Scott Brown camp regrets plagiarism "oversight"
The Boston Globe first reported the plagiarism, which the newspaper was directed to by the Democratic Super PAC American Bridge 21st Century.
"I was raised to believe that there are no limits to individual achievement and no excuses to justify indifference," Brown was quoted as saying on his site in comments that were removed earlier this week. "From an early age, I was taught that success is measured not in material accumulations, but in service to others. I was encouraged to join causes larger than myself, to pursue positive change through a sense of mission, and to stand up for what I believe."
Dole, the former North Carolina Republican senator, used those exact words in kicking off her campaign in 2002.
Brown's spokesman told the Globe that Dole's website, where the speech was posted, was "one of the models" for Brown's site, and that "during construction of the site, the content on this particular page was inadvertently transferred without being rewritten."
"It was a staff level oversight which we regret and is being corrected," added spokesman John Donnelly.
Popular in Politics
- Obama forgets to salute while boarding Marine One Play Video
- Obama prom pictures surface 130 Comments
- IRS' Lerner was asked to resign, refused: GOP Sen. 163 Comments
- GOP Rep.: Obama elected because of Reagan's immigration reforms
- Is President Obama ending the war on terror? 284 Comments
- Now, some unions upset over Obamacare
- Rand Paul uses 2016 bully pulpit to push Obama on drones
- IRS official Lois Lerner placed on leave 131 Comments













Re: Liz Warren, here's my question, does this count as i) factual ii) embellishment iii) a flat out lie. Elizabeth Warren 2011 commencement speech recounting the first day of law school, claiming the Professor, without introduction asks, "What is assumpsit?"
Her speech is here: http://www.consumerfinance.gov/speech/rutgers-school-of-law-commencement-address/
Then, with scant Googling you see the same story in a book written well before Warren's commencement speech "Justice at Guantanemo: One Woman's Odyssey and her Crusaid for Human Rights" by Kristine Huskey (page 81, electronically on Amazon)
From Huskey's book:
"Assumpsit?" he inquired on the first day of class. "What does assumpsit mean?" There were no volunteers....
From Ms. Warren's Speech:
Professor John Lowenthal strode to the front of the room, pulled out his pocket watch, and stared at it silently. At exactly the moment the class was scheduled to begin, Professor Lowenthal looked up and, without any sort of introduction at all, said, "What is assumpsit?"
The common threads: i) crusty old professor ii) Contracts class iii) the case "Hawkins v. McGee" made well known by by Paper Chase the 1973 movie, which, probably no coincidence was released during Ms. Warren's 1st year law school.
Now her opponent is being accused of plagiarism on a website. Isn't she guilty of same plagiarism or embellishment?
The history of their behavior proves they cannot be trusted to work to benefit ordinary Americans. It also proves they place political power over the well being of Americans and the country. Their behavior proves they have more allegiance to Grover Norquist and their party over our constitution and country.
Any party that does that cannot be rewarded for doing so.Therefore, they are undeserving of votes and support from ordinary/struggling Americans.
scott brown accumulates blunders,
here it is plagiarist, what next?
"au revoir"
Someone in his campaign should check the code behind the "Contribute" button on his site to make sure that donations are not being secretly diverted to Elizabeth Warren's eBay account to finance her growing collection of Duran Duran memorabilia.
Yeah, right. Scott Brown has had the same basic website "construction" since 2009. Check out this page:
http://www.scottbrown.com/issues
In the section on Iran at the bottom, he (or somebody) says:
"A personal meeting with Ahmadinejad, as suggested by my opponent..."
What opponent? Martha Coakley in 2009? Update your site, buddy.