July 18, 2011 2:36 PM

Tom Coburn unveils $9 trillion deficit plan

By
Lucy Madison
Topics
Economy

Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla.

Updated: 3:06 p.m. ET

Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., released on Monday a plan to reduce the national deficit by $9 trillion over the next ten years - although the Republican senator said on Sunday he intends the plan to be more of a guideline for Congress rather than a realistic option in and of itself.

The plan, called "Back in Black," proposes spending cuts that span the entire U.S. government - from Congress to independent agencies - and aims to reform entitlements and overhaul the U.S. tax code.

"This plan offers the American people 9 trillion reasons to stop making excuses and start solving the problems in Washington," Coburn said in a press conference Monday.

Still, as Coburn pointed out on CBS' "Face the Nation" on Sunday, he does not expect the plan to successfully pass through the Congress.

"I wouldn't expect [the proposal] to pass, but I would expect people to look at it," Coburn told Bob Schieffer. ""We have spent thousands of hours going through every program in the federal government. We have $9 trillion worth of savings that are achievable over the next ten years. Pick half of them. Half of them solve our problems."

Among the proposed cuts in Coburn's plan include $974.1 billion in cuts from the general government, as well as billions from Congress and the Executive Office of the President. Those reductions would be achieved partially by cutting 300,000 jobs from the federal workforce, and imposing a three-year pay and bonus freeze for federal workers and Congress members.

The proposal also targets more than a trillion dollars from the Department of Defense budget, as well as hundreds of billions from the departments of Energy, Homeland Security, Justice, and Education. NASA, the Environmental Protection Agency, the Small Business Administration and numerous other government agencies are also hit with billions in reductions.

"The federal government has become so large, it is impossible to grasp its true size and scope or to pay for its costs," Coburn writes in the proposal's executive summary. "Nearly every corner of the federal government is rife with duplication, mismanagement, and special interest carve outs. Each is protected by an entrenched bureaucracy, a well-financed lobbying group, an active and organized constituency, and an entrenched politician, which time and again align to best any efforts to reform, cut, or eliminate government waste."

Coburn's plan - the most expansive such proposal put forth so far - also calls for major reforms to Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security that would amount to more than $2.5 trillion in cuts over the next ten years.

Some of the reforms to Medicare and Medicaid include raising the eligibility age for Medicare recipients, tracking high prescribers and prescription drug users to detect abuse, enrolling low-income seniors in Medicaid managed care programs, and reducing subsidies to teaching hospitals for graduate medical education.

For Social Security, Coburn proposes restraining benefits for high earners, raising the retirement age, and adjusting cost-of-living calculations to more accurately reflect inflation.

"Real choices must be made to reduce spending, increase revenues, or both," Coburn writes. If Washington does not begin making these difficult choices today, those decision will be made for us tomorrow and the results could be catastrophic," Coburn writes. "The only guaranteed entitlements for future generations will be debt and lower standards of living."

The senator, however, does not limit his proposed savings to spending cuts alone: the plan also carves out more than $990 billion that could be saved by overhauling the tax code and eliminating "the most egregious tax giveaways."

"Politicians love to play the tax code because it benefits the politicians," Coburn said on Monday.

Among the proposed tax reforms include the elimination of breaks that are duplicative of government funding for local economic initiatives, the elimination of special interest corporate tax breaks, and cutting what Coburn describes as "misguided subsidies" for some clean energy initiatives.

He added, in the report: "The tax code is long overdue for comprehensive restructuring. Yet, instead of considering broad reform to simplify the code and lower rates, Washington continues to make the problem worse--doling out new tax breaks and subsidies in the form of tax credits to well-connected companies and special interests with powerful lobbyists who seem to have more influence than most members of Congress. The result is a complex tax structure that benefits only a few, hinders economic growth and drives up costs and taxes for many working families and businesses across the country."

Coburn acknowledged to reporters that not everyone would support his sweeping proposal.

"I have no doubt both parties will criticize portions of this plan and I welcome that debate," he said. "I don't care what the political problems [with the plan] are; the fact is that the country's at risk and it's not time to consider the political problems - it's time to consider the country."

Here are some highlights from the plan: 

Tax Reform:

  • Ends special interest tax breaks  - including for NASCAR and Hollywood; eliminates IRS exemptions for bailout recipients

  • Reforms the Home Mortgage deduction: As proposed by the President's National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform, eliminating the deduction for second homes and equity lines of credit, combined with lowering the cap for the primary deduction to homes worth $500,000, will better target the mortgage deduction to those with the most need, while resulting in significant savings.

Defense:

  • Cuts $1 trillion from defense budget

  • Closes Department of Defense (DOD) elementary schools and end subsidies for DOD grocery stores

  • Joint Strike Fighter- DOD should either enter into multiyear procurement agreement to save money or completely replace with super hornet.

Federal Workforce:

  • Three-year freeze on federal worker's pay; reduce federal workforce by 15%. Reduce number of federal contractors.

Entitlements:

  • Would raise Medicare's eligibility age to 67. Would raise by two months every year beginning with people who were born in 1949 (who will turn 65 in 2014).
  • Transfers Medicaid to states

Jill Jackson contributed to this report.


Add a Comment See all 19 Comments
by buildcastles July 19, 2011 9:38 AM EDT
"Back in Black" plan by Coburn from OK is the best I've seen. Wish we could pair the 9 Trillion plan with the debt commission plan of 5.8 Trillion. We would be on track for a balanced budget.

http://www.houseforsaleweb.com
Reply to this comment
by sjc_1 July 19, 2011 11:54 AM EDT
It is mostly cutting departments so much that they can not get anything done. I suppose if you are for corporations, you do not want to have anyone watching you loot and pollute.
by davidpeter74464 July 20, 2011 7:04 AM EDT
We can easily cut $8 trillion over the next 10 years from "defense" alone but the US government will not give up its empire, an empire that has cost us dearly in trillions wasted and millions of lives lost, both the lives of our beloved soldiers, our citizens on 9/11 and millions of lives lost in the 18th, 19th, 20th and 21st centuries due to the US government's short sighted policies that cater to the powerful in the corporate welfare system of the warfare institutions and corporations that are sucking the life out of our economy, draining the treasury, looting trillions from hard working Americans while cancer research funding is being cut even when millions of Americans are dying every few years from cancer alone
by pasha128 July 19, 2011 7:01 AM EDT
by RobAla July 18, 2011 9:18 PM EDT
....
First of all, an amendment to the US Constitution goes to the states for ratification - not to a President for approval. If an amendment passed the House and Senate (which I doubt it would pass the Senate), the President has no say in the matter.

---

Personally I doubt the current balanced budget amendment could pass the House with the 2/3 supermajority required. As far as the Senate odds are better that it could be rejected by a 2/3 majority. As far as legislation mandating passage of a balanced budget amendment passed by a simple majority in this house -- it's meaningless because it takes a 2/3 majority to pass any amendment. To be exact if as the Republicans contend the balanced budget amendment is critical to the success of the legislation the law containing that provision would have to be ruled unconstitutional in it's entirety (remember Republicans claim the Balanced Budget Amendment portion is not severable) until both houses of congress (by a 2/3 majority) and 3/4 of the state legislatures approved the constitutional amendment.
Reply to this comment
by GOPFailure July 18, 2011 8:38 PM EDT
To think that a GOP Bone-Head like Coburn-who obstructed the Credit Card Reform for the whims of the NRA-that needed so desperately to repeal the Reagan 1987 Natl. Park Law of No loaded guns-because the NRA felt it was more important than fixing the GOP Credit Card SCAM mess.

Trust the GOP, REALLY? Tax the Wealthy 7 Big Corporate For Profit LEACHES-No Jobs after over a DECADE and the GOP cry about taxing the jobs creators, REALLY? Where are the JOBS, GOP?
Reply to this comment
by LMADster July 18, 2011 7:03 PM EDT
The Coburn plan? The Conrad plan? Ryan Roadmap? Obama outline? Bowles-Simpson? These plans reduce the deficit only $4 to $5 trillion, at best (and even that is BS). But they still add $6 trillion! It doesn't matter which plan wins, America still loses. Both parties are simply competing to see who can BEST MANAGE America's decline.

None of these plans do anything to increase economic growth, fix healthcare or rationalize taxes or permanently fix illegal immigration. The LMAD DOES!

LMAD has it all! Healthcare-for-All? It's in there. Balanced budget? It's in there. Carbon tax? It's in there. Rational taxation? Amnesty? Border Security? Limited government? Social Security and Medicare solvency? It's all in there; it's all paid for and it's all optimized.

The LMAD plan uses a $600 billion/ year carbon tax NOT to fight global warming BUT to BUY off Liberals. And that's just the start? LMAD also adds fully-funded Healthcare for every American, a public option health insurance entity, and the implementation of tax schemes frequently advocated by Liberals such as a "sugar" tax and a value-added tax. The LMAD plan even grants overnight amnesty of 10 million illegal aliens.

THEN LMAD buys off Conservatives with much more than a balanced budget and limited government ; it permanently ends future illegal immigration with zero-tolerance, adds tort reform and completely replaces all taxes on production, labor, saving and investment with the new carbon tax, the value-added tax and the sugar tax. The LMAD plan even removes the burden of healthcare expenses from corporate balance sheets by ending our reliance on employer-provided health insurance.

It's time for progressives concerned about rising temperatures and conservatives concerned about rising federal debt to realize the obvious: they need to BUY each other off in order to effectively address their pet ideological concerns-there is no other way. This means trading, among other things, a carbon tax for a balanced budget amendment and a more limited government. This plan is outlined at http://letsmakeadeal-thebook.com

Plan Blog: letsmakeadeal-thebook.com/

Facebook: facebook.com/pages/Lets-Make-A-Deal-The-Book/143298165732386

Twitter: twitter.com/#!/lmadster

Or just Google "LMADster" for more info.

The alternative? Greece.
Reply to this comment
by ryanhn July 18, 2011 6:30 PM EDT
I'll take any plan at this point. This one's at least semi-balanced. Just pass something to get us out from under the shadow of this Aug. 2nd deadline.
Reply to this comment
by JV1970 July 19, 2011 11:21 AM EDT
I agree! If they don't and the elderly and veterans and the military don't get their checks in August, there is going to be such an uproar in Washington and they are going to get so many hate messages that they are going to think the world fell in on them!
by Lindag10 July 19, 2011 8:30 PM EDT
I agree that if these fools in Congress don't get their act together, it's going to take the whole country down. Seems like that's what the TEA Party and Norquist want. This guy makes a lot of sense which means no one in Congress will buy into it.
by Lindag10 July 18, 2011 4:55 PM EDT
It'll never fly with the Tea Party. Too bad as he has some good ideas.
Reply to this comment
by JV1970 July 19, 2011 11:10 AM EDT
This is unusual for you! You don't usually agree with anything a Republican has to say!
by Lindag10 July 19, 2011 8:27 PM EDT
JV I'm not a hardnosed liberal like you think. I'm an independant and want what is best for the country period.
by BorrowMyBrain July 18, 2011 4:27 PM EDT
Now there's a leader! And there are the answers to our debt crisis. Are you listening Mr. Obama? Didn't think so . . . .

Our congress and white house are broken and Tom Coburn has the answers. Sadly, nobody is listening. The Senator from Oklahoma is showing you all the way out, but nobody is listening. Keep spending
Obama while your legacy is being written.
Reply to this comment
by Anotheryahoo July 19, 2011 11:30 AM EDT
I like what Coburn has proposed and seems to be across the board. This is what we should be doing and talking about. The Joint strike fighter is 1 good example of a program way over budget, behind again whats new? The taxpayer gets endlessly soaked by the military industrial complex and by social welfare. I hope more people on both sides will look at all of this.
by sjc_1 July 18, 2011 3:45 PM EDT
Coburn said that no one would vote for it, but he did it anyway.
Reply to this comment
by ajvw July 18, 2011 4:06 PM EDT
he made an effort. more than your boy barry has done
by sjc_1 July 18, 2011 4:38 PM EDT
President Obama proposed a $4 trillion deficit reduction plan in April of this year.
See all 19 Comments
.

Follow Political Hotsheet

Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook