Political Hotsheet
By

Sarah Dutton /

CBS News/ March 6, 2009, 1:15 PM

Polls Show Increasing Concern About Afghan War

The war in Afghanistan rivals the war in Iraq as a top foreign policy concern, according to a CBS News/New York Times Poll conducted in February 2009. That poll found Americans almost as likely to choose the war in Afghanistan as the war in Iraq for the foreign policy area that the public wants the President and Congress to concentrate on most.





Afghanistan is a priority for more Democrats than Republicans. President Obama has drawn attention to the war there in recent weeks, and the war in Iraq has long been unpopular with Democrats.

In addition, a growing percentage of Americans thinks the number of U.S. troops in Afghanistan should be increased, even as most also say it's important to bring troops home from Iraq. Forty-two percent think troops in Afghanistan should be increased, up from 34 percent in January.





Support for sending more troops there is consistent across party lines. As is often the case with public opinion about war, there is a gender gap; 49 percent of men would like to see troop levels increased, compared to just 36 percent of women.

A look back at public opinion about the war in Afghanistan shows that while Americans were initially optimistic in their evaluations, in recent months they have become far more pessimistic.

From 2001, when the war began, through early 2003 majorities thought the war was going well for the United States: 83 percent in October 2001, rising to a high of 93 percent in December 2001, and 72 percent in September 2002.

But as the war there continued, Americans' initial optimism dwindled, and by late 2008 views of the war in Afghanistan had drastically changed. In August 2008, just 28 percent thought the war in Afghanistan was going well, and again in December, 27 percent held that view.





By comparison, Americans were never as optimistic about the war in Iraq as they were about the war in Afghanistan. The highest level of optimism about how things were going in Iraq was 72 percent, reached in May 2003, a few months after the war began.

The timing of the war in Afghanistan no doubt contributed to the public's positive assessments of it. Americans rallied around their flag in the wake of the September 11th terrorist attacks. In January 2002, 89 percent approved of the military attacks led by the U.S. against targets in Afghanistan.

The benchmark with which Americans say they judge the outcome of the war in Afghanistan has been the capture or Osama bin Laden; and the failure to do so may account for why the public has turned sour on the progress of this war. Throughout 2002, a majority of Americans said that if bin Laden was not captured or killed, then the U.S. would not have won the war in Afghanistan.



Sarah Dutton is the CBS News director of surveys. Poll Positions is weekly Hotsheet feature on polling trends from the CBS News Survey and Polling Unit. Click here for more posts from the series..
© 2009 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
21 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
inachu1 says:
We do not belong over there.
Go read the book "SHOCK DOCTRINE"
A new wave of republicans just do not want a smaller govt but they want to totally eviscerate govt and take down all protective barries regarding to the stock exchange and let our entire nation run off of profits. Sounds like nothing but shady dealing to me.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
kristinaofminneapolis says:
What an oxymoron, the title of the graph, "Think the war in Afghanistan is going well". Oh please, how in heavens can a war "go well"? What in God's name is good about a war? What does "going well" mean, anyway, in relation to war - that lots of people are being killed, bombs are burning things up, that children are screaming in horror? How immoral and lame we have become to casually proclaim that a war is or is not going well! It's sickening. What is the war being fought for anyway? What is the goal? I have no enemies in Afghanistan, the Afghani people were not responsible for 9/11, why should we be occupying their nation and causing untold misery there? Wake up, Americans, this is Obama's Vietnam. If you liked Iraq, you're going to love Afghanistan. US OUT OF THE MIDDLE EAST!
reply
laurenjh replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
I could not agree with you more, I think we lost site of the reason going to the Middle East years ago. And I didnt even agree with the original reason in the 1st place. I am however not saying im not proud of our soldiers over there, I just wish I knew the reason why more precisely. And though Im sure most of the soldiers know why they are doing what they are doing at this particular time and the reason. But I wonder how many new soldiers coming in know the reason anyone went over in the 1st place, and why its reason for sooo much money, death, and more issues?
linkicon reporticon emailicon
cereally says:
I am surprized that over the last...i don't know 2 or so years with the price of fuel jumping up and down that americans think it is the only way to pull out...fuel/gasoline is not going to be the standard. we have many other options....they have not received the money or the interest of many voters, but these resources do exist. and before anyone jumps me ....yes i am looking into way to provide energy and what not....it requires alot of research as well as trial and error, but there are many optional forms of energy that can run your house , computer, dishwasher etc. if we spent more time learning what these people are doing to change how we use oil/gas perhaps we wouldn't feel so hopelessly tied to countries we nearly have to barter our souls to for fuel.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
lambor59 says:
Why are the US and other nations fighting each other, they should party, smoke, drink and have a good time together.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
skydrifter1 says:
No one has ever produced any viable - repeat - viable evidence that Afghanistan had anything to do with 911. Afghanistan has a huge capacity to produce opium/heroin; ala the Golden Triangle which drove the Viet Nam War. The Taliban made the mistake of shutting down that opium production.

Did they burn the history books? Is America that quick to forget - or not want to know? What's the deal?

America believed the Bush propaganda, and now has a war against domestic economic collapse; bring 'em home!

It's that bloody simple.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
opedanderson says:
Bin Laden is not only dead. But he may have never even existed. At least the legendary version of him, that is.

The information stream in the War on Terror is tainted and manipulated you really cant really know what the "truth" is......
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
lee2261 says:
Makes sense to me. I think Bin Laden is dead or close to it.
To calm the entire area will take diplomacy and a kind of warfare that acts behind the scene. This continuing stream of information is not helping military actions.
The country has the resources to grow on its own and to win people and eliminate the Taliban, at least the very extreme people will take some diplomacy and economic rewards. Their government should create the business and jobs to keep people from poverty and fighting.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
AOCGUY says:
According to the U.S. Geological Survey Afghanistan may possess up to 36 trillion cubic feet of natural gas, 3.6 billion barrels of petroleum and up to 1,325 million barrels of natural gas liquids. Other reports show that the country has huge amounts of gold, copper, coal, iron ore and other minerals. The government of Afghanistan is in the process of extracting and exporting its copper reserves, which will earn $1.2 billion dollars in royalties and taxes every year for the next 30 years.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
inventagod says:
That first graphic sure looks like a PEACE SIGN....

Maybe we should catch a clue???
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
steeepe says:
If Bush had done his job in Afghanistan instead of fumbling around in Iraq, we wouldn't be having this conversation now.
reply
See all 21 Comments