Michele Bachmann's dodging could define campaign (video)
As Minnesota Rep. Michele Bachmann's campaign for the presidency puts her under the microscope, she's getting tough questions from reporters. And at times, she isn't answering them.
Bachmann certainly has clearly answered some of the questions put to her during her recent media tour, but her silence on others has been loud. And while she's not the first politician not to answer questions, her dodging and misstatements are threatening to define her initial campaign push.
On this Sunday's "Face the Nation" and Tuesday's "Early Show" on CBS, Bachmann answered some the questions posed to her. But at other times she simply spoke past them. (Watch in the video above.)
On "Face the Nation," for example, host Bob Schieffer pressed Bachmann to take a stand against fellow Republican candidate Mitt Romney over his Massachusetts health care law that served as a model for President Obama's plan.
Rep. Michele Bachmann, R-Minn., on 'Face the Nation,' Sunday, June 26, 2011.
/ CBS/Chris Usher"I firmly am against the individual mandate. I think it is unconstitutional whether it's put into place at the state level by a state legislature or whether it's put into place at the federal level. I think it's unconstitutional..." said Bachmann.
"So when you get on the stage with Mitt Romney, are you going to say anything about his health care plan, or..." Schieffer pressed.
"Well, I suppose it depends on who's asking the questions," she replied. "Usually we aren't able to just go on our own. But I'm sure I undoubtedly will be bringing up this issue of health care, because it's been the signature issue for President Obama. People are not happy with it. The President needed to focus on the economy. And what this will be is one of the largest spending projects that the federal government has ever taken on. And we simply can't afford it right now. So I -- undoubtedly, this is something we'll talk about."
Bachmann did not, you'll note, directly address the question in that response.
It was one of many such examples. Later in the broadcast, Schieffer asked the three-term Congresswoman if support for same-sex marriage would be a litmus test for her in nominating judges.
"I want people who are for the Constitution. That's my litmus test. I want judges who are committed to the fidelity of the Constitution. And not acting outside the bounds of Article Three," Bachmann responded.
"So a person who may have been on the record as saying he favored same sex marriage, you wouldn't disqualify that person for nominating them to the Supreme Court?" he asked, seeking a direct answer.
Bachmann's reply: "My primary test will be the Constitution. They need to be a strong constitutionalist and recognize that just as the justices should not act outside of the bounds, neither should the Congress, neither should the president."
"I have to say, I don't think you answered the question. But I'll go on," said Schieffer.
As the interview was wrapping up, Schieffer asked Bachmann about her record for misstatements, noting that the nonpartisan website Politifact has rated more than 20 of her statements as less than true.
"How do you explain that?" he asked. She answered by talking about President Obama's offshore drilling record.
Schieffer pushed back: "quickly, though -- the original question I asked you is, all of these statements that you have made that have later proven to be sort of true, or totally false in some cases -- what's your answer when people say that to you? Do you feel you have misled people?"
"No, I haven't misled people at all," replied Bachmann. "I think the question would be asked of President Obama, "When you told the American people that if we borrow a trillion dollars from other countries and spend it on a stimulus, that we won't have unemployment go above eight percent," and today, as we're sitting here, it's 9.1 percent and the economy is tanking, that is what's serious," she said - and continued on that point until Schieffer stopped her.
"Again, I have to say, Congresswoman, I asked you a question, and you, to my knowledge, I don't believe you answered it," he said.
Popular in Politics
- Officials on Benghazi: "We made mistakes, but without malice" 438 Comments
- IRS' Lerner: "I have not done anything wrong" 304 Comments
- Anthony Weiner comeback try begins: Running for NYC mayor 112 Comments
- Major immigration overhaul passes first big test 69 Comments
- Christie: Keep politics out of Oklahoma disaster relief
- Will tornado relief funding escape politics?
- Top IRS official to invoke 5th Amendment at congressional testimony 215 Comments
- Va. GOP candidate won't apologize for comments on abortion, gays
Don't you just love it when these republicans just pull numbers out of their back side with no regard for the facts?
and her husband federal Medicare payola will hound her all the way
up to the 2012 Republican Party Presidential Nomination Convention
and beyond. So,therefore the only choice the two Bachmanns have is to repay every penney of them,as the Kenyan Messiah Barack Hussein
and Michelle Obama also need to do so,as a way to reinburse all of
us taxpayers for all the tax dollars both Obama's have wasted on fake photo ops,misuse of Air Force One,endless rounds of golf,
lavish White House Parties,non-stop luxury vacations etc here.
Scheiffer has dressed down democrats every time they deserve it.
If repugnicants don't like their own news it is the media's fault
If they don't like a judgment its activist judges.
If they don't like legislation its unconstitutional even though most of them have no idea what the constitution really says
a political party of ignorant spoiled brats
Derail campaign?? I think Newt Gingrich has possibly derailed his campaign a few times already since people are quitting on him left and right. But TWISTING what candidates say is not HER fault, it's the fault of journalists who believe it's their DUTY to slam anybody who dares to run for office. And she's trying to be EVASIVE?? When journalists hound her and hound her to try to force her to say something, like they're just aching for her to say something negative about gays. She has stated her opinion, she's made it clear where she stands and she did it with CLASS. What do you REALLY want? Do you want her to strip to her underwear and scream that she's actually a lesbian in the closet and her husband is transgender? THEN will you be happy that you've finally gotten down to the TRUTH about Michele Bachmann???
It's not politicians who are DISGUSTING: it's the NEWS MEDIA. And they're starting the ABUSE ALL OVER AGAIN. Believe me, I'm outta here once the campaign really starts or maybe even before then. I haven't recovered from the LAST gosh-awful go-round. The only relief we got during that campaign was Obama-girl.