Decision On Polar Bears Infuriates Environmental Groups
(AP)
In a move that has infuriated environmental groups, the interior secretary announced today that he will uphold the Bush administration's decision to limit restrictions on greenhouse gas emissions that imperil Artic polar bears.
Environmental groups said that they had hoped that the Obama administration would overturn the rule, which currently only restricts the burning of fossil fuels within the bears' natural habitat. These groups point out that failure to more broadly regulate carbon dioxide, even those emissions released thousands of miles from the Arctic, cripples larger efforts to address the effects of global warming. Studies show that the melting of Arctic sea ice threatens the polar bears. A spokesperson for Greenpeace said that the bears will be extinct by 2050 if stricter rules are not embraced.
"Today's announcement shows a clear willingness to compromise when it comes to global warming science and policy." said Melanie Duchin, a global warming campaigner for Greenpeace based in Anchorage, Alaska. "I expected more from the Obama administration."
Earlier this year, Salazar angered many of the same environmental groups by endorsing another holdover from the Bush administration – a decision to remove gray wolves living in the Rockies and western Great Lakes from the list of threatened and endangered species. In a statement today, the secretary expressed sympathy for the plight of the polar bears, while justifying his decision not to extend Endangered Species Act protections to the iconic bear.
"We must do all we can to help the polar bear recover, recognizing that the greatest threat to the polar bear is the melting of Arctic sea ice caused by climate change," Salazar said in a statement. "However, the Endangered Species Act is not the proper mechanism for controlling our nation's carbon emissions. Instead, we need a comprehensive energy and climate strategy that curbs climate change and its impacts – including the loss of sea ice. Both President Obama and I are committed to achieving that goal."
Salazar said that trying to determine how much carbon emissions by a coal burning plant in Pennsylvania is hurting bear populations is impractical. He called for a more comprehensive strategy to reduce global warming.
Greenpeace and the Center for Biological Diversity delivered almost 150,000 petitions calling on Salazar to eliminate the polar bear rule. They did not mince words in denouncing the Obama administration's decision.
"We need the change that Obama promised, not more Friday announcements from the interior department that they're going to sacrifice the polar bear and the environment to polluters," said Kassie Siegel, a spokesperson for the Center for Biological Diversity. "This is incredibly disappointing for the Obama administration to adopt Bush's polar bear extinction program as its own. Salazar's announcement is the worst kind of doublespeak."
Popular in Politics
- For GOP, scandals could be an electoral plus - or minus 308 Comments
- IRS targeting overlooked biggest soft money groups
- Officials on Benghazi: "We made mistakes, but without malice" 320 Comments
- Republicans use IRS scandal to tar Obamacare
- Where is the Benghazi cover-up Republicans promised? 403 Comments
- Ousted IRS chief: "I did not mislead" the American people 261 Comments
- Romney condemns "breach of trust" in Washington
- Why Obama should worry that current scandals might impact 2016 240 Comments
Posted by billyarber at 2:46 PM : May 8, 2009
Please provide a reference for the numbers you quote.
Posted by condilla at 9:00 PM : May 8, 2009
No one is saying that CO2 is "poisoning people". That is not and never has been the issue.
Too much CO2 in the atmosphere causes warming of the planet's surface and lower atmosphere by trapping infrared radiation emitted by the surface. This is called the Greenhouse Effect. It has already occurred on Venus.
I don't think anyone who voted for him thought him any more than a mere man, subject to error.
Still, that was a substantial improvement over an arrogant man who could do little more than make errors.
It was you dittohead slack-jaws who stuck the "savior" label on him.
Did you know that an organization in Cave Junction, Oregon, the Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine, has a statement signed by 15,000 experts that say there is no consensus in the scientific community that there is a link between humans and so-called climate change?
OISM is run by Arthur B. Robinson.
Don't let the fact non of the five scientists at OISM is a climatologist. Never mind that an article circulated with Robinson's petition (The "Oregon Petition") was printed in the same typeface and format as the official Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, but the NAS was surprised to find that they had never printed any such thing. Never mind that the accompanying editorial from the Wall Street Journal "Science Has Spoken: Global Warming Is a Myth" was written by Robinson's two sons. Never mind that Robinson's article was not published at all until it eventually found its way into the journal published by the "Association of American Physicians and Surgeons", which is produced by Jane Orient, who happens to be one of the scientists at OISM.
That's all just liberal fakery to try to put down the man's good work!
I don't know about you, but the fact that Dr. Seymour Butts and Dr. I P Freely signed that petition reassures me!
Hate to say it, but Obama is screwing the pooch on this one.
No conspiracy, just sacrifice. From the fundraisers, and the members.