sue for money damages based on trademark infringement.

I believe that this type of willful infringement is criminal (e.g. if some uses fake Disney logos/letter the FBI will investigate possible criminal trademark infringement). Naacp or law enforcement can bring the action here, I think.

A search of the public record might turn up more letters /evidence. If more letters exist, then the claim of a 'rogue' employee may be perjury.

Also, probably a fraud case here as well.
Reply to this comment
.

Follow Political Hotsheet

Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook