Romney: It's "dangerous" to choose president based on religion
Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney said Tuesday he thought it was "dangerous" to select a president based on the church or synagogue he or she belonged to - and that doing so would be an "enormous departure from the principles of our Constitution."
Speaking in Las Vegas at CNN's Republican presidential debate, the former Massachusetts governor said he wasn't "going to lose sleep over" over a Texas pastor's having called his Mormon faith a "cult." But he argued that the implications of the statement itself were troubling.
The pastor, Robert Jeffress, made the comment after delivering introductory remarks endorsing Perry at the Values Voter Summit earlier this month. The Texas governor has rejected the characterization of Mormonism, but has refused to disavow the pastor.
GOP debate in Vegas: Winners and losers"You know, with regards to the disparaging comments about my faith, I've heard worse, so I'm not going to lose sleep over that," Romney said.
Romney noted that "What I actually found was most troubling" about the ordeal was that the reverend said, during his introduction for Perry, that "in choosing our nominee, we should inspect his religion."
"That idea that we should choose people based upon their religion for public office is what I find to be most troubling, because the founders of this country went to great length to make sure -- and even put it in the Constitution -- that we would not choose people who represent us in government based upon their religion, that this would be a nation that recognized and respected other faiths, where there's a plurality of faiths, where there was tolerance for other people and faiths," Romney said. "That's bedrock principle."
Romney's "credibility" on health care attackedFact checking the GOP Vegas debate
Huntsman mocks 'game show' debate in Vegas
Romney criticized Perry for responding enthusiastically to the introduction, rather than saying, "Reverend Jeffress, you got that wrong. We should select people not based upon their faith."
"The concept that we select people based on the church or the synagogue they go to, I think, is a very dangerous - and an enormous departure from the principles of our Constitution."
When it was suggested that Perry then apologize to Romney, Perry again distanced himself from the pastor's remarks, although not with the pastor himself.
"I said I did not agree with the -- Pastor Jeffress's remarks," Perry said. "I don't agree with them. I can't apologize any more than that."
Cain, Romney under fire at Republican debateMitt Romney and Rick Perry go mano-a-mano over immigration
Rick Perry: Time to consider defunding United Nations
Cain's rivals: We love you, but we hate 9-9-9
Newt Gingrich emphasized that while he believes a person's faith matters in the context of a presidential bid, "none of us should rush in judgment of others in the way in which they approach God."
"Well, I think if the question is, does faith matter? Absolutely," he said. "How can you have a country which is founded on truths which begins we are endowed by our creator with certain inalienable rights? How can you have the Northwest Ordinance of 1787 which says religion, morality and knowledge being important, education matters. That's the order: religion, morality and knowledge."
But, he added, "I happen to think that none of us should rush in judgment of others in the way in which they approach God. And I think that all of us up here I believe would agree."
Popular in Politics
- Officials on Benghazi: "We made mistakes, but without malice" 280 Comments
- Where is the Benghazi cover-up Republicans promised? 352 Comments
- FBI seeks anonymous source behind Menendez allegations
- Ousted IRS chief: "I did not mislead" the American people 253 Comments
- Why Obama should worry that current scandals might impact 2016 217 Comments
- House GOP to vote on Obamacare repeal - Vol. 37 928 Comments
- Immigration deal reached in House
- Obama: I didn't know about IRS report 608 Comments
Except when the GOP decides to make Democrats out to be Muslims when they aren't. Then it's OK.
To say that digging in to a presidential candidates religion is dangerous is foolish. It's dangerous not to. We can elect whomever we choose to. But to take a significant tool for determining how a president might respond to important issues is idiotic. Elect an atheist, a Hindu, a Mormon, a Catholic, a Protestant, a Muslim, a witch..... whomever you like.... just know what they believe or choose not to believe.
Unfortunately for you Mitt, did you happen to catch all of the people in the audience CHEERING when Bachmann said that we should keep shoveling BILLIONS OF DOLLARS each year to Israel?
They didn't cheer because "foreign aid" is the right thing to do. They did it because they're brainwashed religious zealots. THAT is what you can expect, if you hope to win the GOP nomination. Good luck fighting that uphill battle.
ALL religions are man made.
Why would anyone vote for someone who is part of what killed this economy? Disgusting. I hate this man.
And actually it isn't dangerous at all to have an opinion on his choice of religion. It does reflect on the person. Mormonism is weird, plain and simple.
And Mopar is correct, your last comment reveals more of a bigotrous bias about YOU more than anything about Romney.