House to vote on "In God We Trust" motto
AP
The Republican-led House will vote today on whether to reaffirm "In God We Trust" as the nation's motto.
While the issue may seem non-controversial, the bill to reaffirm the motto may not pass because Democrats say the vote is a waste of time, and today's "fast-track" vote will require the approval of two-thirds of the House. The bill's Republican sponsor says it is needed to stop a "disturbing trend" of dismissing the motto.
Today's House vote will "directly confront a disturbing trend of inaccuracies and omissions, misunderstandings of church and state, rogue court challenges, and efforts to remove God from the public domain by unelected bureaucrats," Rep. J. Randy Forbes, R-Va., said in a statement. "As our nation faces challenging times, it is appropriate for Members of Congress and our nation--like our predecessors--to firmly declare our trust in God, believing that it will sustain us for generations to come."
As evidence of this "disturbing trend," Forbes pointed to the fact that in a 2010 speech in Indonesia, President Obama called the phrase "E pluribus unum" the nation's motto. He also pointed to the dispute over the use of the phrase "in God we trust" in the relatively new visitors center at the Capitol Building.
A few Democrats have signed on as co-sponsors of the bill, but others have protested it. In a March House Judiciary Committee report, five Democrats wrote that the bill was a distraction from real problems.
"Instead of working to help American families keep a roof over their heads and food on their tables, we are debating whether or not to affirm and proliferate a motto that was adopted in 1956 and that is not imperiled in any respect," the report said.
The Democrats also argued the bill "creates unnecessary and excessive government entanglement with religion."
Similarly, Democrats complained Republicans were unjustifiably focused on social issues last month when the House voted to keep taxpayer money from funding abortions. "Everybody in America has the creation of jobs as their top priority and what are we doing, but wasting time," House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi said at the time.
The Washington Post notes that Republicans adopted new rules when they took the majority, prohibiting votes against most symbolic and commemorative resolutions, arguing that such measures were wasteful and made up one-third of all legislation considered by the previous Congress.
Popular in Politics
- Officials on Benghazi: "We made mistakes, but without malice" 438 Comments
- IRS' Lerner: "I have not done anything wrong" 285 Comments
- Anthony Weiner comeback try begins: Running for NYC mayor 111 Comments
- Major immigration overhaul passes first big test 69 Comments
- Will tornado relief funding escape politics?
- Top IRS official to invoke 5th Amendment at congressional testimony 215 Comments
- Christie: Keep politics out of Oklahoma disaster relief
- Va. GOP candidate won't apologize for comments on abortion, gays
I'm pretty sure there is a creator and without His resources we all become a wisp in the wind. So my two cents, Yes acknowledge the creator of the universe in all of our daily work.
Obama 7 Lies In Under 2 Minutes
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UErR7i2onW0
Vote Ron Paul...he can't be bought by the elite.
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=f7a_1184871139
The above quote from the article sums up this total waste of time and resources. This is NOT a vote to "keep or remove" the motto.....it is a "re-affirmation" of something that is NOT IMPERILED. How difficult is it to understand?
There are much more important issues to spend such time and effort on. It's just another form of obstructionism and distraction from the GOP.
... wait, it won't?
Well, look at how well it'll get the economy back on track!
... huh. Won't do that either.
How about help small businesses? No? Help someone with their mortgage? No? Do something about the deregulated businesses tearing up the environment? Do anything about repairing roads, bridges and the like? None of that?
So, it's more posturing by the Republicans to try to delay actual action for the sake of short term political gains. Perhaps they should listen to Eisenhower's farewell speech (you remember Eisenhower, an *actual* Republican and someone who knew how to be a leader) as he warned against sacrificing our long term prosperity for short term gain.
This bit of legislative foolishness should have exactly *one* effect on unemployment - namely, kicking all those who thought this was "needed" or a good idea out to the curb next election cycle. What a waste of time, and worse, what a *betrayal* of the people who elected them to do a job.
Oh, and if you *really* think global warming as it is right now is "not an issue" or is part of the "natural cycle," you need to sit up and pay attention to the people who actually know what they're talking about - because it certainly *is* an issue, and is certainly *not* behaving naturally now. What I find most (sickeningly) ironic is how some of the same places that pay for obfuscating studies that misrepresent data (oil companies and the like) are taking advantage of *record* loss of arctic ice to rush in and drill, drill, drill some more.