prev
next
Political Hotsheet
Pelosi Tries to Change the Name of the Public Option
5209744Everyone thought the public option was off life support when Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) announced yesterday that a government-run health insurance plan would be in the Senate bill.
The proposal is certainly gaining momentum in Congress, but the word "public" could be in trouble. Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) tried to change the terminology today when she emerged from a Democratic caucus meeting on health care.
"It's not really a public option, it's a consumer option," Pelosi said. "As we're mandating that people buy insurance we are saying to them, you have leverage, you have another choice. This is your consumer option." To back up her point, Pelosi said that the program would be self-sustaining and benefits would be paid for by premiums, not taxpayers.
Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) was quick to endorse Pelosi's new lingo. "She's absolutely right, a consumer option," Hoyer said.
Changing the language of a heated debate is nothing new in Congress. Last year, when the economy was in freefall and Congress had to step in with $700 billion dollars to keep big banks from collapsing, lawmakers changed the toxic term "bailout" to the more innocuous "Troubled Asset Relief Program," or TARP. If members say it enough, it can eventually make it into media reports and then into everyday American terminology.
Joe Lieberman Says He'll Block Reid's Health Care Bill
Track the Progress of Health Care Legislation
CBSNews.com Special Report: Health Care
Perhaps House Democratic leadership is trying to get the term "public" out of people's minds since the term is at the heart of the debate on health care reform. Republicans seize on the word and say it's nothing short of a government takeover of the health care system. The word "public" also conjures to mind Medicare and Medicaid, truly public programs supported with taxpayer dollars.
Republican Leader John Boehner's spokesman Michael Steel says the new term won't do Democrats any good. "It didn't matter what they called Crystal Pepsi, no one wanted to drink it. No matter how the Democrats 're-brand' their government takeover of health care, the American people oppose it."
At the same time, with Reid's announcement that he'll proceed with a public option in the Senate where states could opt-out, House Democrats are more confident than ever that their health care bill will include some form of public option- or consumer option. Debates that raged last week over the public plan and doctor reimbursement rates are waved off by Democrats as minor differences that are now being worked through.
Speaker Pelosi spiced up the language there, too, calling competing public options "good choices."
Jill Jackson is a CBS News Capitol Hill Producer. You can read more of her posts in Hotsheet here. You can also follow her on Twitter.
© 2009 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. The proposal is certainly gaining momentum in Congress, but the word "public" could be in trouble. Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) tried to change the terminology today when she emerged from a Democratic caucus meeting on health care.
"It's not really a public option, it's a consumer option," Pelosi said. "As we're mandating that people buy insurance we are saying to them, you have leverage, you have another choice. This is your consumer option." To back up her point, Pelosi said that the program would be self-sustaining and benefits would be paid for by premiums, not taxpayers.
Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) was quick to endorse Pelosi's new lingo. "She's absolutely right, a consumer option," Hoyer said.
Changing the language of a heated debate is nothing new in Congress. Last year, when the economy was in freefall and Congress had to step in with $700 billion dollars to keep big banks from collapsing, lawmakers changed the toxic term "bailout" to the more innocuous "Troubled Asset Relief Program," or TARP. If members say it enough, it can eventually make it into media reports and then into everyday American terminology.
Joe Lieberman Says He'll Block Reid's Health Care Bill
Track the Progress of Health Care Legislation
CBSNews.com Special Report: Health Care
Perhaps House Democratic leadership is trying to get the term "public" out of people's minds since the term is at the heart of the debate on health care reform. Republicans seize on the word and say it's nothing short of a government takeover of the health care system. The word "public" also conjures to mind Medicare and Medicaid, truly public programs supported with taxpayer dollars.
Republican Leader John Boehner's spokesman Michael Steel says the new term won't do Democrats any good. "It didn't matter what they called Crystal Pepsi, no one wanted to drink it. No matter how the Democrats 're-brand' their government takeover of health care, the American people oppose it."
At the same time, with Reid's announcement that he'll proceed with a public option in the Senate where states could opt-out, House Democrats are more confident than ever that their health care bill will include some form of public option- or consumer option. Debates that raged last week over the public plan and doctor reimbursement rates are waved off by Democrats as minor differences that are now being worked through.
Speaker Pelosi spiced up the language there, too, calling competing public options "good choices."
(CBS)
Popular in Politics
- Obama prom pictures surface 113 Comments
- Is President Obama ending the war on terror? 136 Comments
- Now, some unions upset over Obamacare
- IRS official Lois Lerner placed on leave 126 Comments
- IRS' Lerner was asked to resign, refused: GOP Sen.
- Rand Paul uses 2016 bully pulpit to push Obama on drones
- Protester heckles Obama during counterterrorism speech Play Video
- Obama to tour Jersey Shore with Gov. Christie
Most Popular
-
01
-
02
-
03
-
04
-
05
Most Shared
Most Discussed
The GOP just unveiled there new health care reform plan.
Basicly it recomends that you don't ever get sick.
But if you do it recomends that you die quickly.
Since the public won't be getting affordable coverage from a govt-sponsored program, they certainly AREN'T going to purchase USURIOUS insurance from private insurance companies!
Therefore, her reasoning is...IF we don't call it the 'public option' and call it the 'consumer option' instead, we can con the public into believing it's NOT the same thing...and if it's NOT the same thing, THEN they CAN'T protest and REFUSE to purchase OVER-PRICED insurance from the private companies!
My response: You're wrong, Nancy! The public CAN refuse and they WILL refuse...regardless of your Orwellian attempt to deceive them!
Shame on you, Nancy! I thought the Democrats wanted to help the public...but, you're really NO different than the Reps...you both work for corporate America...and d*a*m*n the public!
She most likely consulted Bill Clinton on this one for play-on-words.
Changing the name to 'consumer option' is like trying to pick up a turd by the clean end.