Obama Says Charitable Giving Not Affected By Tax Increases

(AP)
"I think it's the right thing to do, where we've got to make some difficult choices," Mr. Obama said before launching into an explanation of his tax policy.
He referenced the tax plans of three of his predecessors when describing his alteration to tax rates for the wealthy.
"For the top 5 percent, they're the ones who typically saw huge gains in their income," he said. "I -- I fall in that category. And what we've said is, for those folks, let's not renew the Bush tax cuts, so let's go back to the rates that existed back in -- during the Clinton era, when wealthy people were still wealthy and doing just fine, and let's look at the -- the level at which people can itemize their deductions."
He said he decided to return to the rate that existed in the Reagan administration, at which "people are still going to be able to make charitable contributions. It just means, if you give $100 and you're in this tax bracket, at a certain point, instead of being able to write off 36 percent or 39 percent, you're writing off 28 percent."
Mr. Obama argued that the if the contribution is really charitable than his policy shift should not be a reason not to give.
"This provision would affect about 1 percent of the American people. They would still get deductions. It's just that they wouldn't be able to write off 39 percent," he said.
He added that this provision is "not going to cripple" the wealthy. "They'll still be well-to-do," he said. "And, you know, ultimately, if we're going to tackle the serious problems that we've got, then, in some cases, those who are more fortunate are going to have to pay a little bit more."
"There's very little evidence that this has a significant impact on charitable giving," Mr. Obama said.
"I'll tell you what has a significant impact on charitable giving, is a financial crisis and an economy that's contracting. And so the most important thing that I can do for charitable giving is to fix the economy, to get banks lending again, to get businesses opening their doors again, to get people back to work again," he argued.
Full Coverage Of Obama's Press Conference:
- By Topic: Budget | AIG Outrage | Tax Increases | Race | Mexican Drug Cartels | Israel | Funding For Veterans | Sacrifice
- Full Transcript
- Fact Check: Obama Having It Both Ways?
- Analysis: Philosophy Of Persistence | Grades From Marc Ambinder | Instant Reaction | Focus Group Weighs In
- Video: | | | |
Popular in Politics
- Officials on Benghazi: "We made mistakes, but without malice"
- Top IRS official to invoke 5th Amendment at congressional testimony 126 Comments
- Senate committee approves immigration bill
- U.S. IDs several men possibly responsible for Benghazi attack
- Va. GOP candidate: Planned Parenthood "more lethal" for blacks than KKK 1200 Comments
- Obama: "Full focus" is on recovery from Oklahoma tornado 86 Comments
- Poll: Most think IRS targeting was deliberate 172 Comments
- Anthony Weiner comeback try begins: Running for NYC mayor














Also, it's doesn't matter what the intent of the giver of charity is, the fact is that they are giving to charity! So, if the government reduces the incentive to give to charity, the charities will receive reduced amount of funds! Period!
Remember, the top %5 of earners pay the vast majority of taxes to the government, so they're easy targets. But they also donate the most too. They invest the most, etc, etc. Reduce the exemptions for mortgages, guess what they're not going to do as much? Buy homes, build homes, etc. (less jobs for home construction and all the tricle down from that) If you think the rich are just going to throw up their hands and give in, you're crazy.
I thought this president was about change? It looks like he's using the same old techniques for gaining more revenue for government spending that has been done by past administrations. Tax and spend... errr no, spend and tax!
When you hear the President speak the words "...we've got to make some difficult choices." understand that SOMEONE is going to get hurt ultimately by his decision, and it will be us, directly or indirectly.
How does that song go... "Everything old is new again..." Don't buy the hype people.
While we are at it, we can rewrite the provision of Medicare Part B, where the government is prohibited from negotiating volume discounts on Medicare drug benefits.
There are many common sense approaches to more efficient government, but we have to remove the obstacles to practical reasoning.
Posted by Obama_the_Clown at 6:56 AM : Mar 25, 2009
It?s more like called TREASON by those that don?t think that they should have to pay their taxes
and, support anti-American policies through a political organization called the Republican Party.
Posted by Obama_the_Clown at 6:56 AM : Mar 25, 2009
-----------------------------------------------
This is drivel. It is proven historically that the repugnicans "trickle down" effect DOES NOT WORK. the rich get richer while the poor, well you know. That in itself is class warfare. use your head, not your pocketbook.