July 29, 2009 9:23 AM

Politics Today: Senators Near Health Care Deal

By
Steve Chaggaris
Topics
Politics Today
Politics Today is CBSNews.com's inside look at the key stories driving the day in politics, written by CBS News Political Director Steve Chaggaris:

**Senate negotiators close to a deal on health care...

**President Obama hits the road to sell health reform; will lay out list of "consumer protections"...

5058008HEALTH CARE: "An emerging consensus among a bipartisan group of senators is poised to shift the dynamic in the congressional debate over health-care reform and could lead to a final product that sheds many of the priorities that President Obama has emphasized and that have drawn GOP attacks," report the Washington Post's Shailagh Murray and Paul Kane.

"Three Democrats and three Republicans on the Senate Finance Committee are expected to wrap up their arduous multi-week talks in the coming days, and Majority Leader Harry M. Reid (D-Nev.) said he expects a panel vote before the Senate recess, which will begin Aug. 7.

"Assuming the fragile committee coalition holds, the legislation it produces would scramble the reform landscape by introducing policy ideas that have their origins in the political center. The bill is bound to disappoint liberals. But with prominent GOP backing, it also could prove more difficult for Republicans to reject out of hand -- the approach they have taken to the House bill and a second Senate version, written by the health committee."

"Democratic Senator Max Baucus, leading the talks among six Democrats and Republicans on the finance committee, said they made progress and will meet again today," add Bloomberg News' Laura Litvan and Catherine Dodge.

"'We reached an agreement on a couple of very key points,' Baucus told reporters after meeting with the other senators. The Montana lawmaker earlier said the Senate plan will likely include a provision taking away from Congress the authority to set pay rates for Medicare, the U.S. program for the elderly, and give it to a federal commission less subject to political pressure. And it would probably ban insurers from refusing to cover people with pre-existing medical conditions."

(AP Photo/Haraz N. Ghanbari)
One sticking point: a public option. "Liberals who see the effort to overhaul health care as a once-in-a-generation opportunity are growing anxious that a final deal -- and a Democratic president they backed -- will negotiate away their top priority: a public plan to compete with private insurers," report the Wall Street Journal's Laura Meckler and Naftali Bendavid.

"Some Democrats are threatening to oppose any bill that excludes this option, and sympathetic outside groups are pressuring wavering lawmakers. ...

"In the Senate Finance Committee, leaders could announce a bipartisan agreement in the coming days that includes an alternative to the public plan. Key senators have agreed to rely on nonprofit cooperatives, not the government, to provide competition to private insurance companies.

"The liberal anxiety also is fueled by the White House, which has sent mixed messages. Asked Tuesday about the likelihood that the Senate Finance Committee bill will lack a vigorous public plan, White House press secretary Robert Gibbs declined to pass judgment. 'I think the broader principle is that, do we have a mechanism that provides adequate choice and competition,' he said."

"The House legislation has divided Democrats in that chamber along similar lines and is built around a public option to be paid for by raising taxes on the wealthy, an idea that has almost no chance of winning GOP votes," write The Hill's Alexander Bolton and Jeffrey Young.

"The Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) Committee this month voted along partisan lines to approve legislation with a public option at its core. Infighting among House Democrats has led to an impasse at the Energy and Commerce Committee that is expected to prevent House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) from meeting her deadline of completing work before the August recess."

Gallup Poll, "Benefits of Healthcare Reform a Tough Sell for Americans"

Politico's Carrie Budoff Brown and Patrick O'Connor, "Democrats scramble for pre-recess progress"

New York Times' David Leonhardt, "Health Care Reform and the Unpopular T-Word"

Los Angeles Times' Noam N. Levey and Janet Hook, "The centrist alternative on healthcare: Cooperatives"

Wall Street Journal's Greg Hitt and Naftali Bendavid, "Plan to Tax Insurers Stirs Interest in House"

Associated Press' David Espo and Erica Werner, "Bipartisan group eyes Medicare savings"

Las Vegas Sun's Lisa Mascaro, "Reid's secrecy on health care reform provokes frustration, admiration"

(AP)
PRESIDENT OBAMA TODAY: President Obama hits the road today for two town meeting-style events to sell his health care plan. First, he travels to Raleigh, N.C. for a noon ET event, then he visits a Kroger Supermarket in Bristol, Va., at 4:15 p.m. ET for his second town meeting event.

A White House official tells CBS News, "the President will lay out for Americans why health insurance reform means more security and stability for them and their families. Building on the theme that he outlined at the start of last week's press conference, the President will make it clear that when he signs a reform bill into law, the discrimination, dropping, and coverage gaps that riddle today's health insurance system will be a thing of the past.

"At stops in Raleigh and Bristol he'll outline eight specific consumer protections: no discrimination for pre-existing conditions, no exorbitant out-of-pocket expenses, no cost-sharing for preventive care, no dropping of coverage for serious illness, no gender discrimination, no annual or lifetime caps, extended coverage for young adults, and guaranteed insurance renewal. As the day goes on, the White House will spread the word via email and social networking sites: if you already have health insurance, reform means more security and stability."

"The president's speech in Raleigh this morning is his first visit to the state since his election victory in November, when he became the first Democrat since 1964 to win North Carolina," writes the Winston-Salem Journal's James Romoser.

"Now, as he tries to achieve an overhaul of the nation's health-care system, he needs the support of the moderate wing of his party, which has concerns about the overall cost of the plan and the wisdom of including a government-sponsored insurance option that would compete with private insurers.

"In recent weeks, North Carolina has become a battleground in the fight over health care. Interest groups are running TV commercials. Activists on both sides of the issue are organizing rallies and petition drives. And members of the state's legislative delegation are watching closely."

(AP)
"When President Barack Obama comes to Raleigh today, he will visit a state heavily invested in the health-care debate and spending millions to shape its outcome," reports the Raleigh News & Observer's Barbara Barrett.

"The pharmaceutical industry, working to fight off new generic competitors and Canadian imports, employs 118,000 people in North Carolina. Medical schools churn out doctors torn between careers as specialists or taking the less lucrative but sorely needed path of primary care. And major corporations such as Lowe's Home Improvement are trying to figure out how to cover their employees' medical needs.

"In all, North Carolina companies and agencies with an interest in shaping the bills that may reform the nation's health-care system have spent $4.8 million this year in Washington lobbying -- a jump of nearly 40 percent over this time a year ago, according to an analysis by The News & Observer and The Charlotte Observer."

Meantime, in Bristol, Va., Mr. Obama should encounter a friendly audience.

The Roanoke Times' Sarah Bruyn Jones writes, "Kroger workers were busy Tuesday setting up a stage in the produce section near the deli, Kroger spokesman Carl York said. 'We're just thrilled,' he said, adding that it is unusual for Kroger to close its doors. Typically the store is open every day of the year but Christmas.

"A few elected officials, including the mayor of Bristol, were invited, but the majority of the crowd will be the approximately 100 employees who work at the store.

"Kroger employees are all members of the United Food and Commercial Workers International Union, which has been vocal in its support for Obama's health care reform efforts."

Associated Press' Charles Babington, "Obama facing tough choice on health care"

Chicago Tribune's Mike Dorning, "Obama's doc slams health-care reform plans"

Washington Post's Ceci Connolly, "President Gets Personal At Forum on Health Care"


HENRY LOUIS GATES ARREST

Boston Herald's Marie Szaniszlo, "Diplomacy on tap for Henry Louis Gates Jr., Sgt. James Crowley"

CBSNews.com's Kevin Hechtkopf, "Powell Says He Has Been Racially Profiled"

Associated Press' Ben Feller, "Beer diplomacy: Obama aims for calm and comity"

CBS News' Early Show anchor Harry Smith on Huffington Post, "Just a Minute: Beer Profiling"

Boston Globe's Jack Nicas, "Will Obama tap Bay State for beer?"

FOREIGN POLICY

LA Times' Jim Puzzanghera and David Pierson, "U.S., China end talks with smiles but no progress on climate change"

Wall Street Journal's Tom Barkley and Deborah Solomon, "Chinese Convey Concern on Growing U.S. Debt"

Associated Press' Foster Klug, "US-China talks more about future than the present"

Wall Street Journal's Yochi J. Dreazen, "U.S.-Iraq Relations Enter a New Phase, Gates Says"

ECONOMY/STIMULUS/BUDGET

Wall Street Journal's Jonathan Weisman, "In a Savings Shocker, the Government Discovers That Paper Has Two Sides"

Associated Press' Mary Claire Dale and Devlin Barrett, "Police aid a 'blessing' - for those who get it"

Politico's Jonathan Martin, "DNC targets Republican leaders on the stimulus"

SOTOMAYOR

LA Times' David G. Savage and Richard Simon, "Republicans send message with opposition to Sotomayor"

Wall Street Journal's Jess Bravin, "Sotomayor Moves Closer to High Court"

WALL STREET

NY Times' Stephen Labaton, "House Panel Approves Restraints on Executive Pay"

OBAMA ADMINISTRATION

NY Times' William Glaberson, "Obama Faces Court Test Over Detainee"

Associated Press' Derrik J. Lang, "Obama appears on comedian George Lopez's talk show"

OBAMA'S BIRTH CERTIFICATE

Honolulu Advertiser's Dan Nakaso, "Hawaii officials confirm Obama's original birth certificate still exists"

LA Times' Mark Silva, "White House, Hawaii again try to deal with questions about Obama's birth"

FUTURE RACES

The Hill's Reid Wilson, "Open seats bring parties heartburn"

Politico's Charles Mahtesian and Josh Kraushaar, "Backlash: Democratic dangers mount"

2009 VA Governor: Washington Post's Amy Gardner and Rosalind S. Helderman, "As Candidates Ponder Taxes and Traffic, Specifics of Road Proposals Remain Elusive"

2009 NYC Mayor: NY Times' David W. Chen, "Insurgent Candidate Fights Bloomberg"

2009 NYC Mayor: Associated Press, "Colin Powell endorses NYC mayor's re-election bid"

2010 MA Governor: Boston Globe's Martin Finucane, "Baker depicts himself as turnaround artist"

2010 CA Senate: Washington Examiner's Michael Barone, "A close Senate race in California?"

2010 CT Senate: CQ Politics' Emily Cadei, "Dodd: 'Clear Conscience' As 2010 Foes Close In"

2010 CT Senate: Washington Times' S.A. Miller, "Dodd, Conrad: Mortgage discounts were 'courtesy'"

2010 IL Senate: Peoria Journal Star's Karen McDonald, "Giannoulias stresses ethics, integrity"

2010 KY Senate: Lexington Herald-Leader's Jack Brammer, "Some conservatives wary of Grayson"

2010 NC Senate: CQ Politics' Emily Cadei, "McIntyre Out of North Carolina Senate Race"

2010 PA Senate: Daily Local News' Alex Rose, "Sestak won't run for 3rd term in House"

Add a Comment See all 29 Comments
by hungry1968-16 July 29, 2009 11:57 AM EDT
by endurorob July 29, 2009 11:48 AM EDT

I am retire military not disabled. I do not use the VA I use CHAMPUS Prime and my current providor is Aetna. My health care is not government provided it is government subsidized. I pay a yearly premium and a small copay so it is not a free ride.







Oh right - now I get it.

YOUR health care is government subsidized, so you're a true blue patriot.

But if someone else's health care is government subsidized, they're scummbag, free loading, system leeching, moochers. That's your position?

By the way, how much do your premiums and co-pays cost? Is it $12,000 a year like the poor and middle classes are expected to pay?

Also, millions of retirees around the country are losing their health care benefits due to their former employers filing bankruptcy. Since America is going bankrupt due to health care, shouldn't you also lose YOUR medical benefits?
Reply to this comment
by endurorob July 29, 2009 11:48 AM EDT
hungry1968-16 July 29, 2009 11:44 AM EDT


Your VA health care.

Don't think for a minute that when the health care funding implosion finally hits the federal coffers, that the VA medical system is going to be the ONLY government agency to be exempted from massive budget cuts.

Your co-pays are going to soar, many facilities are going to be closed, many doctors and nurses will be let go, and many services and programs will be cut.

And have fun driving 4 - 5 hours to go see the nearest "specialist", in the nearest big city VA hospital, and then waiting for HOURS in that crowded waiting room with all of the other vets within a 200 mile radius of that hospital.



I am retire military not disabled. I do not use the VA I use CHAMPUS Prime and my current providor is Aetna. My health care is not government provided it is government subsidized. I pay a yearly premium and a small copay so it is not a free ride.
Reply to this comment
by hungry1968-16 July 29, 2009 11:44 AM EDT
by endurorob July 29, 2009 11:38 AM EDT

No, this is an attempt by the dems to push their socialist agenda. What free ride are you talking about?






Your VA health care.

Don't think for a minute that when the health care funding implosion finally hits the federal coffers, that the VA medical system is going to be the ONLY government agency to be exempted from massive budget cuts.

Your co-pays are going to soar, many facilities are going to be closed, many doctors and nurses will be let go, and many services and programs will be cut.

And have fun driving 4 - 5 hours to go see the nearest "specialist", in the nearest big city VA hospital, and then waiting for HOURS in that crowded waiting room with all of the other vets within a 200 mile radius of that hospital.
Reply to this comment
by endurorob July 29, 2009 11:38 AM EDT
hungry1968-16 July 29, 2009 11:32 AM EDT


This is an attempt by the democrats to try and kill the impending health care meltdown, which is bankrupting thousands of businesses and more importantly - the federal government.

Try taking your blinders off for ONE minute, and quit thinking that the whole system is designed to help "free loaders".

Don't forget that if the government can't afford to provide health care anymore, your free ride is coming to a screeching halt as well.



No, this is an attempt by the dems to push their socialist agenda. What free ride are you talking about?
Reply to this comment
by hungry1968-16 July 29, 2009 11:32 AM EDT
by endurorob July 29, 2009 11:11 AM EDT

You claim the repubs are bought off by the medical industry but choose to ignore that this is just another attempt by the far left dems to buy the votes of certain demographic groups.







This is an attempt by the democrats to try and kill the impending health care meltdown, which is bankrupting thousands of businesses and more importantly - the federal government.

Try taking your blinders off for ONE minute, and quit thinking that the whole system is designed to help "free loaders".

Don't forget that if the government can't afford to provide health care anymore, your free ride is coming to a screeching halt as well.
Reply to this comment
by endurorob July 29, 2009 11:30 AM EDT
leeanna59 July 29, 2009 11:18 AM EDT
There is an old adage, "If it aint broke, don't fix it." Currently, the U.S. has the best health care in the world. People come here for medical treatment. Why do we want to change that and make our medical treatment on par with socialized medicine in countries like Canada and Great Britian?


The problem is that people assume that certain negative health statistics are due to our health care system. They ignore the fact that Americans have the worst health habits in the world. We overeat, over indulge in alcahol, have a serious drug problem, we don't follow the advice of medical professionals. All these and many more things contribute to our generally poor health. Blaming the health care system for us exercizing our freedom to make these individual choices is irresponsible.
Reply to this comment
by endurorob July 29, 2009 11:25 AM EDT
pubsrtoast July 29, 2009 11:21 AM EDT
Do you have pictures of Sotomayor at a Klan rally? I guess I must have missed those. The fact remains that she was extremely qualified and her judicial rulings were generally centerist.



You live under the ignorant assumption that someone needs to be white and in the klan to be a racist. Her own words mark her as a racist.
Reply to this comment
by endurorob July 29, 2009 11:23 AM EDT
pubsrtoast July 29, 2009 11:17 AM EDT
The point was genius that nobody can really be sure what the final draft of a bill will say until it goes through the congressional process and is signed into law. Do you honestly believe the AARP would endorse or even standby while such a provision is passed? I suggest the GOP work out some sort of color coded public plan alert system similar to their terror alert system, it might be more efficient at scaring the bejesus out of the elderly.



So how well does it work opening your parachute after you hit the ground?
Reply to this comment
by endurorob July 29, 2009 11:11 AM EDT
chonder2 July 29, 2009 11:07 AM EDT

Enduro-The Dems you mentioned have morphed into the Repub ZONE! No...no...no...no, click,click, "deposit 100 thousand dollars please"...CHA-CHING,no...no...no...no. You have to admit it, we have the best Reps money can buy!!



You claim the repubs are bought off by the medical industry but choose to ignore that this is just another attempt by the far left dems to buy the votes of certain demographic groups.
Reply to this comment
by endurorob July 29, 2009 11:08 AM EDT
pubsrtoast July 29, 2009 10:59 AM EDT
You know, I find it interesting that everyone knows every last detail of a bill that hasn't even made it out of committee yet much less been voted on and signed into law. Why don't we wait for the actual bill to be passed before we start believing and spreading the political rhetoric that somehow passes as informed debate in this country.



Good plan there skippy. Wait until the bill is passed and becomes law before we discuss it's major flaws? How well does your horse do pushing that cart?
Reply to this comment
by pubsrtoast July 29, 2009 11:17 AM EDT
The point was genius that nobody can really be sure what the final draft of a bill will say until it goes through the congressional process and is signed into law. Do you honestly believe the AARP would endorse or even standby while such a provision is passed? I suggest the GOP work out some sort of color coded public plan alert system similar to their terror alert system, it might be more efficient at scaring the bejesus out of the elderly.
See all 29 Comments
.

Follow Political Hotsheet

Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook