Gun-Toting Man Draws Scrutiny Outside Obama Town Hall
(AP Photo/Jim Cole)
New Hampshire state law is pretty clear about protecting its citizens' rights to carry firearms in public. Carrying a pistol or revolver openly is permitted without a license; carrying a concealed weapon requires a license from the state or local police.
William Kostric took advantage of that law on Tuesday to show up outside President Obama's Portsmouth, N.H. town hall meeting and hold a sign saying "It Is Time To Water The Tree Of Liberty." That invokes a phrase from a letter written by Thomas Jefferson: "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
Kostric did not immediately respond to an interview request from CBSNews.com.
Portsmouth police spokesman Lt. Frank Warchol told the Boston Globe that because Kostric was on private property -- it belongs to a church near the school with the town hall meeting -- he would not be arrested. "We can't do anything about it," Warchol said. "Obviously he's on our radar screen at this time."
Kostric was there around 11 a.m. ET, before Mr. Obama even left the White House en route for the Granite State, and there's no indication he ever laid eyes on the president. Nevertheless, around that time (11:35 a.m., to be precise) MSNBC's Carlos Watson called for Kostric to be forcibly disarmed: "I cannot imagine that there aren't enough lawyers in New Hampshire who can't file some sort of emergency injunction." One of his guests added: "Why can't we get rid of him now?"
MSNBC's Chris Matthews invited Kostric on his show and wondered why "you're carrying a goddamned gun at a presidential event?" (Kostric's reply: He was there peacefully, guns aren't unusual in New Hampshire, and Americans lose rights unless they exercise them.)
One MSNBC.com report indicates that Kostric was approached by a detective, possibly a Secret Service agent, who told him he could be arrested within 1,000 feet of a school with a weapon under a federal law.
Some background: the 1990 Gun-Free School Zones Act said that it "shall be unlawful" to possess a firearm within 1,000 feet of an elementary or secondary school.
That law is no longer on the books. In the case of U.S. v. Lopez, decided in 1995, the U.S. Supreme Court said violated Congress' powers to regulate interstate commerce and was therefore unconstitutional.
Congress re-enacted a version in 1996 with a narrower definition of interstate commerce; it says the statute does not apply "on private property not part of school grounds" or to anyone with a carry permit, with Kostric may or may not have.
It's reasonable to not understand the intricacies of gun laws; many vary from state to state, and few are written especially clearly.
But you'd hope that television commentators would take the time to learn at least a little before calling for measures such as court injunctions and disarming by police. One thing that MSNBC's hosts could have added is that a lawsuit filed last week in Washington, D.C. seeks to establish a broad Second Amendment right to carry firearms in public -- which, if successful, could mean that William Kostric's exercise in public handgun ownership will become much more commonplace.
Declan McCullagh is a correspondent for CBSNews.com. He can be reached at declan@cbsnews.com.
Popular in Politics
- Romney condemns "breach of trust" in Washington 190 Comments
- Officials on Benghazi: "We made mistakes, but without malice" 358 Comments
- IRS targeting overlooked biggest soft money groups 69 Comments
- For GOP, scandals could be an electoral plus - or minus 332 Comments
- Where is the Benghazi cover-up Republicans promised? 418 Comments
- Republicans use IRS scandal to tar Obamacare 45 Comments
- Ousted IRS chief: "I did not mislead" the American people
- Why Obama should worry that current scandals might impact 2016
It is the 1st amendment that protects their right to make such comments. Just as it was this gentleman's right to keep and bear arms.
It is vitally important to society that such rights be interpreted for the protection of the citizens from their government.
This applies universally. Not just when you like or dislike a persons actions or a particular right is inconvenient to the situation. Or you are a gun-hater (for no rational reason). Try criticizing a politician in china. See what happens. Try being a Jew in Nazi Germany. One of the first things Hitler did was outlaw private firearm ownership. We all know how that turned out.
The fact that he was near a political figure is totally irrelevant to the discussion. Obama's right as President to hold a town hall meeting is no more important than this man's right to bear arms. If the SS doesn't like this persons behavior, so long as it is not criminal, then they can move the President to a 'safer' or restricted location, not a publicly available place. The President is not above the law. Nor does it (nor should it) bend to his will when handy. Ask Nixon.
Also, why does every gun-hating liberal assume automatically that someone carrying a firearm is going to shoot someone? Do the police go around randomly shooting people? Not generally. They all carry guns. Why would a private citizen be any more or less dangerous? And before anyone says 'police are trained'. You can shove it. Many officers don't handle their service weapon other than for qualifications. So the proficiency is probably equivalent. And under stress that point is moot anyway.
Liberal emotion falls apart under rational thought, historical perspective and historical facts.
As for the guy with the gun, he never fired a shot, never un-holstered his weapon, had a permit, had permission to be on the property. He was perfectly legal in all his actions!!! He went there to protest Obama's actions, which have not been that legal!! Where does it say he can seize banks, and privately owned businesses??? Where were the warrents mandated by the constitution? Where was the probable cause of a crime?
ABSOLUTELY NONE existed!!! If anyone should have been the president, for theft!!!
This country is supposed to run on the ballot not the bullet but after President Obama won by such a large margin it seems those in the small group who did not want him to win are willing to flirt with the former.