Political Hotsheet
By

Dan Farber /

CBS News/ September 12, 2011, 10:52 PM

Tea Party audience gets into the GOP debate

Republican presidential candidates former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, left, gestures as Texas Gov. Rick Perry watches during a Republican debate Monday, Sept. 12, 2011, in Tampa, Fla.

/ Mike Carlson/AP

The eight GOP candidates for the presidential nomination played to a friendly and sometimes boisterous crowd of fans Monday night. The Tea Party Express and more than 100 state and local Tea Party groups around the country sponsored the debate, which aired on CNN.

Unlike most election season debates, in which the mainstream media hosts request that the live audience refrain from excessive expressiveness, the Tea Party debate audience didn't hold back. It was more like a Tea Party town hall.

One of the biggest cheers when former Speaker Gingrich slammed President Obama, "I'm not particularly worried about Governor Perry and Governor Romney frightening the American people when President Obama scares them every single day."

Republican presidential candidate Rep. Ron Paul, R-Texas, gestures during a Republican presidential debate Monday, Sept. 12, 2011, in Tampa, Fla.

/ AP/Mike Carlson

The most controversial audience response came during an exchange between Texas Congressman Ron Paul and CNN host Wolf Blitzer, who posed the following hypothetical question:

"A healthy 30-year-old young man has a good job, makes a good living, but decides, you know what? I'm not going to spend $200 or $300 a month for health insurance because I'm healthy, I don't need it. But something terrible happens, all of a sudden he needs it. Who's going to pay if he goes into a coma, for example? Who pays for that?," Blitzer asked.

Following is the exchange:

Paul: Well, in a society that you accept welfarism and socialism, he expects the government to take care of him.

Blitzer: Well, what do you want?

Paul: But what he should do is whatever he wants to do, and assume responsibility for himself. My advice to him would have a major medical policy, but not be forced --

Blitzer: But he doesn't have that. He doesn't have it, and he needs intensive care for six months. Who pays?

Paul: That's what freedom is all about, taking your own risks. This whole idea that you have to prepare and take care of everybody --

Blitzer: But Congressman, are you saying that society should just let him die?

At that point some in the crowd voiced a resounding "yes" in response to the question. Paul went on to say, "...we've given up on this whole concept that we might take care of ourselves and assume responsibility for ourselves. Our neighbors, our friends, our churches would do it. This whole idea, that's the reason the cost is so high."

Paul was booed by many in the crowd when the topic of his statement related to 9/11 (below), contending that U.S. occupation in foreign lands leads to more terrorism, came up.

"Though it is hard for many to believe, honest studies show that the real motivation behind the September 11 attacks and the vast majority of other instances of suicide terrorism is not that our enemies are bothered by our way of life. Neither is it our religion, or our wealth," he wrote.

"Rather, it is primarily occupation. If you were to imagine for a moment how you would feel if another country forcibly occupied the United States, had military bases and armed soldiers present in our hometowns, you might begin to understand why foreign occupation upsets people so much."

The mix cheers and jeers for the eight candidates indicate that the race for the GOP nomination has a long way to go, both among the Tea Party and the less conservative members of the Republican party.

© 2011 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
  • Dan Farber On Twitter » On Google+ »

    Dan has more than 20 years of journalism experience. He has served as editor in chief of CBSNews.com, CNET News, ZDNet, PC Week, and MacWeek.

6 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
antoniof123 says:
I say good let America see what these wing nuts are about.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
sandy e.2710 says:
There was a disturbing atmosphere surrounding last week's debate, and last night's, with the audience cheering when Rick Perry spoke of execution, or as with last night, Ron Paul speaking of the uninsured 's dying as a result of not having health insurance.Regardless of where you come down on the issues of Capitol Punishment and government-based health care, the responses of cheering for execution or shouting that the uninsured should simply die if they need treatment that they can't afford, shows rigid ideology and callousness in many of the Tea Party that is unsettling, to say the least.On the substance of the question posed to Paul, Wolfe Blitzer was really asking him about what we should do when it comes to the masses of uninsured people that taxpayers endu up footing the bill for anyway, if not "Obamacare"
9 (which would actually speak to the scenario that Blitzer used because of the individual mandate )that, as they term it, then what.Paul's answer , that either churches, charities, or neighbors help pay the astronomically high health care costs, or just die, rather than have the government involved, is totally unrealistic ( His answer was particularly disturbing because he was a doctor, and should be more sympathetic to the plight of the sick, and the uninsured; knowing just how expensive medical care is ).There is no way, as many conservatives advocate, for churches or charities to absorb these costs even for a few people, let alone masses.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
eteamer says:
Hope they serve tea in he//.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
tiredofeverything says:
"Blitzer: But Congressman, are you saying that society should just let him die?

At that point some in the crowd voiced a resounding "yes" in response to the question."

Says everything you need to know about tea partiers.
The only life they care about are those that haven't even been born ... after that it's f-you
reply
zenia5 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Amen. That about sums it up.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
MichaelVW says:
It was so disturbing and sad to hear the audience booing Ron's explanation of (blowback) US foreign policy, which is the truth. You could see how pissed off Ron was getting as Santorum accused him for writing lies on his website Sunday. Ron Paul should have lit into him like a grandpa catching his grandson stealing. Romney learned his lesson 4 years ago when he and Guillani both laughed at Ron for peddling such "nonsense," and claiming other people hate the US because we're rich and go to church. No, it's because we're stupid and let our gov't elites do whatever is "best" around the world. Ron was off his game tonight, but no else is as true, dedicated, and informed of the true problems as he is. I was impressed by Bachmann's rhetoric, but she's too fresh.
reply
Scroll Left Scroll Right