Jeb Bush: GOP candidates can't just attack Obama
AP
Former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush said Tuesday evening that the Republican presidential candidates need to do more than attack President Obama if they want to win in 2012.
"It's good to be critical of the president -- I think the president means well, but his policies have failed," Bush, a Republican and the former president's younger brother, said on Fox News. "But just to stop there and say, 'I'm going to win because I'm against what's going on' is not good enough. You have to win with purpose if you really want to make these big changes."
That said, the former governor added that the current field of candidates should be up to the task.
"I think it's a little early to be dissatisfied with the candidates," Bush said. "I think you'll find the candidates will start staking out positions that are responsible and forward leaning... As that happens, I think people will start migrating towards those candidates."
Bush said flatly, "I'm not running," but he added that he may support a candidate before the primaries are up.
When asked about former Utah governor and presidential candidate Jon Huntsman's remarks this week that some of the GOP candidates are unelectable, Bush first said, "I like Jon Huntsman a lot... We need to be a broad party with divergent views."
He added that there's nothing wrong with being conservative, but "if you're a conservative, you have to defend a position, you can't just be against the president."
Bush defended Texas Gov. Rick Perry's right to question whether global warming is man-made and shot down suggestions that there's a rift between Perry and the Bush family.
Bush added that if Republicans shifted their "tone" on the issue of immigration, the party could pick up significant Hispanic support.
He also called for tax code reform. "If we could simplify the code and eliminate all these deductions and credits... it would create a burst of economic activity and create for certainty in the future as well," he said.
CBSNews.com special report: Campaign 2012
Popular in Politics
- For GOP, scandals could be an electoral plus - or minus 262 Comments
- Officials on Benghazi: "We made mistakes, but without malice" 311 Comments
- IRS targeting overlooked biggest soft money groups
- Republicans use IRS scandal to tar Obamacare
- Where is the Benghazi cover-up Republicans promised? 392 Comments
- Ousted IRS chief: "I did not mislead" the American people 259 Comments
- Why Obama should worry that current scandals might impact 2016 229 Comments
- FBI seeks anonymous source behind Menendez allegations














Must be the corporate money speaking.
Why? Because more and more Americans are seeing through the attacks, the lies and the rhetoric and realizing that the Republicans are doing nearly nothing positive for America even though they are promising everything.
Why? Because Americans are tired of the ceaseless and mostly dishonest attacks and as they continue more and more are being pushed into voting FOR Obama instead of against him.
Why? Because Americans are seeing that these attacks are merely masks to hide the fact that Republicans don't have a candidate or any plan that can fix the problems America has today.
Why? Because Americans are beginning to see that the way the Republicans are acting today is part of why we are in the messes we are in.
They don't know what to do with rational advice anyway.
Their only solution is to pray for supernatural causation; they certainly aren't capable of working to acheive results.
I think the field will contract and I also think some sparks will fly, dang, I hope so. This only blame Obama, never give a solution or a contrast with the other candidates is boring.
We need to fight the intolerant and the extreme, whether right or left.
Wasn't that Bush? That worked out well didn't it. An intelligent, reasonable person knows you learn and change as situations chance. The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over expecting a different outcome. Come to think of it, that defines a conservative/teabagger to a "t".
Greed is good!!!
---
Initiative and drive are admirable qualities.
Greed, most certainly, is not.
Sorry.
----
Well, that leaves Sarah out right there....
Never offers anything but criticism.