Obama's List: Who Gets To Ask A Question?

(CBS)
Nowadays, it's standard practice at these sessions to wait quietly for the President to call the name of the next reporter from whom he'll take a question.
It's the journalistic equivalent of The Price Is Right. "Mark Knoller – come on down, you're the next reporter to play "Can You Answer This?"
It's very different from when I first started covering presidential news conferences in 1976 during the Administration of Gerald Ford. Then, reporters would shout and wave their hands at the president in the hope of being recognized for the next question. The practice continued into the Carter, Reagan, Bush/41 and Clinton presidencies.
"Mr. President, Mr. President," would come the bellows from a room full of reporters. The trick was to gauge precisely when the President had spoken the last word of his answer to the previous question and try to be first to speak up in the hope of making eye contact so he'll call you name - or in the case of a young AP Radio reporter whose name he didn't know - getting a nod and an index finger pointed at you to indicate you're at bat.
During the Reagan years, women in the press corps also determined that the President was attracted to red garments and so some would wear bright red dresses to attract Mr. Reagan's attention. CBS News 60 Minutes correspondent Lesley Stahl, who covered the Reagan Presidency, tried that ruse one night, but it backfired. Reagan called on NBC's Judy Woodruff, but called her "Lesley."
The practice of shouting for the President's attention came to the end at the insistence of the second President Bush. He thought it unseemly to be shouted at and made it clear that those who engaged in the practice had zero chance of being selected.
Top aides would usually provide President Bush with a list of reporters on whom he should call. Sometimes, he would be given a seating chart with circles around the names of reporters he should select, an "X" through the names of those he shouldn't, and no markings on other journalists about whom the White House aides had no opinion.
The shouting quickly died down - though there would be occasional breaches of the decorum.
But last evening, the silence was deafening, as the assemblage of reporters waited for President Obama to consult his list and call out the name of the next lucky contestant.
And yet, being a person of ample volume, I miss the way it was.

(CBS)
Obama's First 100 Days
- Obama: Proud But Not Content
- Obama Urges Swine Flu "Contingency Plans"
- Obama: Info Gained Doesn't Justify Torture
- Obama: "I Don't Want To Run Auto Companies"
- Obama's "Enchanted" Answer
- Obama Hints At Change To "State Secrets" Privilege
- Watch The Full Webcast
- Huffington: Bank Bailouts Could Be Obama's "Achilles' Heel"
- Valerie Jarrett Defends Obama On CIA Memos
- Republicans Ponder: What Next?
- Americans Sound Off On Obama's 100 Days
- Photos: 100 Pictures For 100 Days
- Timeline: The Obama Presidency Day By Day
- Steve Chaggaris: 100 Days In, A Presidency Still Undefined
- Brian Montopoli: What Has Obama Meant For Black America?
- Marc Ambinder: Grading Obama's First 100 Days
- Mark Knoller: 100 Days By The Numbers
- Lara Logan: New President To Be Tested By Old Enemies
- Declan McCullagh: Obama's Transparency Vow Receives Mixed Reviews
- Jessica Derschowitz: The "Obama Effect" In Pop Culture
- Around The Web: What The Media Are Saying
- Chart: 100 Days In The Stock Market
- Word Cloud: President Obama's Words
- Polls: Obama | Race Relations | Torture | Same Sex Marriage | Our Poll, Your Questions | Video: Polling Director
- Complete 100 Days Coverage
Obama's Press Conference:
CBSNews.com's 100 Days Webcast With Katie Couric:
Recap, Analysis & Reaction:
Popular in Politics
- Obama forgets to salute while boarding Marine One Play Video
- Obama prom pictures surface 131 Comments
- IRS' Lerner was asked to resign, refused: GOP Sen. 179 Comments
- GOP Rep.: Obama elected because of Reagan's immigration reforms
- Petraeus biographer regrets affair
- Pelosi ties bridge collapse to sequester
- Is President Obama ending the war on terror? 290 Comments
- Palin Image: Confident, Secure Play Video












Posted by mcthreeteeth at 7:26 AM : May 1, 2009
And you would be much happier in Venezuala.
This may be a little worse then waterboarding. This is what they to criminals. Now tell us that waterboarding is torture.
Posted by wtcmedic911 at 9:34 PM : Apr 30, 2009
Yeah me too. But look what has happened to our country from 2001 until exactly today. Big Government only becoming Gigantic since January. So much for transparency, Teleprompters can not answer questions for Berry so why not control who asks the questions so he knows whats coming. So much for tranparency.
At least we are SO much better off than the days when Bush was caught planting fake journalists in the White House Press Corps so that he could dodge having to take real questions.
American citizens are so thankful to the White House Press Corps for being there on our behalf to ask the tough questions....even if it requires having to patiently wait to be called upon. You'll have to excuse the millions of American citizens who are all now sighing with relief as we watch Obama temper strength with compassion. It is SO nice to once again see a President acting Presidential again.
What we have to worry about now is a post-Obama regime that will happen in very short order because we nor the President has the guts to put these TOO BIG TO FAIL banks, like Goldman Sucks and JP Morgan into RECEIVERSHIP and BANKRUPTCY RE-STRUCTERIING.
I say this and will continue to repeat posts like this as one of the few who predicted that our economy would not just enter a recession/depression but a general breakdown-crisis that end the United States and put in line with how British idiot PM Gordon Brown would like to think of us as just 'continents' of North America.
We have to do what ever is necessary to not stop the Obama/Clinton administration, because it's already doomed but to stop what will replace it, which is an extreme Fascist, possibly Republican but more like an Independent that will impose the austerity required by the very banksters we're bailing-out.
It won't solve anything, although that's how the new regime will sell itself, because the bail-out of the BIG BANKS will by-and-large be complete, leaving the taxpayer bankrupt and Goldman Sucks stronger to officially take over the reigns of Sovereign power.
Folks, the bail-outs are dangerous, not because it's bailing-out the rich, but because the purpose of the bail-outs is to purposely bankrupt the United States so a rich oligarchy can rule over mankind, reducing the population to less then a few hundred million people all serving as slaves and serfs to these greedy evil people.
PUT GOLDMAN SUCKS, JP MORGAN BofA, HSBC AND OTHERS INTO RECEIVERSHIP!