Executive Privilege Compromise: Win-Win-Win
4336078Believe it or not, this is precisely the way the Founding Fathers envisioned how the Constitution could work. Pressure from the judicial branch (a pending deadline to file a substantive brief) and the legislative branch (Congressional subpoenas to Bush officials) forced the White House into compromising over the scope of executive privilege in the U.S. Attorney matter. It's a win-win-win, Steve Carell would say.
Or, you can look at it another way. The deal that finally delivers Karl Rove and Harriet Miers into Rep. John Conyers Congressional den of inquiry came about because neither the Obama Administration, nor the Congress, wanted to risk creating "bad" legal precedent about the scope of the privilege—federal law that might be political convenient now, but which could hinder future administrations (or even this one, a few years down the road).
Uncertainly about the results of litigation is what makes all sorts of parties settle all sorts of disputes all over the country—it worked this time, too.
The Obama Administration retains some flexibility to deal with future episodes where the president may not want his men and women talking. Congress gets to move its important investigation forward. The federal courts dodge a dicey political bullet. Team Bush gets to say it stayed true to its expansive view of the privilege. And Rove, Miers and company get to come in from the cold for a face-saving shot at telling the truth.
However you look at it, this compromise is a good thing for anyone and everyone who wants more (and more complete) answers about why all those U.S. attorneys were fired for political reasons, during the second term of the Bush administration.
Who gave the orders? Why? Who covered it up? Why? An official and thorough accounting is long overdue. The only regret I am sure many Americans have is that they aren't likely to be able to watch the proceedings, live or on tape.
An interesting part of the deal, the details of which haven't yet hit the rest of us, is that the Obama administration formally superseded the eleventh-hour order from Fred Fielding, White House Counsel for President Bush, who directed the potential witnesses not to testify even after the president they served was no longer in office. Fielding's maneuver pushed against the outer edges of the doctrine. I look forward to reading precisely how far back the Obama lawyers were willing to roll the privilege, or if they were at all.
More soon when there are more details…
© 2009 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. Or, you can look at it another way. The deal that finally delivers Karl Rove and Harriet Miers into Rep. John Conyers Congressional den of inquiry came about because neither the Obama Administration, nor the Congress, wanted to risk creating "bad" legal precedent about the scope of the privilege—federal law that might be political convenient now, but which could hinder future administrations (or even this one, a few years down the road).
Uncertainly about the results of litigation is what makes all sorts of parties settle all sorts of disputes all over the country—it worked this time, too.
The Obama Administration retains some flexibility to deal with future episodes where the president may not want his men and women talking. Congress gets to move its important investigation forward. The federal courts dodge a dicey political bullet. Team Bush gets to say it stayed true to its expansive view of the privilege. And Rove, Miers and company get to come in from the cold for a face-saving shot at telling the truth.
However you look at it, this compromise is a good thing for anyone and everyone who wants more (and more complete) answers about why all those U.S. attorneys were fired for political reasons, during the second term of the Bush administration.
Who gave the orders? Why? Who covered it up? Why? An official and thorough accounting is long overdue. The only regret I am sure many Americans have is that they aren't likely to be able to watch the proceedings, live or on tape.
An interesting part of the deal, the details of which haven't yet hit the rest of us, is that the Obama administration formally superseded the eleventh-hour order from Fred Fielding, White House Counsel for President Bush, who directed the potential witnesses not to testify even after the president they served was no longer in office. Fielding's maneuver pushed against the outer edges of the doctrine. I look forward to reading precisely how far back the Obama lawyers were willing to roll the privilege, or if they were at all.
More soon when there are more details…
Popular in Politics
- Officials on Benghazi: "We made mistakes, but without malice" 274 Comments
- Ousted IRS chief: "I did not mislead" the American people 252 Comments
- Where is the Benghazi cover-up Republicans promised? 343 Comments
- Why Obama should worry that current scandals might impact 2016 216 Comments
- FBI seeks anonymous source behind Menendez allegations
- Immigration deal reached in House
- First lady: "Reject the slander" that educated blacks are "trying to act white"
- IRS official moved from office that targeted conservatives to Obamacare office
http://ncacblog.wordpress.com/2009/03/05/the-right-to-know-what-karl-rove-harriet-miers-did-on-our-dime-and-in-our-name/
Rove had knowledge that Republican Election Victories had been manipulated by the Voter Machine Company Diebold. Karl Rove wanted to smear Democratic Candidates to obscure and haze the voter fraud issue in a preemptive effort even in cases where neither fraud nor improprieties took place.
No one is above the Law in the United States even President Karl Rove.
Posted by spneumatic
Maybe, at least he was the one who admitted to it. The liar Libby (Scooter Libby, Libby, Lbibby...Is going to jail, jail, jail... where he'll take it, take it, take it... in the tail, tail, tail! Scooter Libby, Libby, Libbly, had some power, power, power.... he better hold onto the soap in the shower, shower, shower!) would have spilled all the beans if dubya had not commuted ('This sentence is too excessive for the crime, therefore I am commuting Mr. Libby's sentence.") his sentence. And they say we have no king.
I have firsthand experienced the tyranny executive privilege represents. Look at who and what Bush protected when he first used executive privilege (FBI-Winter Hill Gang murder conspiracy). I sadly must report: The Tories are back!
If I remember correctly, it wasn't Karl Rove who "leaked" Valerie Plame's name---it was Richard Armitage.