Obama's Next "Most Important Speech"
(AP Photo/Gerald Herbert)
It presents an opportunity to deliver another "most important speech" of his brief presidency. And, the prestigious award more that makes up for the loss of the Olympic Games in Chicago in terms of political capital if you are keeping score.
While a chorus of politicians and pundits contend that Mr. Obama is undeserving of such a prestigious award and the $1.4 million, he didn't ask for or campaign for this honor, didn't know he was in the running and didn't have a clue that it was coming his way, the White House said.
The five members of the Norwegian Nobel Committee appointed by the Storting (Norwegian parliament) apparently wanted to send a message of hope for world peace in the person of Barack Obama, who become president of the United States 12 days before the Nobel nomination deadline last February.
The Nobel Committee was mesmerized by Mr. Obama's "Yes We Can" campaign promises, historic election, and the changing the tone of international diplomacy from the previous administration, which didn't make a lot of friends in Europe.
"Only very rarely has a person to the same extent as Obama captured the world's attention and given its people hope for a better future," the Nobel Committee said.
Bob Schieffer, CBS News chief Washington correspondent, said that the Nobel Committee's choice for the Peace Prize is based largely on Mr. Obama winning the election. (Watch Schieffer at left.)
"President Bush was very unpopular in Europe and it is almost as if this is more of a comment on the previous administration than it is on the new one," Schieffer said. The partisan divide in Congress will not be bridged by the Nobel honor, which is based on aspirations and not action, he added.
"This is not going to help the president," he said.
Former Polish President Lech Walesa, who won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1983 after co-founding the trade union Solidarity and led the 1980 strike in the Gdansk shipyards against the Soviet-bloc government, said, "So soon? Too early. He has no contribution so far. He is still at an early stage. He is only beginning to act. This is probably an encouragement for him to act. Let's see if he perseveres. Let's give him time to act."
John Dickerson of Slate and CBS consultant on politics, as well as sometime anchor of Washington Unplugged, has outlined some basic talking points of a rejection of the award by the president:
"One debate will be whether Obama should turn down the prize, as Slate's Mickey Kaus suggests. That would be a slap to the committee, but since awards are being given for atmospherics let's consider the atmospherics of such a move. Obama could easily write the justifying language: He's honored and humbled but he has merely articulated the common aspirations of all mankind. As it is mankind's global challenge, no one man can claim a prize with so much work left to be done. It is rather for us to be here dedicated to the great task remaining before us. (Ben Rhodes and Jon Favreau could certainly find the language).
"In the quarters where his speechmaking and diplomatic flair are praised, such a performance will only enhance his reputation. His critics will be dumbfounded. The arrogance rap will fade. Obama would immediately become the favorite for next year's Nobel Prize for Humility."
In his remarks this morning from the White House Rose Garden, Mr. Obama deflected the prestigious honor from himself, saying that the award goes to the American people.
"I am both surprised and deeply humbled.... I don't view it as a recognition of my own accomplishments but rather an affirmation of American leadership on behalf of aspirations held by people in all nations," he said.
The president added that he doesn't feel he deserves to be in the company of people honored previously by the Nobel Prize, but the honor gives "momentum to a set of ideas" and a call to action.
"This award must be shared by everyone who strives for justice and dignity," he said.
The next act in his Nobel journey will be to deliver a speech that inspires the world, but those words will travel only so far. For the next act in his presidency, Mr. Obama will have to make good on his multitude of promises -- close Guantanamo Bay, end the Iraq War, defeat al Qaeda, provide universal healthcare, peace in the Middle East and deal with climate change, nuclear proliferation and the economy.
As the former Polish president said, "Let's give him time to act."
One of his first acts will be to determine whether sending up to 40,000 more U.S. troops to Afghanistan is a path toward peace in the troubled region.
More CBSNews.com Coverage on Obama Winning the Nobel Peace Prize:
Obama: Nobel Prize a "Call To Action"
Analysis: Nobel Peace Prize Doesn't Help Obama
Obama's Nobel Win: A "Mission Accomplished" Moment?
The Audacity of the Nobel Committee
Nobel Peace Prize an Unprecedented Honor for Obama
Placing a Wager on Peace
Nobel Peace Prize Shocks Bloggers: "This is Insane"
Obama's Remarks: Video Text
Politics of Obama's Nobel Win
Washington Unplugged: Nobel Prize "Complicates Things" for Obama
Nobel Peace Prize Photos
What's your opinion:
- Pop Question
Popular in Politics
- Obama prom pictures surface 90 Comments
- Obama: America at a "crossroads" in fighting terrorism 94 Comments
- IRS official Lois Lerner placed on leave
- Protester heckles Obama during counterterrorism speech Play Video
- Lawmakers push to punish sexual offenders in the military
- Boehner calls out Obama administration's "arrogance of power" 97 Comments
- Drones, Gitmo part of broad Obama counterterrorism speech
- Rep. Jo Bonner to resign from House for university job
Why is it that some in our country are upset by that? What does it say about people who don't think our President should be that popular on the world stage?
Other countries leaders come here so they can shine as world leaders back home. Their citizens WANT their leaders involved in the world but in America, we alone, hate when our President is popular in the world. Especially republicans hate that Obama is that popular in the world.
Interestingly, I read a European poll today (sorry, forgot the link) which stated that most nations citizens have more faith in our President to make smart decisions about their countries foreign policy objectives than they have in their own leaders.
The world in general supports and trusts our President in terms of handling world affairs. Why don't republicans?
There is something sinister about the republican party in this country. Very sinister.
I HAVE TO HAND IT TO YOU GUYS...THIS IS THE FUNNIEST THING I HAVE READ IN WEEKS.
(THIS ISN'T SERIOUS, IS IT?)
It is an award that proclaims freedom from the dark ages that our last administration dragged us and the entire world into. It is affirmation from the sane world which attests that the vision of freedoms, of human rights, of peace, of global cooperation in all matters is what Obama stands for and something the world wants Obama to succeed at.
The republicans who oppose this do so for obvious nefarious reasons. The republicans cannot see the entire picture through their antiquated biases and hate.
It's interesting that not one republican said on any of the posts today that they felt proud of America for recieving this award vicariously through their President. That is all too telling of their real motivatiions in objecting to this award.
The republicans will of course use this against Obama and once again prove that they will cut off their nose to spite their face. It is their award too but they won't care. Obama was associated with it and that's reason enough to say no to it.
This an award which reflects the hopes and aspirations of millions of people around the world. It's too bad the republicans can't join with us in those hopes.
Obama should be given the nobel peace prize just for having to deal with these un-american republicans.
stuart, you say"Obama should be given the Noble Peace Prize"
They did give it to him. He did nothing to earn it.
==================
I said they should give him a prize for putting up with the likes of the republican party. Read Travesty. READ! I know they already gave him the Nobel Peace Prize. Geeeesh In other words, just for your delicate intellect, they should have given Obama TWO prizes. Get it?