June 7, 2009 11:52 AM

Gingrich Opts To "Reframe" Racist Tweet

By
Michelle Levi
Topics
In The News
When Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich blasted President Obama's Supreme Court nominee Judge Sonia Sotomayor for being a racist on Twitter, he ignited a debate over her objectivity.

On May 27 Gingrich published Twitter comments on a 2001 speech by Sotomayor in which she said "I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn't lived that life." She also acknowledged that "there can never be a universal definition of 'wise.'"

Gingrich likened her speech to a white male saying his experience would make him a better judge than a Latina. "New racism is no better than old racism," he wrote. "White man racist nominee would be forced to withdraw. Latina woman racist should also withdraw."

Speaking to Face the Nation guest moderator Harry Smith Sunday, senior White House advisor David Axelrod defended Sotomayor against charges that she is a racist.

"I think what she believes, Harry, is that everyone is the product of their experiences. She's the product of hers."

Axelrod called Gingrich's comment "unfortunate" and said, "I think that it is so unfair and so unreflective of who she is."

Later in the program, Gingrich said he wished to "reframe" his initial comment calling Sotomayor a racist, when really he does not know the nominee and meant that her words were racist.

"One of the challenges for the administration is having first chided me for language, then having said she didn't mean it, and then having said she ought to restate it. Now they face the fact that she has said this, written about it four or five time," he argued.

"If you say people of this ethnic background are superior to people of this ethnic background, take out her language and put in the word 'white,' put in 'white male' where she had 'Latina,' that person would be disqualified from the court. Also would be disqualified as a juror."

Gingrich admitted that it is "very doubtful" that her comments would disqualify her as a high court pick. "I think she was a good prosecutor. I think she was an acceptable district court judge," he said.

But, Gingrich added, lower level judges "aren't in a position to live out whatever their prejudices are because they're bound by the Supreme Court," arguing that a lifetime appointment would put her in a position to radicalize the Court.


More from Face The Nation (6.07.09):
  • Concerns About Detainees Becoming Marytrs
  • Gingrich Responds To Powell-Cheney Debate
  • Read The Complete Transcript> (pdf)

    To watch Newt Gingrich click on the video player below.


  • Add a Comment See all 65 Comments
    by polisigh June 8, 2009 7:37 PM EDT
    Newt and Republicans: they think Palin was qualified to be president but that an accomplished scholar and respected juror is not qualified to be a Supreme Court Justice. I bet they are still regretting the process that finally allowed all minorities the vote. How they miss the days of rich white men rule all.
    Reply to this comment
    by revlin1 June 8, 2009 12:22 PM EDT
    Matter of fact; I heard a judge not long ago ask a mostly White courtroom full of potential jurors if they could "be objective" while judging a charged child molestor who was native American ...and of course; JOURNALISTS were in the room to keep track of the fairness of it all. NEWSFLASH: He was guilty on all accounts with a 4 yr old girl....too ugly to print here on the charges...NEWS didn't print too much after the verdict however. Journalists were more worried about the objectivity in racial issues than they were in JUSTICE BEING SERVED for the little girl and her family! What kind of world do we live in?
    Reply to this comment
    by revlin1 June 8, 2009 12:19 PM EDT
    Hey Newt: It is what it is...DON'T APOLOGIZE and DON'T BACK DOWN. It's time to turn the tables back around for good. That old RACE CARD came into play when Obama came on the scene last year. YOU WERE RIGHT in your assessment.
    Reply to this comment
    by fred-mertz June 8, 2009 9:35 AM EDT
    Clarification for those with limited attention spans:
    ---

    The dead-enders here are STILL calling judge Sotomayor a "racist"?

    See how effective the repuke tactics are? Gingrich tells an outrageous lie, calling a REPUBLICAN APPOINTED AND APPROVED judge a "racist" because a Democratic President has now nominated her for the supreme court. Gingrich "supports" his lie by taking something Sotomayor said BEFORE the Republicans appointed and approved her OUT OF CONTEXT, and he deliberately misconstrues what she said to make it appear vaguely "racist". The dittoheads who now make up the base of the GOP all believe Gingrich's lies, and they vociferously repeat it ad nauseum everywhere on the internet. When Gingrigh "reframes" his outrageously false statement, trying to pretend he never really meant what he said, THE MORONS STILL HANG ON TO TO THE LIE, refusing to change. They can't change because all they have left in their tiny, little, miserable existences is BLIND HATRED of anything from the "left", or from "liberals", or from the duly elected President of the United States of America who 70% or more of the country SUPPORTS.

    Face it, morons: the GOP is toast. You are hopelessly mired in denial of your own failure. You are total dead-enders!
    Reply to this comment
    by fred-mertz June 8, 2009 9:27 AM EDT
    The dead-enders here are STILL calling judge Sotomayor a "racist"?

    See how effective the repuke tactics are? Gingrich tells an outrageous lie, calling a REPUBLICAN APPOINTED AND APPROVED judge a "racist" because a Democratic President has now nominated her for the supreme court, by taking something she said BEFORE they appointed and approved her OUT OF CONTEXT and deliberately misconstruing what she said to make it appear vaguely "racist", and the dittoheads who now make up the base of the GOP all believe it, and vociferously repeat it ad nauseum everywhere on the internet. And then when Gingrigh "reframes" his outrageously false statement, trying to pretend he never really meant what he said, THE MORONS STILL HANG ON TO TO THE LIE, refusing to change, because all they have left in their tiny, little, miserable existences is BLIND HATRED of anything from the "left", or from "liberals", or from the duly elected President of the United States of America who 70% or more of the country SUPPORTS.

    Face it, morons: the GOP is toast. You are hopelessly mired in denial of your own failure. You are total dead-enders!
    Reply to this comment
    by stgenesius June 8, 2009 9:15 AM EDT
    Yeah, that makes sense Newt, because Scalia and Thomas NEVER show any prejudice. Wow.
    Reply to this comment
    by briannorwood June 8, 2009 9:00 AM EDT
    Question is, who gives a rats patoot what Newt Gingrich has to say. Remember, this guy was censured by the House of Representatives for ethics violations before he was forced by his own party to resign.

    I thought we were rid of this crook years ago. If the GOP needs to resurrect this nutcase to lead their party, they are in worse shape than they think!
    Reply to this comment
    by chitown639 June 8, 2009 8:59 AM EDT
    Poor Justice Souter...all he did was ask this FOOL to hand over his birth certificate in a Write of Certioraria...of course now Dumbama is pixxed because he has to spend so much more money to hide it.

    And it did give him an excuse to put a racist and a bigot on the SCOTUS bench.
    Posted by IThoughtItWasFunnyAgain

    It's a pity that the election of President Obama has transformed your miserable life into a endless obsession of clinging to bizarre rumors and crazy outright lies to justify your hatred of our president. Your simple-minded comments are meant only to appeal to the naive, the ignorant and the uninformed, who are desperately grasping for straws everyday on why exactly they suddenly hate the government and the president, other than the fact that the president is black...LMAO!!!

    You're a FOOL, as your comments are evidence of such.
    Reply to this comment
    by woodjd42 June 8, 2009 6:39 AM EDT
    her stantement was racist. but the Dems love a good racist statement as long as its against white men.

    Equal is equal
    Posted by jedi0849 '

    If equal is equal, then why aren't you talking about judge Aleto's comments before his confirmation?
    Reply to this comment
    by ramos1129 June 8, 2009 4:12 AM EDT
    And there are people that pay this guy for political advice?
    Reply to this comment
    See all 65 Comments
    .

    Follow Political Hotsheet

    Scroll Left
    Scroll Right More »
    CBS News on Facebook