Political Hotsheet
By

Stephanie Condon /

CBS News/ September 6, 2011, 5:34 PM

Mitt Romney introduces "business plan" for the economy

Presenting what he called "a business plan for the American economy," Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney on Tuesday laid out the 10 actions he'd take to revive economic growth on his first day as president.

"The world has changed," Romney said during a campaign stop in Las Vegas. "So our economic strategy has to be brought up to date."

The 10 immediate actions Romney laid out today are part of his new economic plan, which consists of 59 proposals largely familiar to GOP audiences. They include eliminating the capital gains tax for "middle-income" taxpayers and instituting other tax reforms, scaling back regulations, standing against union interests and expanding domestic energy production.

The former Massachusetts governor made a point of showing his Nevada audience that he was not using a teleprompter but just written notes on his plan in order to have a true "conversation" about the economy. To illustrate the way the world has changed, Romney used the example of the growing use of smartphones in place of payphones.

Speaking just days ahead of President Obama's planned economic address before a joint session of Congress, Romney said the president doesn't understand the new economy.

"President Obama's strategy is a payphone strategy, and we're in a smartphone world," he said. "What he's doing is stuffing quarters into the payphone and wondering why it's not working -- It's not connected, Mr. President."

CBSNews.com special report: Campaign 2012

The plan the president will lay out on Thursday will amount to "another stimulus and more quarters" which won't put America back to work, Romney said.

The GOP candidate said that his plan could grow the economy at a rate of 4 percent a year and add 11.5 million new jobs for Americans within four years.

On his first day in office, Romney said he'd submit five bills to Congress and sign five executive orders, including one bill to reduce the corporate income tax rate to 25 percent. He'd also introduce a measure to implement the free trade agreements with Colombia, Panama, and South Korea -- agreements Mr. Obama has also asked Congress to act on.

"For high-productivity nations it's good to have trade, as long as the nations we trade with play by the rules," Romney said, calling China a "currency manipulator."

One of his executive orders would officially dub China a currency manipulator and sanction the country if it did not quickly move to float its currency.

Romney's third bill would facilitate broader domestic energy production. He'd sign a corresponding executive order to streamline the issuance of drilling permits to boost energy production.

His fourth bill would consolidate job retraining programs. His final bill would immediately cut non-security discretionary spending by 5 percent.

Two executive orders would take on regulatory actions implemented by the Obama administration. The first would roll back the "Obamacare" health care law. According to a fact sheet from the Romney campaign, it would direct federal officials to "return the maximum possible authority to the states to innovate and design health care solutions that work best for them."

Another executive order would direct agencies to eliminate all Obama-era regulations that "unduly burden" the economy. His last order would reverse executive orders signed by Mr. Obama that "tilt the playing field" in favor of organized labor.

"We have to recognize our nation is in competition with other nations around the world," Romney said.

Romney's speech drew criticism from both his GOP and Democratic opponents. Ben LaBolt of the Obama re-election campaign said Romney "offered a plan that would tip the scales against hard-working Americans."

Former Utah Gov. Jon Huntsman, another GOP presidential candidate, argued today that Romney had a failed economic record as governor. Mark Miner, a spokesperson for Texas governor and 2012 presidential candidate Rick Perry, similarly said that as governor, Romney "failed to create a pro-jobs environment and failed to institute many of the reforms he now claims to support."

© 2011 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
23 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
djern says:
Mitt Romney not only would I not vote for you...you do not have the people's best interest at heart...I come on and pray tell what do I first see...Please give...and where should I take that from...you give Obama how many days...Think again my friend...he by himself did not make this mess...He HAS tried to clean it up..but this was created by nonother than your Republican coheart in crime....May God help you...because you are not here for the average person...
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
bb7132 says:
Why is it that these people all have ideas for job creation,but have never had one ????
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
wfw3536 says:
I will be interested to see Obamas big plan and compare it to Romney's plan which is actually 59 actions in a 150 page book of details. Obama has been working on his plan for over a month so I am sure his will be bigger and just as detailed. If he comes on and just blames everyone and everything and gives us some vague actions then it will just show how incompetent this president is in regards to the economy.
reply
jimbom121 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Romney's "59" points are rehashes of the Bush plan, written by teh Bush team.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
aldrich617 says:
About the only point which I can agree with Romney is that corporate tax rates should be reduced. However, I believe that
that a top rate on high individual earners should be increased
to 50%, in line with the more enlightened European nations.
The fact is, 80% of high paid US executives could be replaced
(all things being equal) successfully by educated menial
workers. If you want to bust a bloated union ,why not go after
the self-besotted union of over-rated progeny of the rich. They
are the ones that should be disenfranchised more than any.

The "drill baby, drill" energy theme is also overated. In the long
term, conserving our oil, while using up theirs, is clearly to our advantage.

Although regulations do at times impeed economic growth, sometimes
even staunch Republicans might support them if for example, a rich
vein of platinum was discovered directly under their rich suburb.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
RobAla says:
The majority of Romneys plan sounds pretty good. The main ingredient in creating jobs in the private sector is to repeal the health care law. That stupid law does more to stifle private sector jobs than any one thing.
reply
jimbom121 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Romney's plan is the same as Bush's...even written by the same people.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
6591Hou says:
Banks were bailed out and consumers did not benefit, corporations were bailed out and layoffs ensued....lowering corporate taxes may increase profits and shareholder dividends but when corporations get leaner and meaner they cut staffing, increase hours, and reduce benefits - while unions increase overhead and drive up prices (businesses don't just eat those benefit package costs after all).
Increase corporate taxes, increase taxes on imported piece parts, and get people off unemployment and working on infrastructure such as power grids and transportation corridors.
Romney may think it's witty to call it a smartphone era, but he needs an upgrade to a 4G phone.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
michaelaltepeter says:
so... cut taxes for corps, etc. ok what makes sure the money saved by corps, investors, etc gets spent making jobs in the us. why won't the corps and investors take the tax money they save overseas??
second any money that is invested in US will be in stuff that employs the fewest people possible (see the commercial with all the driverless forklifts), so although profits and the market goes up, that does not necessarily mean the job market gets better at the same rate.
reply
nearl451 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
That is valid. Tax cuts need not be spent on stimulating US economy or US jobs. This is a very Keynesian observation.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
nearl451 says:
Pretty clever quips, but the problem is the US Govt is not akin to any business and is purposely a divided govt.

That is why the Predident is NOT analogous to the CEO of a company.

Then there is all that ignorance of how the worldwide economy works today. Frankly, there are no economists that have a recipe out of the zero interest, deficit spending, zero tax interest, non-Keynesian, Non-Friedman, Non-neoliberal (a.k.a. free market solves all), house of cards that we have deregulated ourselves into.

Romney is frankly whistling in the graveyard.
reply
nearl451 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
I am glad tosee that ROmney is aboard the Presidents plan for trade agreements with SA to bolster demand and energy development, though.

See....he is just like Obama.
nearl451 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
....only different.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
frankie2fing says:
Nothing like a GOP plan to race us to the bottom. Instead of making other countries coming up to our standard of living, via tariffs, the cons want us to lower our standards to compete with people making $5.00 a day. You teabaggers are in for a huge suprise when, after they use and abuse you, they drop you like a rock. Or maybe they will drop the rock on your head. Or maybe that has already happened since you ball sucking jerks obviously cannot think...
reply
skivtyo replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
One classy Left Winger right here folks...
linkicon reporticon emailicon
alongawaitedfriend says:
Typical Republican plan. Cut taxes for the wealthy so they'll create jobs. How's that one been working out for us, with the UE rate over 9%?

Also, destroy the middle class. His comment about "competing" with other countries obviously means Americans are overpaid. So, we all take a pay cut. How is that going to help us buy things to create economic activity?

We've been largely following the Republican way for the last thirty years, ever since Reagan was elected. How has that been going for us? Huge budget deficits, huge trade deficits, the loss of millions of jobs. Do we really need some more of that? No, we do not. Hopefully the voters will send Mitt home, and soon.
reply
See all 23 Comments