Barack Obama attends a fundraiser on the eve of his 50th birthday, Wednesday, Aug. 3, 2011, in Chicago.
/ AP Photo/M. Spencer GreenPresident Obama got what he wanted for his birthday, but by his own admission, it wasn't as spectacular as one would hope for.
Back in June, the president told NPR that what he really wanted for his 50th birthday was a debt ceiling deal. He got that gift, of course, just two days ahead of his birthday today. But at a fundraiser that doubled as a birthday celebration last night, the president acknowledged that few are happy with the way the deal was reached.
"Obviously, we've just gone through an extraordinary week in Washington, an extraordinary two weeks in Washington," he told a group of 100 wealthy supporters the Aragon Ballroom in Chicago. "It's not the kind of extraordinary the American people are looking for."
Mr. Obama defended the debt package as "responsible" in paying down the national debt and added that it's "not going to dismantle our social safety net." He also took a jab at Republicans, remarking, "I give the other side credit. They are single-minded in their focus in wanting to cut programs and shrink government."
The president's fundraiser was his first in a month, after he put his campaigning on hold to deal with the debate over raising the debt limit. The 100 supporters who attended the dinner donated as much as $35,800 for tickets, while about 2,400 other donors -- some donning cone-shaped birthday hats with the Obama campaign logo on them -- paid a minimum of $50 to attend a larger event. The party-goers were entertained by the likes of musicians Jennifer Hudson and Herbie Hancock and the band OK Go.
While the debate over the debt limit may have discouraged his supporters, particularly progressives, the president said during his fundraising events that the struggle proved just how important the next election is.
"We've already seen over the last week just how different the two visions are in terms of which direction we should take the country," Mr. Obama said in a video teleconference with supporters. "This is really important moment in our history."
The 2012 election, he said, "in some ways may be more important than the last one."
In the future, Mr. Obama said, he wants to take on immigration, energy policy, tax reform, and continue to work on building up the economy and reducing the deficit and debt in a responsible way.
While wrapping up the debt deal must have been a relief to the president, he told his supporters Wednesday that he couldn't have had a better birthday present than spending the night in Chicago.
"It's true that I turn 50 tomorrow," he said, adding that by the time he wakes up tomorrow he expects an email from AARP "asking me to call President Obama and tell him to protect Medicare."
Today, the president has a quiet public schedule, but privately he'll have two birthday celebrations. First, his senior staff will hold a toast for the president in the White House Blue Room today. In the evening, Mr. Obama and First Lady Michelle are hosting White House Rose Garden party for some of their friends, which the Obamas are paying for themselves, reports the Chicago Sun Times' Lynn Sweet.
Even if the debt deal has left the president feeling weary at age 50, he can take comfort in knowing he's still the 5th youngest president, according to CBS News White House Correspondent Mark Knoller. He took office at 47 years old. The youngest ever president was Teddy Roosevelt, who took office at 42.
Obama, staff toast debt deal with burgers
Obama to Chicago for 50th birthday fundraiser
Photos: Obama on the campaign trail
What a waste of time and resources to celebrate the President multiple times kind of vain as well.
I believe it is time we get a President who will not cower to the rich. I mean I am sorry call it jealousy or whatever you want but the upper crust people over 250 million and especially those in the billionaire bracket Yes that means Oprah too should be paying more tax percentage than Joe Blow who makes under $35000 a year.
Of course that will never happen do you know how much cash our government could make if they just set an overall rule that everyone pay say 10% taxes a year. The rich can complain all they want but I am sick of seeing the massive greed our country has sustained by not raising taxes on the rich because supposedly they'd take their jobs and go elsewhere. Countries are getting smarter they see what our businesses are doing to them and although still many work well below even tolerable existance income it's time they stood up and their goverment stood up for it's people and quit being the cheap workers that they are they deserve fair wages as well as us and each of these countries need their own politicians to take their own hands out of the cookie jar and respond with "Okay you want our workers well then they at least make the same minimum wage your country pays" Once someone stands up against this the Rich will always control our lives, government and everything else.
The founding fathers wanted a Democracy, not a Theocracy.
After what the Tea Party pulled - y'all can kiss yours and your obstructionist tactics good-bye.
Second off, the Republicans stated from the start that they opposed any tax increases in any way, shape or form.
Third off, what's the point in trying to pass a bill through Congress if you know that you don't have the votes?
3a) Boehner found out the hard way when his budget passed through the house, but was killed in the senate within a few hours.
3b) The Senate Republicans attempted to filibuster the Democrats Budget before it was even brought to a vote.
3c) The House Republicans killed the Senate Democrats budget before it even CAME to the House.
There was THIS much partisanship and brinksmanship in Congress, period. And we're blaming Obama for it?
Did you support Paul Ryan's plan? Because I'd like to know what you plan on supporting yourself with when you retire. I'd also like you to go to every member of the AARP to tell them that "sorry, we can't support you any more. But you can make yourselves useful by shortening your life span..."
Fair enough.
However ... with the demotion in credit rating, it's fair to say that the same group of people are pinning the blame solely on Obama. Nevermind, that it's Congress that legislates the laws. Nevermind that FDR was the one who instituted social security. Nevermind that the government had to bail out the auto industry, as well as the mortgage companies, and Wall Street... Nevermind that spending under Obama has generally been towards infrastructure and job creation rather than the Pork Barrel spending we're so familiar with when it comes to Southern and Midwestern House Reps...
So - explain to me why the double standard?
Why refuse to give Obama credit for OBL ... and then give him sole credit for the S&P's verdict on the credit rating?