U.S. funding stealth Internets to circumvent repressive regimes
With a ban on foreign journalists in Syria, the world's window on the violence in the country is through cell phone pictures and refugee accounts.
/ CBS NewsThe revolution will be broadcast, despite efforts by repressive regimes to censor or shut down Internet and cell phone networks.
The New York Times reports that U.S. government funding is helping to develop and deploy "shadow" Internet and mobile phone systems to undermine repressive regimes that seek to prevent dissidents from getting their stories out to the world.
According to the Times, by the end of the year the State Department will have spent $70 million on efforts to provide alternate pathways for dissidents to access the Internet and telecommunications services.
One group received $2 million to develop an "Internet in a suitcase" that could be easily carried and set up in a foreign country.
The use of technology as a kind of soft weapon and staple of foreign policy efforts against repressive regimes has become a focus for Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. The U.S. government has financed wireless networks in Afghanistan, Libya and other countries to assist dissidents in their efforts to bring about regime change.
Read the full story at The New York Times.
Popular in Politics
- FBI director acknowledges domestic drone use 153 Comments
- Obama and Berlin: Faded echoes meet new realities 77 Comments
- Next up for Obama: Major effort on climate change
- Immigration reform would cut deficit, analysis shows 82 Comments
- House Republicans pass 20-week limit on abortions 598 Comments
- Michelle Obama and daughters tour Berlin Play Video
- IRS readying to pay $70M in employee bonuses, senator says
- IRS scandal: Is partisanship overshadowing facts?
------------------------------------------------------
can it be used here in the u.s.?
You have just proven that the fact you do not have "ba**s"
isn't stopping you from doing what needs to be done.
All other government officials take note.
Hillary for President.!
She seems to be the only person in government that has the guts to do what needs to be done.
il ya des r?gimes dictatoriaux et il ya ceux qui les soutiennent commez la Russie et la Chine,
logique ces deux pays ne sont pas un exemple de d?mocratie
........................
there are dictatorships and there are those who support such as Russia and China
logic, these two countries are not an example of democracy
"au revoir"
Right now, she seems to be the only person in government who is totally focused on her responsibilities and is willing to actually do her job.
As for Obama and Congress..see Schieffers comments elsewhere on this site.