Drug Czar Doesn't Like Phrase "War On Drugs"

(AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)
In an interview with The Wall Street Journal, Kerlikowske said the United States drug policy needs to shift the emphasis from incarceration to treatment.
"Regardless of how you try to explain to people it's a 'war on drugs' or a 'war on a product,' people see a war as a war on them," Kerlikowske told the Journal. "We're not at war with people in this country."
Kerlikowske did not offer up an alternative phrase, though if previous nomenclatural adjustments by the Obama team are any indication, any new phraseology may lack the same punch. Merits aside, it's fair to say that "Overseas Contingency Operation," the administration's re-branding of the "War On Terror," doesn't have quite the same ring as the more hawkish term did.
Though Kerlikowske's statements to the Journal are particularly blunt, the Obama administration has already made moves to reorient the country's response to the drug trade and addiction. In March, Attorney General Eric Holder said that federal agents would only target medical marijuana dispensaries when they violated state and federal law. Under the Bush administration, medical marijuana distributors were targeted even if they complied with state laws.
Last week, the administration joined a federal judge in urging Congress to equalize punishments for crack dealers and users with those for dealers and users of powdered cocaine. The administration argued that this disparity in sentencing was unfair to African American communities, where crack-cocaine has historically been more prevalent.
In tapping Kerlikowske for the cabinet-level position, President Obama selected a law enforcement veteran who is no stranger to unorthodox methods of policing drugs. As Seattle's police chief, Kerlikowske permitted medical marijuana distributors to operate their businesses so long as they confined them to a few block radius in the city's business distract.
Popular in Politics
- Michelle Obama decries "slander" that educated blacks are "trying to act white" Play Video
- Adviser on White House scandals: "Partisan fishing expeditions" won't distract Obama 172 Comments
- Benghazi-disciplined diplomat a prolific poet
- Romney condemns "breach of trust" in Washington
- Obama: Racism is no excuse for not excelling Play Video
- Republicans continue beating Benghazi drum 110 Comments
- Officials on Benghazi: "We made mistakes, but without malice"
- Obama to discuss legality of drone program














The real opportunity would be to develop new and more sophisticated delivery systems for this plant's extracts. Some ideas include:
1) Inhalers (like for asthma); 2) trans-dermal patches; 3) liquid-gel capsules; 4) oral sprays (like breath or 'energy' sprays); 5) extracts boiled in oil (as the Israeli's use for their soldiers suffering from suicidal PTSD) ; 5) or refined by more sophisticated processes into other ingestible substances - even eye-drops !!
So long as the FDA, AMA, and DEA insist smoking anything is bad, the primitive, crude, but most widely used delivery system to date, namely, smoked and inhaled, remains the patient's only remedy.
(Note: Synthetic 'Marinol' costs about $300. for a month's supply; and it would be far cheaper to just extract the essential oils from the dried herbal plant).
Federal laws currently offers a 20 years sentence for extracting essential oil from the dried cannabis plant.
Get smart people. Let's put this in the hands of real doctors and researchers. Let's demand basic studies to determine basic things. Let's implement the whole program through pharmacies and 'dispensaries' like the models in California, with unintimidated doctors overseeing the research.
The real 'opportunity' here is to help people who suffer from disease. Plain and simple. Find new and better ways to ingest it, and study it in a clinically structured program - so the patients can get the most benefit from the new laws in 13 (and soon 19) states with medical cannabis exemptions.
Make it easy for Obama and his crew. Approach the whole thing from a scientific research angle. That way, he can keep creating "commissions to determine and study", and follow up studies, and more studies after that. Don't force his hand into making too great a leap, especially after all these years of 'reefer maddness' and harsh penalties.
Let real doctors and real patients decide what's best for us.
Posted by endrepubs at 5:38 PM : May 15, 2009
3 decades? That's all? Perhaps we should be prepared for a long term commitment. After all, it took the Vietnamese at least 60 years to kick everybody out of their country. That's one of the things about the US ya gotta love. Whether it's in politics, love, or international relations a "long term commitment" translates to mean "I want to see results by the middle of next week" :))
Posted by dwilson59
As opposed to people who daily use, Ritalin, Zoloft, Celexa, Prozac, Paxil, Lexapro, Luvox, Pristiq, Cymbalta, Ixel, Effexor, Tolvon, Zispin, Remeron, Avanza, Strattera, Mazanor, Edronax, Vivalan, Wellbutrin, Elavil, Anatranil, Adapin, Sinequan, Tofranil, Surmontil, Norpramin, Pamelor, Aventyl, Elepryl, Parnate, Emsam, Nardul, Aurorix, Manerix, Marplan, Buspar, Ariza, Serzone, Sedeil, Desyrel....and these are just the anti depressants. Face it...we have an entire country of drug addicts, legal addicts of drugs that make marijuana look like heroin
Posted by nojoy01"
Really? I tell you what...you decriminalize and regulate, and you eliminate their power. Think! Think! Think! Look at reasonable expectations of our actions...do you really think trafficers can be eliminated? Tell me...have they in the entire history of mankind? Nope? Then maybe you should rethink it a bit.
STOP pretending like we are idiots and you can confuse us with your rhetoric Mr Govt man...the only ones you are fooling are the sheep on the right, and they still think there are WMDs in Iraq. It doesn't take much really for them