Income gap will keep growing without changes, CBO director says

Protesters gather at night in Grant Park during an Occupy Chicago march and protest, Saturday, Oct. 22, 2011, in Chicago. Protesters led a slow march from Chicago's financial district Saturday, taking more than 45 minutes to reach the park.

/ AP Photo/Paul Beaty

The rich got substantially richer in the last three decades, while the rest of America was left behind -- and that trend may only continue unless something changes, according to Congress' official budget analyst. Some Democrats say it's the rules in Washington that need to change.

The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office on Tuesday released a report showing that between 1979 and 2007, the top 1 percent of Americans with the highest incomes have seen their incomes grow by an average of 275 percent. At the same time, the 60 percent of Americans in the middle of the income scale saw their incomes increase by just 40 percent. The poorest fifth of Americans saw their income rise by 18 percent.

CBO Director Doug Elmendorf told Congress on Wednesday the CBO's projections "do incorporate some ongoing widening of the income distribution."

"We don't know, and I don't think our projection calls for a continued widening to that extent," he added. "But neither do we see forces at hand that would cause that to be reversed in coming years."

Democrats this year have pointed to the growing income gap in the nation as evidence that Congress should raise taxes on the wealthy and implement other policy changes to advance the middle class.

"I would assume that we are where we are because of -- well, let me put it this way -- to the extent that government policy has allowed this gap to exist, if we continue current policy, then it's fair to say that we are going to experience that kind of continued widening of the wealth gap in America," Rep. James Clyburn, D-S.C., said to Elmendorf Wednesday.

CBO: Top 1% getting exponentially richer
Poll: Many unemployed pessimistic about finding work
Poll: 43 percent agree with views of "Occupy Wall Street"
Left behind in America: Who's to blame for the wealth divide?

Elmendorf was testifying before the congressional "supercommittee," which is charged with finding $1.2 trillion in budget savings. Democrats in the committee, like Clyburn, said their mandate should incorporate plans to stimulate the economy as well as plans to reduce the deficit.

Angry protesters have demonstrated for weeks across the country against corporate greed and economic disparity, adopting the slogan, "We are the 99%" to highlight the growing gap between the wealthiest 1 percent of Americans and everyone else. One such protester interrupted yesterday's supercommittee hearing.

A recent CBS News/New York Times poll showed that 66 percent of Americans think income should be distributed more evenly in the country.

Americans are also angry over lingering unemployment, which has been stuck at 9 percent since 2009. A significant portion of unemployed Americans are pessimistic about the future, according to a new CBS News/ New York Times poll and more than half have suffered an emotional toll because of their joblessness.

Rep. Xavier Becerra, D-Calif., pointed out that focusing on increasing employment could help reduce the deficit. "The more you put those 15 million [unemployed] Americans back to work... that's thousands of dollars per worker that... could be revenue to the government, which would help us decrease these deficits," he said.

Elmendorf said that as a general rule of thumb, the federal government collects about 25 cents in taxes for every dollar earned.

[outsource_congress]

I wonder why they don't publish the fact that this huge disparity and wage stagnation conicides almost exactly with our involvement in so-called "free trade". Sure, we "benefit" from being able to buy more cheap Chinese imports at Walmart (most of them toxic.) And sure, a few people (the 1%) benefit from higher profit margins and returns on investments in companies that move jobs to third world countries. Sure, when they were selling the "free trade" pig-in-a-poke, they reassured us the jobs going to the third world would be replaced with better jobs, high-tech jobs, jobs in innovation and technology. And where are all those jobs now? The third world.

Why won't anyone admit none of this is going to turn around until we extricate ourselves from all this "free trade" non-sense that is really nothing more than a race to the bottom? We have momentum progressing to a third world status ever since NAFTA was signed. We need to bring our jobs back. The only people "free trade" is benefiting are the top 1% and a few tin-pot dictators in third world countries.

[acommoner]

Isn't it time to move the "Occupy" protests inside to the City and/or County Council of Commissioners meetings for the winter? Why not demonstrate/advocate for something that would bring about real change? Fair Free Trade - The key to sustainable recovery is the return of manufacturing (maker) jobs to the USA. US American Jobs will not return to the USA until 3/4 of our Local Governments adopt a policy of County Wide Fair Free Trade Zones. Where all products and/or services offered for sale/use in "The Zone" (be it county, state, or nation) must be produced and/or provided in accordance with all USA; quality, safety, health, environment and wage standards, and no one is even talking about this option. Go to: www.manifestry.info > Fair Free Trade

[stn_sage]

We don't need a budget analyst to tell us this!
Most of us, figured this out, a long time ago!
This, is probably only news to those members of
the supercommittee, who were probably BOTH shocked
and dismayed to learn of it (sarcasm)!