Head of U.S. Postal Service says delivery could be scaled back to 3 days a week
U.S. Postal Service mail carrier, Alberto Jo, drives the mail truck as he delivers mail to homes on August 5, 2010 in Miami, Florida.
/ Photo by Joe Raedle/Getty ImagesThe Postal Service's "cashflow crisis is at a critical level," Donahoe told USA Today in an interview published Wednesday. Donahoe said eliminating Saturday mail would save around $3.1 billion a year for the cash-strapped agency, projected to lose $8.3 billion this year.
"At some point, we'll have to move to three" days a week of mail delivery, possibly in 15 years, he told the newspaper.
The steady loss of revenue has prompted the Postal Service to evaluate possible cost-saving measures. Donahoe said the USPS is on track to miss a Sept. 30 payment of $5.5 billion to the U.S. Treasury that would allow the Uncle Sam to "pre-fund retired health benefits" of postal workers.
Congress mandated the six-day delivery schedule in 1983, but Donahoe said there may be more support for cutting Saturday service now as the U.S. faces more pressure to improve its fiscal condition.
The idea has "a much better chance today than a year ago. I don't know if I'd say 'likely' yet," Donahoe said.
Democratic Senator Tom Carper of Delaware has introduced legislation that would allow for the Saturday elimination, but the idea is widely opposed by rural lawmakers.
Democratic Sen. Jon Tester of Montana worries that residents of states like his would suffer as a result of the shortened delivery schedule, the newspaper reported.
Donahoe noted a USA TODAY/Gallup poll last year found more than half of those polled did not object to losing Saturday delivery.
Other cost-saving measures include a likely one cent increase for First-Class mail in January, and "reviewing 3600 post offices for some change in access." Those changes could include consolidation, closing, or contracting services out to other services. Donahoe assures that the changes will be "wide open" with "a lot of public input."
"There will always be a market for direct mail," he said, and the USPS "will still be an important part of American economy and society."
Popular in Politics
- Obama prom pictures surface
- Drones, Gitmo part of broad Obama counterterrorism speech
- Lawmakers push to punish sexual offenders in the military
- Boehner calls out Obama administration's "arrogance of power" 75 Comments
- IRS' Lerner: "I have not done anything wrong" 853 Comments
- Issa: IRS' Lerner waived her Fifth Amendment rights
- House passes GOP bill to speed Keystone XL pipeline approval
- Could the GOP pull an upset in Mass. senate race?














1) The USPS uses no tax dollars whatsoever. All revenue comes from the
sale of postage and a small amount from other products or services.
2) The USPS is currently required by congress to prefund retiree health
benefits up to 75 years in the future. This was designed to insure
the long-term viability of the USPS (hah). This money, paid to the
US Treasury, amounts to about 5 billion dollars yearly.
3) If not for the requirement to prefund health benefits for retirees
who haven't been born yet, the USPS would be operating in the black.
4) Since the USPS is a not-for-profit entity, designed to "break even,"
it cannot survive an additional 5 billion annual expense, UNLESS it
is allowed to utilize several billions that the civil service and
FERS retirement accounts are already over-funded by.
5) Since this extra money is in the US Treasury, congress doesn't want
the USPS to touch it, because it is being balanced against the debt.
If I buy something online..how is it going to get to me then?
Probably half the people reading this won't be around in 15 years.
COULD GAIN ACCESS TO THEIR OWN MONEY!
How many Fortune 500 companies can boast that their pension plan
is overfunded by 60 - 70 BILLION Dollars?
How many Fortune 500 companies have to put up with politicians
blocking the use of their own money to stay in business?
NONE ON BOTH COUNTS.
Politicians and lobbyists are fronting for a group of robber barons who are drooling at the prospect of dividing up the Post Office among
themselves. The Public Interest to them is merely an obstacle to be
circumvented in their quest to bring more money to their pockets.
There is no fairness in their anti - PO plan to use all available political and media clout to prevent the USPS from fixing itself. These greedy, nasty folks do not miss a trick and work from a Murdoch-style playbook.