Tim Pawlenty Launches PAC, Setting Stage for 2012

(AP Photo/John Watson-Riley)
The Republican today officially announced the launch of his Political Action Committee, "Freedom First," which "will offer financial support to candidates committed to putting freedom before government, and provide organizational support for Pawlenty to promote his innovative, conservative message."
In a release announcing the PAC, Pawlenty previewed his potential line of criticism against President Obama, saying, "Right now, our freedoms are being challenged on many fronts."
"This organization is dedicated to putting freedom first again in America," he said. "By helping candidates and translating our ideas into policies that everyone can relate to and support, we can turn back the growth of Washington and renew the promise of freedom."
Launching a PAC is a standard move for politicians laying the groundwork for a presidential run. Pawlenty has announced he will not run for a third term as governor next year.
Hotsheet reported Pawlenty's plans to launch the PAC on September 22nd. As CBS News political director Steve Chaggaris pointed out, doing so provides Pawlenty "with money to financially support Republican candidates around the country - picking up political chits along the way - as well as fund his own political travel."
Pawlenty's PAC will be co-chaired by Morgan Stanley Vice Chairman William H. Strong and former Minnesota congressman Vin Weber.
The first fundraiser for Pawlenty's PAC will be November 4th in Minneapolis; entry to the reception is $1,000, and entry to the dinner is $5,000. To become an event chair for the event, a person must raise $100,000, which entitles them to two tickets to a private dessert reception with the governor as well as 20 tickets to the reception and dinner.
According to Politico, Pawlenty "has been quietly assembling the blueprint of a presidential campaign and will announce Thursday the support of a group of high-level political strategists and donors, complemented by a handful of top new media consultants."
He has reportedly turned to many of the operatives behind the successful 2004 reelection campaign of former president George W. Bush.
Popular in Politics
- FBI: Surveillance info helped reveal subway, stock exchange bombings 152 Comments
- Jesse Jackson Jr. asks to serve jail sentence before wife
- Obama on NSA programs: Americans "not getting the complete story" 243 Comments
- Obama: "Very easy to slip-slide" into deeper Syrian involvement
- IRS scandal: Is partisanship overshadowing facts? 158 Comments
- Snowden: U.S. gov't destroyed my chance for fair trial 299 Comments
- Supreme Court strikes down Arizona voting law 875 Comments
- Former critic McCaskill pushes for Hillary Clinton 2016 bid














Would that include a woman's right to choose an abortion?
Pawlenty is a Repub, so would assume 'no'.
Would you really want him to run the country?
He wouldnt have even been elected if it wasn't for 3rd party candidates jumping into the election. In fact in the last governor election he trailed Mike Hatch and was going to lose until a day or two before the election when Hatch's running mate, Judy Dutcher had a brain freeze about E85. I don't see Pawlenty even carrying the state of Minnesota if he would be the GOP president candidate.
"Freedom First" is republican talk for protecting the interests of corporations and powerful special interests--it should be called "Corporations First."
A school child can see what the republican party is really all about. The average American citizen can expect nothing from them--they are doing their best to ruin this country.
by heresmy2cent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly! when they talk about "freedom" they mean the freedom of the rich and powerful to prey on everyone else. They in no way are talking about civil liberties, see George Bush's presidency for reference.
That party is doomed to irrelevance, for at least the next 20 years.
No Thanks.
-
Yeah? name one.
How about freedom to be able to CHOOSE your health insurance provider, or your doctor or elective surgeries, etc., etc.
How about the freedom to say "In God we trust"... no abolished in many schools.
How about the freedoms as outlined in the Constitution ! ! !
None of the health care proposals would limit ones choice of insurers... they all add more choices. In countries with single payer health care, like Canada, they can still CHOOSE to pay for whatever extra services they want. I have a friend who just did this because he wanted additional (optional) reinforcement for a hernia repair. He simply paid the difference in cost from what the government plan paid for. What is wrong with that? What?
The freedom to say 'in god we trust' has never been taken away. You just cannot FORCE people to say it. How is that less freedom? How? It is ridiculous to me that people consider it a loss of their own freedom when they are not allowed to tell other people what to do!
The freedom to own guns has not been threatened! You are just afraid that it may be.... Is that really the most important thing to worry about right now???