Obama Signs Spending Bill – With Objections
President Obama this afternoon privately signed the $410 billion omnibus spending bill passed by Congress, which he has acknowledged is "imperfect" because of potentially-unnecessary earmarks. (Read more about the bill here>.)
In announcing his signing of the bill, the president issued a signing statement saying the Department of Justice has advised him that the bill includes provisions that "raise constitutional concerns" and that he thus may not follow them.
"The signing statement on the Omnibus bill very much resembles the kind that President Bush was criticized for," notes CBS News White House Correspondent Mark Knoller.
Mr. Obama outlined five objections in the statement. The first is that certain provisions "would unduly interfere with my constitutional authority in the area of foreign affairs by effectively directing the Executive on how to proceed or not proceed in negotiations or discussions with international organizations and foreign governments."
"I will not treat these provisions as limiting my ability to negotiate and enter into agreements with foreign nations," the president said.
He also noted that a portion of the bill "prohibits the use of certain funds for the use of the Armed Forces in United Nations peacekeeping missions under the command or operational control of a foreign national unless my military advisers have recommended to me that such involvement is in the national interests of the United States."
"This provision raises constitutional concerns by constraining my choice of particular persons to perform specific command functions in military missions, by conditioning the exercise of my authority as Commander in Chief on the recommendations of subordinates within the military chain of command, and by constraining my diplomatic negotiating authority," the president said. "Accordingly, I will apply this provision consistent with my constitutional authority and responsibilities."
Another set of provisions restricts the reallocation of funds; Mr. Obama said "these are impermissible forms of legislative aggrandizement," adding that "executive officials shall treat such guidelines as advisory."
On Monday, Knoller notes, the president issued a presidential memorandum about presidential signing statements.
"There is no doubt that the practice of issuing such statements can be abused," the president said, adding that the statements "should not be used to suggest the President will disregard statutory requirements on the basis of policy agreements."
And yet, Knoller points out, the objections made by the president today "are just like the kind of objections President Bush would raise in signing statements."
The full text of the announcement is below.
STATEMENT BY THE PRESIDENT
Today I have signed into law H.R. 1105, the "Omnibus Appropriations Act, 2009." This bill completes the work of last year by providing the funding necessary for the smooth operation of our Nation's Government.
(AP Photo/Gerald Herbert)
As I announced this past Monday, it is a legitimate constitutional function, and one that promotes the value of transparency, to indicate when a bill that is presented for Presidential signature includes provisions that are subject to well-founded constitutional objections. The Department of Justice has advised that a small number of provisions of the bill raise constitutional concerns.
Popular in Politics
- Michelle Obama decries "slander" that educated blacks are "trying to act white" Play Video
- Both parties vow to "get to the bottom" of IRS scandal 145 Comments
- Va. GOP candidate: Planned Parenthood "more lethal" for blacks than KKK 124 Comments
- Benghazi-disciplined diplomat a prolific poet
- Romney condemns "breach of trust" in Washington 248 Comments
- Republicans continue beating Benghazi drum 300 Comments
- Adviser on White House scandals: "Partisan fishing expeditions" won't distract Obama 203 Comments
- Officials on Benghazi: "We made mistakes, but without malice"