May 7, 2009 5:06 PM

Will Congress' "Cash-For-Clunkers" Plan Work?

By
Stephanie Condon
Topics
Domestic Issues
(CBS/iStockphoto)


Democrats say they have made significant progress overcoming conflicting interests to advance climate change legislation in the House of Representatives, but one recent compromise could amount to simply another significant auto industry subsidy, some economists say.

Pressure is mounting for House Energy and Commerce Chair Henry Waxman (D-Calif.) to bring the legislation to the House floor by Memorial Day, as he promised. The committee could vote on the bill next week.

However, the cap-and-trade legislation in development has environmentalists who support reducing carbon emissions at odds with business-minded Democrats and Republicans, who say putting a price on carbon will hurt the economy.

Rep. Jay Inslee (D-Wash.), a strong proponent of the bill, told reporters Thursday that major progress has been made over the last 24 hours. After meeting with the New Democrat Coalition, a centrist group that focuses on issues like national security and economic growth, Inslee said the coalition will sign a resolution urging the passage of climate change legislation this year.

"This is a very complex bill," said Inslee, chair of the sustainable energy and environment coalition. "There will be issues about this bill until the signing ceremony on the South Lawn."

Waxman has worked hard, though, "to accommodate members' concerns that are unique to their districts," Inslee said. For important committee members like former chair John Dingell (D-Mich.) and Rep. Bart Stupak (D-Mich.), that means helping the auto industry.

After meeting with the White House earlier this week, the House reached an agreement on a bill provision called "cash-for-clunkers." The program would allow consumers to trade in their old cars for a voucher of up to $4,500 when buying a new, more fuel-efficient vehicle.

"Cash-for-clunkers is a common sense proposal that will help provide a shot in the arm for the American auto industry at a crucial time for our economy, reduce the emissions that cause climate change, and make Americans more energy independent," Majority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said in a statement after the agreement was reached.

Under the plan the House agreed upon, consumers would get a $4,500 voucher for purchasing a passenger vehicle with mileage at least 10 miles per gallon higher than their old car, or a $3,500 voucher for a new car with mileage at least 4 mpg higher. The new car must have a minimum fuel efficiency rating of at least 22 mpg. Consumers could also get vouchers for buying new trucks or SUVs that meet similar but less stringent mileage standards.

The House agreement stipulates the program will fund up to a million vouchers over the course of a year, which would cost between $3.5 billion and $4.5 billion.

But the cash-for-clunkers program may not necessarily increase car purchases, instead just shifting when purchases are made.

"To some extent, this is just getting people to accelerate their car purchases," said Professor Daniel Sperling, director of the Institute of Transportation Studies at the University of California at Davis, and acting director of the university's Energy Efficiency Center. "The auto industry is in such bad shape right now, they desperately need to move the metal right now."

And while some skeptical economists agree that the program is likely to spur immediate car purchases, they say it will do little to contribute to the reduction of carbon emissions. Furthermore, they say, it could have been crafted in a manner less burdensome for taxpayers.

"It'll clearly be effective if the goal is to sell vehicles," said Sperling. "If the goal is to reduce energy use or greenhouse gases, it's going to be costly."

Billions in taxpayer dollars have already gone to the auto industry, and the Obama administration has said Chrysler, which is now bankrupt, may never pay back the more than $7 billion it is receiving from the U.S. Treasury.

Sperling said there could be other ways to aid the car industry while promoting fuel-efficiency. For instance, consumers could be given a rebate for buying a fuel-efficient vehicle but charged a fee for purchasing a gas-guzzler.

"I would greatly prefer a policy like that because (the current policy) is taxpayer money," he said. "This is straight and simple a subsidy to the car companies. To evaluate it in any other way is disingenuous."

Economist George Hoffer, a professor at the Virginia Commonwealth University School of Business, said the vouchers for trucks and SUVs will be particularly effective at stimulating the domestic auto industry, since those vehicles provide the largest profits. However, he said the program could be more consumer-friendly by including vouchers for used cars.

"By not including used cars, it becomes very high-income biased," he said. "For the most part, at the bottom end of the feeding chain, the people getting this credit for their used cars would not be (in the market for) a new car, whatsoever."

Representative Inslee said that a national, comprehensive climate and energy policy will have to take into account the needs of different regions in the U.S. He said he expects the bill to be successful, even in spite of concerns that some of the compromises in the climate change bill could detract from its ultimate goals of reducing carbon emissions and stimulating alternative energy industries.

"We can and will obtain an effective bill that will dramatically reduce carbon emissions and dramatically reduce our dependence on foreign oil and still maintain fairness in who takes up the burden," he said.

Ultimately, proponents of the bill say it will help consumers by stimulating job growth in areas like wind power in the Midwest, or biofeul production in the South.

"There's not a place in this country where you cannot find opportunity for job creation," Inslee said.

Add a Comment See all 53 Comments
by diggersown May 16, 2009 7:51 AM EDT
With people sitting on the sidelines not buying cars until this passes; why is congress taking so long? The industry is hurting; dealers are stuck with inventory; now GM and Chrysler have axed dealers. This would be a shot in the arm for all.
Reply to this comment
by Patriot_0311 May 11, 2009 1:39 PM EDT
jtdev1, I understand now why you're a traitor! You're Honda was "assembled" here in the states from "foreign" made components. "Assembled" by US workers making a substandard wage! And where did the profit go, jtdev1? Straight to Japan. Meanwhile, my neighbor who fought in Vietnam and wants to enjoy his retirement, can't. Why? because people like you quit being Americans and got selfish! We all owe something to each other as Americans, that's the thinking that built this nation.United we stand divided we fall. I never said that the domestic brands were all domestic, but we have to get back to where we once were, and buying "American" is a start. If you enjoy your Honda so much, maybe you would enjoy Japanese culture as well, you should look into relocating and enjoying "their" benefits, all bankrolled by the likes of you!
Reply to this comment
by myst_man May 8, 2009 10:16 PM EDT
you do not want to be setting by me at and intersection' My truck is a polluter ' I am stuck with it ' I used to have a new mustang but the bank took it' I like this idea but how do you stop the common thief from cashing in on it'
It would be easer to fix social security than to give a car, away without people, selling them for profit'
all I can think of is one car one family' with three witnesses' signed by a notary
Reply to this comment
by sjc_1 May 8, 2009 11:45 AM EDT
"What's next, cash to have children?"

We have that, it is called the annual tax deduction.
Reply to this comment
by jwc76 May 8, 2009 11:16 AM EDT
Also in this bill, originally. was a voucher to turn in your old vehicle and take public transit instead.

I wonder if that stayed in the bill.
Reply to this comment
by whosaid1 May 8, 2009 11:08 AM EDT
Stick to teabagging.
Posted by LimbaughricansSuck

you seem to have this "unhealthy" fascination with teabagging. It's been my experience that when someone talks about something "nonstop"...that they have this deep seeded desire to DO IT! I suspect that is true with you....go ahead, be bold.....
Reply to this comment
by Missyriver May 8, 2009 11:02 AM EDT
I just see us getting in deeper and deeper, I just hope and pray that Obama and congress know what they are doing. It's like anything else, it looks good on paper but what will it actually do to help the situation we are in. I heard that our economy is starting to get better - where??
I live in a town where there are still over 3,000 steel workers laid off.
Reply to this comment
by jwc76 May 8, 2009 11:02 AM EDT
I'd lke to see the details of this version of "cash-for-clunkers". As originally introduced by Congresswoman Sutton, it was only for car and trucks over nine years old. Part of the debate was whether it would be for domestic manufacturers or any vehicle built in the U.S.

Taking a 2003 car and getting $4500 and laughing all the way to the bank would not be an option.

The other side of this is who gets hurt in this program. The plan was successful in Europe, but Europe has a better public transit system than here in the U.S.

This means low income families will have less cheap options for a used car. Middle income families will also have fewer cheap options for cars that will carry their kids through high school and college.

No longer will a college student needing basic transportation be able to pick up a 1998 Corolla for $2500.00.

Then, there are the salvage yards who specialize in selling used parts. As the bill was originally written, vehicles traded on the "cash-for-clunkers" program were required to be crushed and could not be resold.

If these original plans still hold, more will suffer than be helped.
Reply to this comment
by ubrew12 May 8, 2009 10:59 AM EDT
willcad said: "How much more of this country is the government going to buy or seize control of at the taxpayers' expense? "

The wealthiest 10% of the country own 75% of it. Thats REAL ownership: control.

Gov't spending, as a fraction of GDP, is today where it has been for 50 years, at about 20% of GDP.
Reply to this comment
by dgal878 May 8, 2009 10:55 AM EDT
Yes, yes, yes! Send me a voucher!
Reply to this comment
See all 53 Comments
.

Follow Political Hotsheet

Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook